User contributions for Tobit2

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

04:0404:04, 11 May 2012 diff hist −142 Adoption →Reunion: Removing Advertisment
04:0304:03, 11 May 2012 diff hist −5 Adoption →Effects on the natural mother: Natural parents is sometimes seen as a POV term. Original is less controversial. Great new section by the way.
04:0004:00, 11 May 2012 diff hist −287 Adoption →Effects on the natural mother: Unsourced
03:5903:59, 11 May 2012 diff hist −14 Adoption →Middle Ages to Modern Period: They were not necessarily children.
03:5803:58, 11 May 2012 diff hist −7 Adoption →Antiquity: Style. Why use two words when you can use one? Also, the term foundlings is more historically correct.
03:5603:56, 11 May 2012 diff hist −6 Adoption →Antiquity: the phrase before the Middle Ages is too broad; could be prehistory.
03:5403:54, 11 May 2012 diff hist −32 Adoption Reverting lede back to original. The new sentences introduced POV language (biological parent) and used terms limited to the modern period (rights, official, etc.)

02:2102:21, 29 November 2011 diff hist −215 Western culture Consolidating lede; removed irrationality reference as empirism is largely an British phenonmena.

03:4703:47, 10 April 2011 diff hist −1 m Adoption →Public perception of adoption: The sources refers to North America, the U.S., and the West, using the terms interchangabely.

14:2014:20, 19 March 2011 diff hist −130 Adoption I suggest this addition is misplaced for two reasons: 1) since the lede is a summary, the detail should be in the body of the article and in the "See Also, " and 2) modern adoption comes at the end of this lede rather than the middle.
14:1314:13, 19 March 2011 diff hist 47 Baby Scoop Era Undid revision 418840209 by 75.61.134.158 (talk) Take that issue up with the source.
14:1014:10, 19 March 2011 diff hist −18 Nation Put controversy section at end rather than upfront. It seems important to delve into the history of the word before applying it to a issue. Also changed a few title words. I suggest adding detail to the last section, e.g. Kurds and Cherokee.
14:0514:05, 19 March 2011 diff hist −592 Nation Clarifying lede, largely by removing examples which should be in the discussion; also the entire paragraph only has only source, so I just put that on the end rather than listing it thrice.
13:5913:59, 19 March 2011 diff hist −659 m Nation Removing note which is already in discussion section.
13:5713:57, 19 March 2011 diff hist −234 m Nation Removing note which is already in discussion section.

14:1214:12, 10 March 2011 diff hist −15 Adoption Deleted the word "kin" since it excluded adoption between related parties; these actually make up most adoptions.

02:3702:37, 8 March 2011 diff hist −233 Language of adoption →Positive Adoption Language: Seems to be a true statement, but I think a reference is needed for something that controversial.
02:3302:33, 8 March 2011 diff hist −431 Adoption →Adoption terminology: Does not seem relevant to me; trying to keep to the facts.
02:3102:31, 8 March 2011 diff hist −66 m Adoption →How adoptions originate: Removing what appears to be a bad tag?
02:2802:28, 8 March 2011 diff hist −905 Adoption →How adoptions originate: Last editor blanked out an entire paragraph and replaced it with what reads as advertising for U.S. adoption agencies; should be global definition and not a resource for prospective adoptive parents.

15:2815:28, 29 January 2011 diff hist −70 Adoption The last edit seemed to fit much better in the section on coercion, so I moved it and tried to integrate it better; this section needs more detail.