This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blake Brockington article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesLGBTQ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans men. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I suggest the immediate removal of Blake's "birth" name from the article. He, and most transgender people unless explicitly stated as preference, never want to be called by their birth names, and never want those names to become common knowledge. It should be policy to leave those names out in most cases.
Adding his birth name adds nothing to the article and promotes the same type of transphobic insensitivity on the part of cisgender people that killed him, and continues to kill people like him. I am asking you to consider the pain that including extremely private, sensitive information that he did not want known is currently bringing to those who knew and loved him, and to treat other transgender people with the same respect.
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose This seems more like a split proposal, but it's an oppose all the same. This is a fairly standard WP:SINGLEEVENT situation for both articles. The biography sections in both pages aren't very long, so there would be no reason to create two brief standalone pages, and neither would survive an AFD/merge discussion anyway. Nohomersryan (talk) 06:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Support rename, to match scopes of articles; oppose split because Nohomersryan is correct that stand-alone mini-articles on their deaths would just be merged back into the bios. We need an article per person not two redundant micro-articles. See WP:SIZE, WP:SPLIT, WP:SUMMARY. Unless and until one of these articles got very long and complicated there would be no cause for a split. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 10:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
