Talk:Environmental soil science

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soil Low‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Environmental soil science is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

revert

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Category:Environmental soil science is a subcategory of Category:Environmental science. the article environmental soil science is already mentioned in the environmental soil science category description, it would be redundant to place environmental soil science in the environmental soil science category also. Paleorthid 03:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I dispute my statement above based on a better understanding of policy. Note for example: In theory, if a main article is categorized correctly in its corresponding category, the use of the catmore template is redundant. from Wikipedia:Categorization FAQ. -- Paleorthid 17:18, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Would the list of fundamental and applied aspects be better suited as a bullet point list? Pthesken (talk) 23:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic