Talk:Eudromaeosauria

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Klaporte.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

dates of the earliest Eudromaeosauria

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The earliest Eudromaeosauria is given as 143m years ago. However the earliest Velociraptorinae is given as 151m years ago. My understanding is that the former is a clade including all the latter, given that there is an inconsistency with these dates CptPugwash (talk) 22:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merge Proposals

Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments1 person in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion no support to avoid or dispute the merge. The merge was then executed. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support: The exact internal topology of eudromaeosauria is contentious to say the least. The three subfamilies are consistently found to include wildly different taxa based on which matrix is used. The only non-eponymous taxa that have stable placement in the dromaeosaur family tree are Kuru and Shri I believe. All other taxa have been found to have multiple possible classifications. In order to consolidate this discussion to a single place, rather than dispersed across 3-4 pages (WP:KEEPCONCISE, WP:REDUNDANT), I propose this merge. Furthermore, the large degree of uncertainty in the composition of the three subfamilies proposed for the merge poses neutrality issues. There is basically no scientific consensus about where these taxa go, other than within Eudromaeosauria, so a merge is the most neutral position (WP:NPOV, WP:N). A Cynical Idealist (talk) 07:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am working on a draft of the proposed merge in my sandbox here. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 07:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have updated the page to include all the requisite information from Velociraptorinae, Dromaeosaurinae, and Saurornitholestinae. The merge is now ready to execute if supported. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 08:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic