Talk:764 (organization)

Latest comment: 11 days ago by Safety Cap in topic Should this article be protected from editing?

Should this article be protected from editing?

edit

It seems to be a frequent target for edits that aren’t vandalism per se, but do still end up needing to be reverted because they are unverified WP:OR, soapboxing, or speculation concerning 764 or the com. Given the very nature of this topic, it seems likely the article will become and remain a magnet for such things. Perhaps it would be better to indefinitely protect this article and then if new users think it should be changed, they could make their suggestions on the talk page instead. It might be worth doing this for other articles/topics of a similar nature, as well (as has already been done over at Blue Whale Challenge). Any thoughts? 173.27.3.111 (talk) 07:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

We can't protect articles prior to them attracting problems. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's attracting problems of WP:BLPCRIME — Safety Cap (talk) 21:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)Reply