Talk:Imola Circuit

Untitled

Please note that the phrase "... masses of tifosi (Ferrari supporters) ..." looks misleading: The italian word "tifosi" means nothing more than "sport team supporters", and is not by itself related to Ferrari supportes, of wihich it seems to be an alias, due to the context. 12:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I corrected the coordinates of the circuit. The coordinates given are for the start/finish line, taken from Google Earth. I also added an external link to the files I made with the location of the circuits that hosted the F1 World Championship since 1950. These files include a link to wikipedia article, link to layout at FIA official site or RacingCircuits.com and a virtual lap around most circuits in 2006 F1 calendar.--Ciroa 16:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)--

Assessment for F1 WikiProject

I assessed the importance of this as High due to the Death of Ayrton Senna. Feel free to ratchet down if appropriate, as tracks no longer on the calendar are normally rated as Mid. Guroadrunner (talk) 09:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

External links

I added new link to BBC.--Cheetaih (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I added new link to race-game.org--Cheetaih (talk) 02:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Out-of-date map

There do not appear to be any maps in the commons category that show the recent modifications. This page on the WTCC website shows a map of the circuit in its current configuration. The final chicane has certainly gone, while there may be other changes. - mspete93 [talk] 17:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Curves

There is a section of text - «the run from Rivazza all the way to Tosa, through the pits and the eventually notorious Tamburello was totally flat out, as was the run from Acque Minerale all the way to Rivazza» (my bold) - refering to 4 obscure entities: Rivazza, Tosa, Tamburello, Acqua Minerale?! I know they are curve names (I actually came here looking to find out which is which), but the text has no explanations of what those are. Nor where they are. So for non-fans the text is meaningless, and for non-hardcore fans (like me), it still says very little - Nabla (talk) 01:10, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Small misspelling on the map

After Sentoan put the names of the curves on the map, there's one small misspelling of one of the names: "Acque Mirenali" should actually read "Acque Minerali" - Malvim (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Autodromo Enzo e Dino Ferrari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319035342/http://formula-one.speedtv.com/article/f1-imola-eyes-return-with-top-fia-rating to http://formula-one.speedtv.com/article/f1-imola-eyes-return-with-top-fia-rating
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010053733/http://www.f1db.com/f1/page/Autodromo_Enzo_e_Dino_Ferrari to http://www.f1db.com/f1/page/Autodromo_Enzo_e_Dino_Ferrari

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 1 December 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 15:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

---

Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari → Imola Circuit – The article currently uses WP:OFFICIAL as its title, which is both unwieldy and a fairly clear violation of WP:COMMONNAME and WP:ENGLISH. By moving it to Imola Circuit, which is currently a redirect anyway, that would fix these issues while providing natural disambiguation from the town of Imola. The official name can remain in the opening sentence of the lead, the infobox, sections of prose where the official name of the track is directly relevant (ie. history), and as a redirect. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 09:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC) HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 09:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
• Support move - very rare to see the full Italian name, eg in Speedcafe they seem to always just call it "Imola" with no mention of the official name [1], [2]. Also per WP:ENGLISH as explained by the nom. As an aside, definitely the full official name must remain as a redirect and bolded in the lead per WP:OFFICIAL. A7V2 (talk) 21:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

• Support. I've never understood why some circuits aren't at their universally common names. I don't think I've once seen anyone refer to this track as anything other than Imola. (I'd also support a move to Interlagos, on the same basis) QueenCake (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.