Talk:Canada convoy protest
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canada convoy protest article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Canada convoy protest. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Canada convoy protest at the Reference desk. |
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A news item involving Canada convoy protest was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 February 2022. |  |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
 | Zexi Li was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 May 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Canada convoy protest. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Federal Court Ruling
editWhy dont they go into how the federal court of canada declared the use illegal and a break of our charter rights. Or the fact there was international support? This is such a one sided view its pathetic. Do better. 107.179.238.108 (talk) 16:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Estimates of up to $6 billion cost to the economy?
editThis is misinformation. What did they do with the freight, destroy it? No it was redirected. Pure lies. 2607:FEA8:7C9C:9680:29C0:B380:567F:6D3F (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not an expert but sitting around not delivering said freight would probably cost money to the companies waiting for it as they can't sell what they intended on time nor produce what they intended on time thus costing them money, plus it's an estimate by a source like you can disagree with it but it's just a quote. 2601:406:8480:7940:9987:554B:AE8D:CB2C (talk) 16:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- A baseless estimate has no place in an encyclopedia. This also assumes the economy was not already severely throttled because of the pandemic measures. There is no value in providing this estimate except to weaponize. This is highly bias and does not belong in a document that is supposed to be neutral. 2605:59C8:5A5:A310:A516:6986:741B:B81C (talk) 12:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The related Toronto Convoy protests were led by; Mathew Czank, Heather Davidson, Nicold Hrovat, Bruno Capela, l and Kelly Anne Wolfe. (Source I am Mathew Czank, I can and will provide photo evidence if requested) MattCZ0919 (talk) 01:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Charliehdb (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Per cent
editThe usage of per cent as opposed to percent or the % symbol seems strange to me; I don't know if there's a specific rule about this but reading it feels wrong to me. 2601:406:8480:7940:9987:554B:AE8D:CB2C (talk) 16:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Per cent is British and percent is US. Masterhatch (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Severe Partisanship
editThis article is a steaming pile of garbage. It is full of broad-brush accusations such as the claim that anyone was trying to overthrow the government (one or two people, who were not even in the spotlight, do not qualify as the entire protest!), one-sided propagandized stories used as a basis for claims, easily falsified facts that accuse the protest of being foreign influenced (a HACK was cited as a basis for facts! GiveSendGo testified in a government committee hearing that 80 to 90% of donations were all small donations originating from Canada), exaggerations and pretty much the entire thing needs to be stricken. The only thing not obviously partisan is the intro. Wikipedia has been weaponized by partisan hacks for over a decade. Nobody respects the information on this site anymore. This entire article needs to be labelled as being a partisan account of events. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:59C8:5A5:A310:A516:6986:741B:B81C (talk) 12:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- You need to be specific about information you consider false. The article says that a hack showed that most GiveSendGo donors were American, while GoFundMe said most of their donors were Canadian. These claims are included because they received considerable attention.
- The article also says that "some protestors" called for the overthrow of the government, which is true, but does not claim the entire protest called for that. The governor general's office received thousands of phone calls and countless emails asking her to fire the PM. There is no reason not mention this. TFD (talk) 13:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- The Ottawa People’s Commission documented many alleged hate crimes, including an incident in which an Ottawa resident of Asian ancestry was beaten by three convoy supporters after being asked to perform a dragon dance.[161] https://pressprogress.ca/it-was-violent-peoples-commission-report-shines-light-on-violence-harassment-and-hate-crimes-during-freedom-convoy/
- this is a extremely Parisian source that is unreliable. the fact it uses “alleged” is against wp/hearsay
- the person dancing on the tomb of the unknown soldier was not associated with the protest. This was released in a later article https://www.blacklocks.ca/convoy-allegation-disproven/
- of you compare this article with the gorge Floyd article you can see a clear difference in the way they are projected especially given the fact that one of them was the most destructive riot in U.S. history causing multiple deaths and the other has been described as “remarkably peaceful and lawful” by the Ottawa police chief https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6334125
2001:1970:4AE5:A300:93D:F2E2:6C42:F06 (talk) 00:56, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well lets see, ar the the same thing...no. So any comparison fails. And read wp:soap. Slatersteven (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- The first article in question breaks Wikipedia:Verifiabilityas the information given is a unfounded allegation and the source breaks Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
- the second it a update to the original article which fell victim to Wikipedia:Recentism
- and the third shows the majority of these media claims where bogus. This isn’t a debate, these issues went to court and the majority of these claims where proven to be untrue or blown out of proportion 2001:1970:4AE5:A300:4109:A3A5:2739:8DE5 (talk) 23:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well lets see, ar the the same thing...no. So any comparison fails. And read wp:soap. Slatersteven (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)