Talk:February 24

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 183.83.228.140 in topic Inaccurate WP:EVENTDOY Revert
This box: viewtalkedit
Selected anniversaries for the "On this day" section of the Main Page
Please read the selected anniversaries guidelines before editing this box.

February 24: Independence Day in Estonia (1918)

George Frideric Handel
George Frideric Handel
More anniversaries:

Untitled

edit

Samuel Colt received his patent for the "revolver" on Feb. 25, 1836 by almost every other source I checked. You might want to revisit this article.

Communist Manifesto is attributed to 2 dates

edit

Feb 24th has an entry, as has Feb 21st.

The "Communist Manifesto" entry itself says Feb 21st.

I'm not a scholar, I was just born on Feb 24th and was checking for trivia when I found this inconsistency.

Best,

Farhad.

Thanks, Farhad. I've removed the entry on Feb. 24th. -- PFHLai 01:18, 2005 Feb 16 (UTC)

Air traffic controller murder

edit
This entry does not seem to me to be globally notable enough for inclusion. It is an interesting news item, but not notable. I can't imagine that this event can be considered a social milestone, major crime or impetus for widespread change. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Long introduction

edit

Adding a long introduction to this article is not in keeping with the standard format of the date articles. The long narrative on the origin of the leap day is better left to its own article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The IP user who is responsible for this has a long history of trying to promote inaccurate ideas about Roman leap years in Wikipedia, based on outdated scholarship poorly understood. He refuses to discuss his ideas on Talk pages, and basically is incapable of accepting any ideas other than his own. In short, he's a crank. Most Wikipedia calendar articles related to this issue have been permanently semiprotected against him, but this one has slipped through the cracks until now.
I have changed the Roman discussion to something more appropriate for this type of page, and asked an admin who has been following this case to take appropriate action if it turns out to be needed, which I expect it will. --Chris Bennett (talk) 02:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Additional attempts to inject this information will be reverted on sight unless communication to consensus takes place. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 14:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

1925 Thermite Bomb

edit

Does anyone have any objection to my removing this event?

I cannot fathom that one thermite "device" could come anywhere close to doing the job. A chemist tried to dislodge an ice jam in the Allegheny River Gorge in Oil City, PA, back in 1926. After 38 attempts over several days using 8 pound shells, he couldn't come close. The Sun eventually did the job. That section of river is only 500 feet wide. The narrowest section of the St. Lawrence River near Waddington, NY, is at least 1500 feet wide (give or take).

This event is listed on many hundreds of "This Day in History" sites, but doesn't appear to be listed anywhere else. I suspect it's hogwash. Kentholke (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Semiprotection review

edit
  • 08:55, 25 April 2008 Steel protected February 24 ‎ (Problem anon [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])
  • 16:01, 15 June 2008 Wizardman changed protection level for "February 24" ‎ (No need to move. using TW [move=sysop])
  • 22:12, 15 June 2008 Wizardman changed protection level for "February 24" ‎ (Re-semiprotecting after finding out why it was originally semi'd. [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop])

The reason seems to have been edits like this. Similar problematic edits led to the semiprotection of February 29 at about the same time.

After nearly 18 months, I'd like to review this to see if it's still necessary. As well as welcoming comments from regular editors I've contacted Steel, the protecting admin. --TS 07:01, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

The discussion here gives a little insight into the protection. Protection can be removed and the situation monitored. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

See brief mention of Battle of Los Angeles Feb 24th 1942

edit

See brief mention of the battle of Los Angeles (A UFO? Caused anti aircraft guns to fire . Real or imgained 3 people died from the excite,emnt of this!) Late father an Air Raid Warden Glassell Park area of Los Angeles even obtained from a police freind neighbor a piece of whatever was shot down1 Wellmaybe!??? Also the Battle of Los Angeles went into early morning of Feb 25th 1942 as well! Teslaedsonfan (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)EdsonandreJohnsonTeslaedsonfan (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

24 FEBRUARY 1979 SOVIET INVASION OF AFGHANISTAN

edit

how is this not on there? PreserveOurHistory (talk) 14:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Inaccurate WP:EVENTDOY Revert

edit

How are these not meeting WP:EVENTDOY User:Kiwipete? If you are saying historic events shouldn't be listed then except for the Holidays and observances section, all the Events have to be deleted! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=February_24&oldid=1247206290 183.83.224.118 (talk) 11:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Suoi Bong Trang, Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance, Battle of Suoi Bong Trang These are articles regarding the respective events added. If you go through the events listed at the very top, there are so many which are of exactly identical nature which are listed. If these are removed, those have to be too! Battle of Pavia, Cudgel War, Battle of Roslin, 1949 Armistice Agreements, Treaty of Nagyvárad, Treaty of Yandabo are a few examples.
About posting at the very end, I'm not familiar with the convention but will keep that in mind going forward. There are many stale conversions that have moved nowhere, won't those be archived? Nick Levine 183.83.224.118 (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, those articles themselves do exist. But there is no article specifically about an "uncondition surrender", about "rescinded its recognition", or about "withdraw" from the battle. Regards, Kiwipete (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Battle of Roslin is an article on the date the battle was lost. Cudgel War the start date is 25 November 1596 and end date is 24 February 1597. Battle_of_Huế of 1968, the citadel fell on 24 February but neither started (31 January) or ended (2 March) on 24 February. The article was about the Battle and not the Citadel falling on 24 February.
How are you selective about the relevant date in these articles and taking them as noteworthy when you are denying the same POV in the articles that you reverted? @Kiwipete @Nick Levine 183.83.224.118 (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Still waiting to hear from you. @Kiwipete @Nick Levine --183.83.228.140 (talk) 16:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply