Talk:Cocoon

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Seresin in topic Requested move

Is there still a perceived need to move to Cocoon (disambiguation) and make this page into a redirect to the appropriate section of Pupa? — Coren (talk) 02:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Band

edit

Check for notability?

DarkestMoonlight (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved ÷seresin 09:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


CocoonCocoon (disambiguation) — I believe that the entomological meaning of cocoon is the primary topic for the term, as already reflected in the structure of the dab page and by the incoming links—among the 80 incoming article-space links, I found only six that referred to something other than the entomological term. The dab page should be moved to Cocoon (disambiguation), and Cocoon and the redirect Cocoons should be redirected to Pupa#CocoonShelfSkewed Talk 19:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disagree - Personal preference. It irritates me that Wiki assumes I mean one thing when I don't. I much prefer to be initially taken to a DAB page, and then choose my path myself.
Besides, internal links aren't the only side of Wiki - there's no way of knowing how many users are just typing in "cocoon" as a search and what they may be looking for. a_man_alone (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose — There is more than one entomological meaning of "cocoon". The term can refer to an insect pupa, and to the cocoon that some larva build around themselves before they become pupae. These include silk moth larvae, and larvae of other moths that roll leaves or leaf litter around themselves. Separately, some spiders build a cocoon around their prey and/or their eggs. Although two of these uses of "cocoon" are lumped together in one article, that does not mean the article should occupy the ambiguous base name. --Una Smith (talk) 00:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.