 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Move
editI've moved this page to a British English format, as per Tag below. Xyl 54 (talk) 14:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
I’ve moved this now to the format suggested at the MilHist discussion on naming convoys. Xyl 54 (talk) 11:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
|
This article is written in British English on the basis of strong national ties to the topic.
|
Comment
editThe first sources I've used mention a third convoy, HX 79A, which was also attacked by the same pack later that day, losing 7 ships; I can't find any other details or even a mention in any of the other books I've been using for this. Anybody know anything about it? Xyl 54 12:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Neither can I. Keith-264 (talk) 16:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Still waiting on additional sources Keith-264 (talk) 23:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please add a source for the final table in the article. I assume it is from one of the sources in the footnotes but I don't have them to check which it might be. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 08:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Still waiting on additional sources Keith-264 (talk) 23:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
@Donner60: 
Done (Took a while to remember which source.) Keith-264 (talk) 08:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now assessed B. Donner60 (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Got round to adding some diagrams and pics. Keith-264 (talk) 09:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)