The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
On the Casualties and losses for the israeli side it says " 87 civilians wounded" and gives 2 sources.
https://www.mdais.org/316/7004.htm Is seems to be a dead link and
https://www.jpost.com/Operation-Protective-Edge/50-days-of-Israels-Gaza-operation-Protective-Edge-by-the-numbers-372574 clearly states a different number
"According to Magen David Adom, there were 842 Israeli casualties during the fighting. Six civilians were killed by rocket or mortar strikes and 36 were wounded by shrapnel, including 10 who were seriously injured, 6 who were moderately injured, and 20 who sustained light injuries.
MDA added that another 33 people were hurt by flying glass, and that 18 people were hurt in traffic accidents that occurred when rocket warning sirens sounded, including one person who was seriously injured. Also, 159 people were injured while running for bomb shelters, and 581 were treated for shock. In addition, nine people were killed in three terrorist attacks in Israel."
Which totals to 1633. and even if you disregard casuallities not directly related to the bombings it still is 842 and not 87.
But I'd argue that running to a shelter, getting hit glass that exploded due to shrapnel and emotional damage caused by the bombings should still count and totals to 1615.
Even the body of the article argues a completely different number of civilian casualities right before the "Contents" while also quoting the same Jpost source.
"...and 469 IDF soldiers and 261 Israeli civilians were injured.[17]"
further proof that those numbers are wrong/not implied from this source is that both "87" and "261" are never mentioned in the article or are a combination of other numbers in the article. While the "469 IDF soldiers" is directly referenced in the article.
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
During the events preceding the war, 3 Israelis were killed by Palestinians and in response Israel launched an operation that killed at least 10 Palestinians, injured 130 and imprisoned 600. I think both casualties should be mentioned (or neither). Can someone explain why we would mention dead Israelis but remove mention of dead Palestinians? I think that's a violation of WP:NPOV.VR(Please ping on reply)16:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is preceding the war, and it was not carried out by Hamas, as well as it being in the West Bank so it did not involve Gaza at all. The war was started when Israel focused from operation brothers keeper (in the West Bank), to Gaza which had nothing to do with it, provoking the war The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 11:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
same reference cited for contradictory numbers of dead
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The infobox and the table "2014 Gaza War #Casualties and losses" currently seem to cite the same reference,[1] for 2,251 and 2,125 deaths, respectively, and nothing currently on the page clearly explains the difference.
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@דור פוזנר: There is no "retroactive" label being applied here. What the ICJ found was only reaffirming what has been common knowledge for decades, that Israel remained the occupying power despite the 2005 withdrawal. Why did you remove that? The opening paragraph is now half a page long. So why did you restore chronology to the opening paragraph which must be kept neutral and general per MOS:OPEN? Makeandtoss (talk) 09:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
implicit obfuscation in "The combination of Palestinian rocket attacks and Israeli airstrikes [...]"
Latest comment: 15 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The opening paragraph of the article reads "The combination of Palestinian rocket attacks and Israeli airstrikes resulted in over two thousand deaths", and while this is technically correct the article also cites multiple sources, including the one for the actual quoted segment, saying Israeli airstrikes resulted in over two thousand deaths on their own. Is this not a sort of obfuscation, as it would lead readers to believe both sides caused equal amounts of death? Maybe this should be changed to something more objective or removed entirely. TunaTM (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've changed it to "The war resulted in over two thousand deaths, the vast majority of which were Gazan Palestinians." For future reference, have a look at WP:EDITXY. That is the best way to propose changes. It is best to exclude personal opinions, and speculation about unknowable things like the effects of text on readers or the intent of authors. Sean.hoyland (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
