Talk:Che Kam Kong

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The original source for this article deals with China but not the time period in question. The source is a journal that starts in 1933, 60 some years after Che Kam Kong died. --Ian 02:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

This seems like a very late date for the first Protestant martyr. The first Protestant missionary, Robert Morrison (missionary) arrived in 1807, but by 1871 there were literally thousands of converts - at great personal risk. I'd be curious to see the source.Brian0324 21:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK, I saw the link, now to Hedley Bunton's book. Still I think this may not have been the first. Maybe the first recorded incident?Brian0324 22:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article seems biased - not presenting the facts, but also opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.23.236 (talk) 04:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic