Talk:Augusto Roa Bastos
Augusto Roa Bastos has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 13, 2021, and June 13, 2023. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2008 at the University of British Columbia. Further details are available on the course page. mariap7 and nathanlusignan thank the FA-Team and WikiProject Novels for their help. Revision summary: 4 February, 2008, 396 revisions, 10 April, 2008. GA status achieved. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Successful good article nomination
editI am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of April 12, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Pass
- 2. Factually accurate?: Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
Thank you to everyone who worked on addressing my above comments and improving this article. Thanks as well to the folks at WP:MMM, for getting us all motivated on this topic and making it happen. I suggest that the next step would be to take this article through the Peer Review process after some more copy-editing, and notify the talkpages of relevant WikiProjects, WP:MMM, WP:SOUTHAM, WP:BIOGRAPHY, and WP:LIT, when the peer review is started.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Cirt, many thanks for this, and for your own work and input in reviewing and giving advice! --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 10:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. This article is well on its way down the path towards WP:FA, but I'd really solicit input from all those various WikiProjects at the peer review. Cirt (talk) 11:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)