Talk:FBX

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 115.186.231.66 in topic Dead link

Why COI?

edit

Seems pretty neutral, WP:WHYCOI? -- samj inout 17:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I concur; doesnt appear to be a conflict of interest.

edit

I dont see any CoI. There is no praising of this product. There is no comparison to other products. Looks like just history to me. Lowave. Lowave (talk) 03:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Removing tag. -- samj inout 01:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not subjective?

edit

The warning on the header "promotes the subject in a subjective manner" - its from 2008, reading over the current text I can't find any non-subjective contents. Should this banner be removed? --Ideasman42 (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FBX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Adding Properties

edit

I'm not an artist, but i believe FBX supports builtin animations, textures and what not. That should all be mentioned along with everything it stores: Vertices, Normals, Tris, Etc..

If anybody gets the chance to do it before me, go for it ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPBotelho (talkcontribs) 21:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


edit

That last external link item is down.. Have a look at how it used to look; https://web.archive.org/web/20140314145336/http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Mont29/Foundation/FBX_File_Structure — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.186.231.66 (talk) 02:01, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply