Talk:Collaborative innovation network

Untitled

This is a research idea that is currently expanding in notability. It has a published book describing it from a major academic publisher; this should be sufficient for inclusion in an encyclopedia. I'm removing the notability tag; if there are objections, please describe them here. - Metahacker 02:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

--

I had published a now-massively-read article on Wikipedia and "Web 3.0" but it is nowhere to be seen in the Wikipedia "Web 3.0" entry because it was said to be not notable. But before the Wikipedia Web 3.0 entry even existed, I was contacted by a person at Stanford who wanted to me to send him an updated version of the article to publish in the IEEE Transactions on Internet Computing. Frankly, I was too busy to carry on with that task. Had I actually went on and published it in the IEEE the Wikipedia "people" (admins or zealots) would have had no justifiable reason to exclude it from Wikipedia. But isn't that a joke? The "encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone" has become the encyclopedia where "everyone can be censored for no reason other than fear, paranoia, politics and the thirst for power."

There are open source projects for building a distributed file systems (DHT and OFF) and Flash 10/Flex include an easy to use API and real-time P2P media flow protocol (enabling NAT traversal/UDP hole punching to connect user to user) so it should be fairly easy to built a P2P-hosted, user rated, non-censored version of Wikipedia, where we won't have to deal with power-tripping 12 year olds or anyone for that matter. Like Google's Knol but without the ads and P2P hosted rather than "controlled" by any one entity.

http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/

Please feel free to remove this comment from here if you find it to be off topic.

Thank you.

Marc

66.218.47.100 (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Collaborative innovation network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060831062747/http://ccs.mit.edu/pgloor papers/COIN4Ethicomp.pdf to http://ccs.mit.edu/pgloor papers/COIN4Ethicomp.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081016175102/http://www.businessofgovernment.org/pdfs/NambisanReport.pdf to http://www.businessofgovernment.org/pdfs/NambisanReport.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)