Talk:2019 Indian Premier League
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Stevie fae Scotland in topic GA Review
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | 2019 Indian Premier League was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 28, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ipl 2019 auction
editIpl 2019 auction on december 18th Musha blocj (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC) if you want to get the full schedule of IPL 2019 Then You Can Visit At @ LINKSPAM— Preceding unsigned comment added by Manmohan8054 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Regarding New Tables Style
editA new table style should be use in this year IPL.(The Heading color is same as that of IPL Template)
Most Runs
| Player | Team | Mat | Inn | Runs | Ave | SR | HS | 100 | 50 | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player Name | |||||||||||
| Player Name | |||||||||||
| Player Name | |||||||||||
| Player Name | |||||||||||
| Player Name |
Most Wickets
| Player | Team | Mat | Inn | Wkts | BBI | Avg | Econ | SR | 4w | 5w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player Name | ||||||||||
| Player Name | ||||||||||
| Player Name | ||||||||||
| Player Name | ||||||||||
| Player Name |
Thanks(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 03:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC))
Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2019
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can someone please undo the changes made by Md Tashahud? He has vandalized the page with a blatant lie. 117.198.113.10 (talk) 19:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Done by someone else at some time. It looks like their changes have been reverted in one way or another.--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 18:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Issue
editThere has been an issue regarding User:Braceabby in the page. Human (talk) 04:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- What is the issue? You seem to have broken WP:3RR just because you don't like them. Spike 'em (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Issue with the map
editI think we should change the map that has been used in this article. Alok Bansal (talk) 16:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2019 Indian Premier League/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Stevie fae Scotland (talk · contribs) 15:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
editThis article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of March 28, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Resonably well written but not as much prose as I would expect.
- 2. Verifiable?: No immediate concerns with sources used, however the maintenance template needs to be dealt with prior to renomination, ie - properly cite Scorecards for each match result.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: No. It needs a format or process section outlining how the competition works, especially for the play-offs as the Page playoff system is unusual. Article also requires background, overview and aftermath sections outlining how the elections affected the season, how the competition went, the effect the betting controversy had and how the competition affected the proceeding World Cup as a minimum.
- 4. Neutral point of view?:
Pass - 5. Stable?: Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
You've got a good foundation to build on here but the article is short of GA criteria at the moment. The biggest problem is that there isn't enough prose about the competition.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)