Talk:Alphabet book

All Primers are Alphabet books?

Gee, from the redirect going from "primer(textbook)" to here, someone who isn't familiar with the terms might actually think that all primers are the same as Alphabet books (they're not). That's logically tantamount to someone typing in "fruit" and being redirected to "apple". There's also primers for mathematics, geography, geology, indeed, almost any subject. I'm becoming disillusioned at this kind of extreme austerity and minimalism at Wikipedia; this is a perfect example of how absurd it can be. Shanoman (talk) 06:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Don't moan .... fix it! This article is only as good as YOU can make it Victuallers (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

An Alphabet app is a sort of Alphabet book, but with interactive features. So this is the question: could be Primer be a digital? P.karnaukhov (talk) 14:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Alphabet book/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

#The article might be better titles American alphabet books wikification required referencing is odd Victuallers 19:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Substituted at 05:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

The article is still very American in outlook and emphasis; as if all History is teleologically directed towards the eventual appearance of the United States. This is not a good thing, especially in an article with supposedly universal application.

Nuttyskin (talk) 11:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Economic Development

Concept of economic developmen 2405:ACC0:1103:7B4E:B174:658B:94E7:D88A (talk) 13:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC)