Talk:Green Party (UK)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Klbrain in topic Single page for People/Ecology/Green Party

Untitled

edit

Have they ever elected any MPs or MEPs? AnonMoos 17:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes. MEPs, no MPs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.9.55 (talk) 23:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Daventy?

edit

Should 'Daventy UK' be 'Daventry, UK'? I don't know but is this a typo that has propagated itself around a number of PEOPLE/Ecology/Green party pages?2.31.108.215 (talk) 11:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

The depiction here of the logo as circle is very odd. I was a Green Party member from 1988, and can remember clearly internal debates about changing the logo away from the 'traditional' sunflower that some felt then had been the logo for too long (see for example the sunflower at The_Ecology_Party#/media/File:Ecology_Party_Poster.gif(I can even remember that among the alternatives suggested was one of three ribbon banners blowing in the wind). The circle was neither an option, nor an old logo. Is there any evidence that the circle was ever used outside Hackney? DrArsenal (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

GP (UK) as party separate from Ecology and PEOPLE

edit

It seems to me this page (and those it links to) gives an inaccurate impression. The Green Party (UK) was not a 'successor' to the Ecology Party - the Party simply re-named itself, with the same constitution, structure, policies, etc. Can they be re-worked to sort that out? I presume that the change from 'PEOPLE' to Ecology Party was similar, in that 'Manifesto for a Sustainable Society' (as it was then called) showed continuity across the change.

By contrast, the move from Liberal Party to Liberal Democrats was a two stage process. In 1988 a new party was set up, with new aims and a new structure, called the "Social and Liberal Democrats", and later it re-named itself the Liberal Democrats (see Liberal_Democrats#Founding). The name "Social and Liberal Democrats", and the subsequent name change, is almost totally ignored by wikipedia: name changes are minor issues compared to the structural issues. DrArsenal (talk) 10:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Green Party (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Green Party (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Single page for People/Ecology/Green Party

edit

A single organisation should not have a different page for its different names, particularly a defunct organisation. Take two analogies:

  • Green Party (Ireland), which was founded in 1981 as the Ecology Alliance, became the Green Alliance in 1983, and the Green Party in 1987.
  • Radical Party (France), which went through a whole suite of names between 1901 and 2017.

The advantage for Green Party (UK) is that it provides a single page for the full history of the organisation before its 1990 division. As it's a defunct organisation, it will be limited in its growth anyway. —Iveagh Gardens (talk) 17:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Support merge, as this is one organization through a series of 20th-century name changes. The history sectional already has most of the material from the other pages, so a consolidation will remove the duplication. Klbrain (talk) 10:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Support, was the same organisation under different names. Warofdreams talk 19:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Noting that there was very little unique to merge,     Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 12:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply