Talk:Hurricane Kiko (1989)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Jason Rees in topic Issue with navbox?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Kiko (1989) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Hurricane Kiko (1989) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hurricane Kiko (1989) is part of the 1989 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 21, 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Some sources that might come in useful
edit- Newspaper sources:
- Other stuff:
Reference 2
editI think I'm missing the point of this reference. What fact from this reference was used to support the previous sentence? Thegreatdr (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think I need to word that better...Kiko was the only EPac storm between 1988 and 1990 that didn't develop out of a tropical wave. Cyclonebiskit 21:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, so you're using that reference to say that all systems in 1990 developed from tropical waves then. Ok. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Issue with navbox?
editIs it just me, or does the navbox at the bottom at the article force an extension of the page width? -Another Believer (Talk) 22:59, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- It does on my screen as well. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:02, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed. The problem lay in the fact that too many systems (13) were being forced on to one line.Jason Rees (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2014 (UTC)