Talk:Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Edits
editIn Properties, it's mentioned that we get an unentangled mixed state for the partial density operator. Is this really the case? I don't really see that this is an unentangled state. Please cite — Preceding unsigned comment added by Landmark ni (talk • contribs) 02:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
The following are a few comments on this page:
Content: In the introduction, a GHZ state is introduced as a certain type of entangled quantum state, but they do not define entanglement or the definition of a qubit. This may confuse a reader who is not previously familiar with quantum mechanics. In the second paragraph of the Properties section, I would like if the article went into more depth on how the GHZ states lead to a violation of Bell's Inequality. This displays the inconsistency between classical theory and quantum theory. The section Pairwise Entanglement is extremely clear and well-written: this was the most comprehensive section of the article in my opinion. The applications section should be added to with more specific applications. This section is very vague.
Tone: The tone is neutral throughout. The Applications section is extremely short and vague. This is by far the weakest section of the article. The previous three sections are clear.
Source: The second source does not seem to be a source. It is a sentence restating where it was quoted. The fourth article also does not appear to be a source. It is a sentence describing its own reference. They do not have titles, authors, or URLs. I am a bit confused as to why these are on the references list.Ssabir19 (talk) 03:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Merge proposal
editThe GHZ experiment should be merged in to this article to create one strong article. These are just different aspects of the same topic. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do not know how I never thought about this, I have been telling me that these two should complement each other better. A merge is clearly the good way to go.--ReyHahn (talk) 08:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
