Talk:HPE Integrity Servers

Inclusion of Link for driving HP Integrity business

HP handed out a HP Integrity award in July 2006 to a company called RichardsoNEyres for their efforts in driving Integrity business. Does anyone object to the placing of an external link at the end of this page highlighting the award? I received conformation of this through an online newsletter. The link to the company is below:

http://www.richardsoneyres.com/case_studies/hp.html

What he means is, is anyone willing to place this ext link in the article, since I already objected to him doing so (based solely on his contribs, nothing about this article or link, so if anyone thinks it's good, OK by me). Dicklyon 02:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Clarification needed re fortifications with HP-UX

I've tagged the sentence: "while fortifying Windows® and Linux environments with innovations from HP-UX within the next two years"

As HP-UX is an OS and so are Windows and Linux, a given server won't be running both at once (unless virtualized) and so improvements from HP-UX couldn't affect the other two in the sense this seems to imply. Perhaps this was meant to indicate that HP-UX is being positioned to be deployed in datacenters alongside Windows and Linux servers. I find the wording very ambiguous, but I'm not an expert on this line of products so I don't know what was intended. BrandyLova (talk) 13:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

My guess is that it was a euphemism that they were realizing the reality of HP-UX being a dead-end, so making it easier for customers to move to more main-stream operating systems in some way? Anyway, needed all sorts of other cleanup, since it seemed like a cut-n-paste from a marketing blurb, complete with the trademark symbols that we generally do not use in text. W Nowicki (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)