Wikipedia

Talk:And All That Could Have Been

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

DVD cover images

edit

Having both of these images in the article seem redundant to me; both convey almost the same information ("what does the DVD cover look like?"). What are you going for with the new picture? Is it to convey a sense of the DVD as a physical object? Or, to get a detailed view of the cover photo? Or, something else? --Tripps 02:11, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

In a way, I also think the colors are clearer on that one. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 14:21, 2005 Mar 22 (UTC)]
Trying out a scan I made as a replacement. Scanned a close-up of the photo and titles at 300dpi. Never really looked closely at the picture on this before... kinda neat. Probably should someday replace all of the covers with better scans (most of the current covers were taken from nin.com). --Tripps 17:25, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Still

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copies of Still were available for purchase were available at some of their live concerts. I can only confirm them being sold at the one on July 7, 2006 in Irvine, CA since I was there and bought a copy.

Also, the copy I purchased had a slightly different boxart. It looked more like this: http://www.merch.com/images/nin.cd.stl.jpg

They look similar except for the arrangement of the text.

75.4.19.73 12:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Moving Still to its own article

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

I think Still is easily notable enough to be listed in its own article. At the very least, it should have a more prominent section in this article. It seems nearly forgotten in all the details about And All That Could Have Been. The Myst 02:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

There is plenty of info on Still here. How more prominent can it get, and what more would people need to know other than listening to it for themselves? –Pomte 04:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
It's never been available in stores or professionally reviewed on its own. Right or wrong, this page is where it belongs. BotleySmith 20:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
It did, however, get released on its own eventually. Not to mention it's a major work by the band. Thus, all things considered, despite its originations I also believe it's worthy of its own wiki. 128.205.160.85 07:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Aatchb dlx.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Image:Aatchb dlx.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  fixed. Balthazar (talk) Balthazar (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Aatchb dvd.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Image:Aatchb dvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  fixed. Balthazar (talk) Balthazar (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Aatchb live.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Image:Aatchb live.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  fixed. Balthazar (talk) Balthazar (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Aatchb still.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Image:Aatchb still.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  fixed. Balthazar (talk) Balthazar (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on And All That Could Have Been. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on And All That Could Have Been. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on And All That Could Have Been. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:And_All_That_Could_Have_Been&oldid=1195497539"