Talk:Content-addressable memory/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Content-addressable memory. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Merge Associative memory
There is an article on Associative memory which I believe is the same concept as Content-addressable memory, and this article is better. I propose a merger with this article remaining. Gerry Ashton 14:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I have merged Associative memory and Associative storage into this article. Gerry Ashton 17:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Content-addressable memory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110805004452/http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD408276&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf to http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD408276&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110805004452/http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD408276&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf to http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD408276&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Are CAMs *currently* used for networking applications?
The article says that CAM is frequently used in networking devices, but I haven't been able to confirm that this is currently the case. I found press releases about a handful of Cypress TCAM chips in the 2002-2005 era, implemented in a 180 nm process and holding 1M entries. However, in searching for the current state of the art, I don't find any recent products.
Was that technological path abandoned? A few alternatives would be that they've been integrated into other chips instead of being sold stand-alone, that they go by another name, or that networking companies prefer to implement CAMs on FPGAs. I couldn't find evidence for those possibilities, though. 198.161.100.138 (talk) 19:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- These are currently used in the hardware forwarding information base in switches and routers. The memory is not a separate chip but now integrated in the ASICs used in this equipment. ~Kvng (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)