Talk:Abbey Hill

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 22 January 2019

Make this article the primary target of Abbey Hill?

edit

In my opinion, this article ought to be the primary target of Abbey Hill and the current disambiguation article at that name be changed to Abbey Hill (disambiguation). The Abbey Hill in Somerset is just a hamlet that gets a couple of lines in another article, whereas the one in Milton Keynes is a substantial civil parish. There are no other places called "Abbey Hill". For an equivalent discussion and conclusion, see Bletchley (of which there are more than one). Any comment before I proceed? (I shall leave a note to the same effect at Curland). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If the consensus favours this change, there will of course be a template:other uses hat note at the top of the article directing readers to the disambiguation article. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
This seems sensible as the Milton Keynes settlement is considerably larger.— Rod talk 10:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I have requested the move. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 22 January 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 11:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Incidentally I've changed the hatnotes at Abbeyhill and Abbey Hills to use Abbey Hill (disambiguation), per WP:HRULES "Links to disambiguation pages should always end in "(disambiguation)", even when that version of the title is a redirect". 62.165.227.102 (talk) 08:38, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have changed this to a multi-move. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:03, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
It's been changed back to a single-page request, because Abbey Hill redirects to the already existing dab page. Placing a redirect in the second page move position causes this requested move to be malformed. Paine Ellsworth, ed.  put'r there  10:25, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.