Talk:Funker Vogt

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

As per discussion on Talk:Assemblage 23 and Category talk:Goth, removing from Category:Goth and adding to List of non-goth musical artists popular within goth subculture. - Korpios 02:08, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)


Yes, but if it's not goth why do goth clubs play their music? ;) (Well of course they're not goth, but that is just an observation) --68.80.190.94 02:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well, because it is popular in the goth subculture. And more industrial klubz play it than goth clubs. :)

Music played at a goth event isn't the same like goth music. The goth subculture of today has definitely no own music. --~Menorrhea 20:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Should we discuss the common melody they put into almost all of their songs that aren't remixes? The melody most prominent in Red Queen? If you've heard an album from the band you'd know what I'm talking about. Detha 13:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

I just saw the reference warning so I added some, properly referenced, info from allmusic guide. I guess there will be some strong objections on the usage of allmusic but, in absence of any other third-party reference, this is better than nothing.--Dipa1965 (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Allmusic should be fine, providing that John Bush is a staff writer. Marasmusine (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
He has contributed many of their articles for bands, afaik.--Dipa1965 (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Allmusic is the last crap. An absolutely unreliable source. Funker Vogt has nothing to do with the traditional EBM style. Their style is more aggressive and technoid. They used the atypical CS1X Yamaha Synthesizer, a dance music synth. EBM groups used synths like Oberheim Matrix 6, Yamaha DX7 and Roland SH-101. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.134.6.35 (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notability of individual albums?

edit

Each album seems to have its own article/stub. Are they so notable or should they just be redirected back to the artist? --Ifnord (talk) 20:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Funker Vogt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Funker Vogt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply