Proposed merge of Home Colony into Home, Washington

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Same subject, but there isn't enough content in the fork to justify a standalone article SounderBruce 01:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • The census-dedicated place is independently notable and the colony has entire books written about it. That's plenty for standalone articles. czar 01:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • oppose —¿philoserf? (talk) 09:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support There is no purpose served having a small article that is basically a split of the proposed Target article that adds no additional insight or content. The target (Home, Washington) has a more in-depth view of the whole Colony experiment and area history. It actually needs more information about notable non-colony events, if such are available. Nothing is gained by fracturing this interesting subject into two rather duplicative articles. Even though the place-name may be more modernized, it is still the same place, with the same history. These two should be merged. GenQuest "scribble" 13:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
    There are books written about the colony. There is no such coverage about the census-designated place. We keep articles for "populated, legally recognized places" per WP:GEOLAND even if they are small, but that does not change the fact that there is more than enough content to warrant a separate article on the colony. czar 15:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.