Talk:Assault and battery
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Woodshed in topic Should be article for assault and battery as the crime
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Should be article for assault and battery as the crime
editBy default, a search for "assault and battery" should not bring up this disambig page. The other uses as song titles are not notable enough. As this is likely a frequently searched term, we do not want to confuse and disappoint users with a lousy disambig page. In other words, the current disambig page degrades the quality of Wikipedia. The solution is to have "assault and battery" be a page about the crime but that includes a "see also" at the top that the user can click to see the current disambig page. I'll wait for a week or so for further comment and then make the changes myself if necessary. Jason Quinn (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Agree with above. "Assault and battery" seems like a notable topic deserving of its own article and is certainly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this term. Woodshed (talk) 11:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)