Talk:Cindy Chavez

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

California: San Francisco Bay Area

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

The edits made to this page eliminate some of the obviously biased description of the recent Mayor's race, information clearly intended to portray Ms. Chavez in a negative light.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 12. The result of the discussion was no consensus; default to keep.

Chavez supporters have been vandalizing this page, removing factual information that is relevant, and replacing it with enthusiastic propaganda. Continued vigilance needed.

Recent Revisions

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey folks, lets keep this article neutral. Wikipedia is not a place to sway voters one way or the other. The recent edits to this page leading to the upcoming election on Nov. 7th are utterly irresponsible and rediculous. - Illumynite 07:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've tried to revert some of the muck here...again, but I probably missed some of it. I also found a similarly ridiculous statement on Chuck Reed's article tying him to Congressman Mark Foley's sex abuse scandal (uncited at that). I've tried to fix that as well. Frankly, both sides need to stop using Wiki as a platform for their electoral campaigns.

Yes I have noticed the muck on Chuck Reed's page as well. It's petty and childish, just as the muck on this article is petty and childish. It's rediculous, but I will keep removing it as I find it, I believe in Wikipedia and can't stand these anonymous poser's making up lies about their favored candidates opponents. Illumynite 08:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This page doesn't mention the highglights of her tenure on the City Council. It talks about the negative aspects of her campaign. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Misssanjose (talk • contribs) 19:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cindy Chavez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061018183709/http://www.philippinenews.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=3f3cd6ef19ecfdf4d8b55c5d418fb12c to http://www.philippinenews.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=3f3cd6ef19ecfdf4d8b55c5d418fb12c

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic