Talk:1948 Winter Olympics

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 80.212.169.236 in topic South Korea's flag at these Olympic Games
Good article1948 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 23, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 3, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Olympic ice hockey tournament was nearly canceled when two hockey teams from the United States arrived in St. Moritz, Switzerland, to compete in the 1948 Winter Olympic Games?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 8, 2024.

Images

edit

There are seven images used in this article. None whatsoever are free. Over and above the fact that that would be a dealbreaker at FAC, what's the justification for most of them? I can see, perhaps, the pied face, and maybe one of the brochures, but not for all the magazine covers. What's the rationale? The article would not be significantly weakened if most of them were removed. ~ Why is the medal count different in 1948 Winter Olympics and 1948 Winter Olympics medal count?

Differing silver count

edit

Does anyone know why there were 22 gold/bronze medals, but 24 silver medals awarded? (See 1948_Winter_Olympics_medal_table). 61.68.107.225 (talk) 13:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, I solved it through some analysis of the raw stats. Two bronze medals were awarded in the Men's Downhill Slalom ( 1 bronze) and then 3 silvers and no bronze were awarded in the 500m speed skating ( 2 silver, -1 bronze which offsets the previously mentioned medal). 61.68.107.225 (talk) 13:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:1948 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Truthkeeper88 (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Comment - Might not be a bad idea to modify the second sentence in the lead: ("The Games were the first to be celebrated after World War II, a twelve year hiatus.") by adding the date of the previous winter games.Truthkeeper88 (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Very good, it has been added. H1nkles citius altius fortius 20:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes -- pass.

  • Verifiable with no original research:
  • (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    (c) it contains no original research.

    Yes -- pass.

  • Broad in its coverage:
  • (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

    Comment: Not a huge problem, but in a few places focus is lost. For instance the information about Dick Button should be focused only on his participation in these Games and stop there, in my view.

    I removed information about Button's exploits after the 1948 Games and augmented information about him and the 1948 Skating competition a little bit. H1nkles citius altius fortius 18:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
    • Good. After re-reading the article, I think it would be a good idea to add as much as you know about the separate events within each discipline: e.g. break skiing into slalom, giant slalom and downhill, if those were the events that year; and give the distance events for speedskating, and so on. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  • Yes -- pass.

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • Yes -- pass.

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  • Yes -- pass.

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

    Yes -- pass.

    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

    Comment: it would be nice to see more images, but perhaps they aren't available. The image of the ice-skater is a bit of a stretch because it's not from the Games in 1948. Suggest, if not already done, a comprehensive image search on Commons.

    There isn't much in Commons though I found a shot of the ski jump. I also added a map with the location of St. Moritz. There are pictures of the town that are very nice but I don't know where I would them. I'll keep looking. H1nkles citius altius fortius 18:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
    That's better. I wouldn't add an image of St. Moritz unless it was taken during the games, and probably not much chance of finding such an image. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

    Yes -- pass. Additional comments: Will return with a few more comments. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 14:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

    Thank you for your review, I'll do a thorough image search, Olympic Games images are a bit tricky because the IOC is very strict in guarding their intellectual property. I was able to get images for the 1956 Games because of Italy's rather lax copyright laws, I'll do some research on this. I'll also focus the information on Button and use the cite you gave me. Thanks a ton! H1nkles citius altius fortius 15:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

    GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

    1. Is it reasonably well written?
      A. Prose quality:  
      B. MoS compliance:  
    2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
      A. References to sources:  
      B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
      C. No original research:  
    3. Is it broad in its coverage?
      A. Major aspects:  
      B. Focused:  
    4. Is it neutral?
      Fair representation without bias:  
    5. Is it stable?
      No edit wars, etc:  
    6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
      A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
      B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    7. Overall:
      Pass or Fail:  

    Nice job! Truthkeeper88 (talk) 18:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

    File:Barbara Ann Scott stag leap 1947.jpg Nominated for Deletion

    edit
      An image used in this article, File:Barbara Ann Scott stag leap 1947.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
    What should I do?

    Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

    • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
    • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

    This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just modified 9 external links on 1948 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

    This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

    Inconsistency with infobox & navbox

    edit

    The infobox has the 1936 games as these games predecessor. Yet the navbox has the cancelled 1944 games as these games predecessor. GoodDay (talk) 08:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Bulgarian flag at these Olympic Games

    edit

    Hello! Is it possible to correct the error concerning the Bulgarian flag at these Olympics they used the flag from 1948 until 1967. From the 27th of January which was three days prior to the games which was on January 30th check the flag again and see what you can find. Yours sincerely, Sondre --80.212.169.236 (talk) 14:15, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

    South Korea's flag at these Olympic Games

    edit

    Hello! Is it possible for you to correct the error regarding South Korea's flag at these Olympic Games they used the flag until 1948. They changed the flag in October of that year and they also used the same flag at the Summer Olympic Games. Sincerely yours, Sondre --80.212.169.236 (talk) 16:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply