Notes

edit

Is there any sense including a paragraph about the revisions to what classes as Hand Luggage for Airplane customers in light of current terrorism fears?

It sure as heck would help me. I am flying soon and I don't know what is allowed. William Jockusch 07:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, you can't take solids, cuz you could hit people with them, and you can't take liquids, as you could explode people with them, so that just leaves gases, plasma, and dark matter.

Wouldn't that be considered small carryon, carry - on and travel accessories

The Malaysian Airlines info under Hand Luggage is a correct transcription from the source, but the source can't do its maths. When they say 115 cubic cm for the overall size, they really mean the sum of the dimensions - Multiplying up the maximum dimensions you get 56x36x23=46368cc. Are we supposed to correct such basic errors? 84.70.128.217 (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'd just remove the word "cubic", then it's correct. mmj (talk) 11:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is helpful, 84.70.128.217. It would be nice to know if this overall size limit applies to US domestic flights as well. (Of course I'm traveling day after tomorrow and have no idea if my carry-ons meet the size restriction. :)) Reading down it looks as if GuidoD intended to create a separate page for carry-ons, but I do not see a redirect to that page, alas. Katharine908 (talk) 11:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

What - no reference or disambiguation for emotional baggage?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.34.206.229 (talk) 23:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Luggage" - is it the bag's content or the bag itself?

edit

I am Australian and throughout my life I have been of the understanding that "luggage" is a general term for whatever you are carrying with you when you travel (ie, which you "lug" around), which is usually carried in bags or suitcases. However, I have noticed that it seems common among Americans for "luggage" to refer to the bags/cases that you carry luggage in and not their contents. This could be a cultural difference worth researching and referring to in this article. For example, to me it's strange to hear "I bought some luggage", as it would imply that someone bought some things to put in their bags when they travel. When you arrive in an airport here you go to "baggage claim" - not luggage. Hopefully someone else can confirm! It also seems like the idea of the bags you carry your luggage in as a status symbol is particularly American as well, though I could be wrong. mmj (talk) 11:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, in American English, although these words are often used interchangeably, the words "luggage" and "baggage" do have different connotations. "Luggage" is used to denote the physical cases in which we store our belongings, whilst "baggage" is what luggage becomes when it is placed aboard a conveyance, as in "checked baggage", as opposed to "cabin baggage". Individual items of cabin baggage are often called "carry-on luggage". A suitcase is always luggage that becomes part of baggage, but baggage may contain items that are not luggage. Gcvrsa (talk) 16:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

FWIW, you're right, in the US "luggage" is the case and not its contents.Katharine908 (talk) 11:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Left luggage" is also an unfamiliar term to me. Might be worth mentioning that it could be US-specific. mmj (talk) 11:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looks like an Australian quirk. Both UK and US English dictionaries say "Suitcases or other bags in which to pack personal belongings for travelling" "the bags and suitcases that a person carries when traveling" --Espoo (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
From the US South here, and have ALWAYS used "luggage" to mean the contents of the bags, not the bags themselves. 192.184.82.121 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:27, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

split off cabin baggage section

edit

I would like to split off the section for hand luggage / cabin bagagge as the special restrictions are worth a separate entry. Atleast in de.wiki and ru.wiki it is separate already. Any objections? ;-) ... Guidod (talk) 11:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done. Guidod (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
and set redirect links from carry-on luggage and cabin baggage. Guidod (talk) 23:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Luggage: The Colour

edit

Isn't there a colour Luggage? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sholom88 (talkcontribs) 13:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, Green is sometimes refered to as Luggage, but Green already has a Article. [[User:LoyaltyCard|LOYALTY_CARD]] 19:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

upright trunks missing

edit

There is no mention of the upright trunks common in the past, for example those with a dresser-like compartment in one half and a hanging closet in the other. There are many variants of these and their names, but Portmanteau (luggage) is one example (even though it later referred also to smaller bags). --Espoo (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Jose Caez

edit

He was the inventor of the suitcase. He was born in Puerto Rico on May 4, 1919. The suitcase was a great invention, but he sadly died on March 13, 1989. He died from a heart attack at the age of 70. He will be remembered forever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.180.43 (talk) 23:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Odd reference to "packages"

edit

Does anyone understand what this means or why it was inserted.

"A modern traveller can be expected to have packages containing clothing, toiletries, small possessions, trip necessities."

My clothing is in my luggage. And I don't have packages of anything. Kentucho (talk) 03:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Luggage (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Luggage (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

🧳 158.62.33.66 (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply