Talk:Baby Animals

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Updated News

edit

I found this profile on myspace.com the other week, It says its Dave Leslie (the owner of the profile), It seems to have photos of him that people couldnt get just off google, its at this url: http://www.myspace.com/daveleslieguitar

Fair use rationale for Image:Babyanimals-s&d.jpg

edit
 

Image:Babyanimals-s&d.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Babyanimals-selftitled.jpg

edit
 

Image:Babyanimals-selftitled.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Baby animals.jpg

edit
 

Image:Baby animals.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Woody's Hereos [sic]

edit

Saw this and wondered if it should be "Woody's Heroes", or if the current spelling is accurate. There're no refs and I know there're some lingo/spelling differences between the Aussies and the Yanks. Anyone know? -Mangler (talk) 17:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have checked a number of references and yep its just a spelling mistake - now corrected. Dan arndt (talk) 23:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Moucarl32 (talk) 09:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC) The introduction could be more detailed.Reply

Any sources/info about this?

edit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_YSRn3Z6a8 It's sitting on YouTube with really no information. It suggests something from a new album but, haven't seen anything in print. 80.101.162.155 (talk) 23:11, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Added some references

edit

I added some references/cited material from the Australian Encyclopedia of Rock and Pop, and removed some of the more personal details about Suze de Marchi from the early history section, as it was cutting it a bit close for BLP and wasn't well sourced. I'm going to dig around for citations for more of this stuff. --Skud (talk) 03:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baby Animals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply