User contributions for Kim Bruning

Results for Kim Bruning talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log

A user with 20,995 edits. Account created on 7 December 2003.

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

17:3817:38, 11 November 2024 diff hist −10 User:Kim Bruning - INDEX current

20:2420:24, 27 September 2024 diff hist −150 Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules →Shu ha ri: nvm Tag: Manual revert
20:2220:22, 27 September 2024 diff hist 150 Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules →Shu ha ri: * Ah, Wikipedia:Levels of competence . Fair. --~~~~ Tag: Reverted
20:1820:18, 27 September 2024 diff hist 16 Ignore all rules →See also
20:1420:14, 27 September 2024 diff hist 114 Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules →Shu ha ri
20:1320:13, 27 September 2024 diff hist 236 Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules Shu ha ri
20:1220:12, 27 September 2024 diff hist 16 Wikipedia:Ignore all rules shu ha ri wasn't mentioned yet, nor in the archives: "follow the rules, break the rules, transcend the rules" Tag: Reverted

14:5414:54, 11 March 2024 diff hist −941 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": different answer entirely I'm going to have to go off and think more ;-)
14:3114:31, 11 March 2024 diff hist 466 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all"
14:2014:20, 11 March 2024 diff hist 611 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": I agree that scientists couch their criticisms and use polite language.

14:0414:04, 10 March 2024 diff hist 788 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": thanks to Phlsph7 , accidentally lost a cite?
13:5713:57, 10 March 2024 diff hist −33 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical and better-than-average effect: I don't think one can quite get away with "has been criticized on methodological grounds" when it's Dunning himself doing the criticizing in a response article. ;-)

15:0515:05, 9 March 2024 diff hist 24 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": meanwhile
15:0415:04, 9 March 2024 diff hist 266 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": Reply Tag: Reply
10:3510:35, 9 March 2024 diff hist 370 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
10:1610:16, 9 March 2024 diff hist 107 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: I'm still not happy with this wording, but it's a lot better
09:5809:58, 9 March 2024 diff hist 5 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: should/could
09:5709:57, 9 March 2024 diff hist 38 Dunning–Kruger effect More careful wording to stress that According to Jarry's Reporting/ summary of the situation is it fully debunked. (and that Gaze is a bit more nuanced: people's interpretation of the paper has been overbroad, but a narrow reading may still be correct. )
02:2202:22, 9 March 2024 diff hist 8 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: <s></s>
02:1902:19, 9 March 2024 diff hist 376 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
02:1502:15, 9 March 2024 diff hist −27 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: I'm really not happy with this wording, but it does meet minimum requirements to be left in .. I *think*.
01:3901:39, 9 March 2024 diff hist 223 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: sign again, since I've edited my comment based on updates
01:3201:32, 9 March 2024 diff hist −24 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: more npov wording/ (was slightly misleading)
01:3201:32, 9 March 2024 diff hist −55 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: found 2 different references to same article
01:2201:22, 9 March 2024 diff hist 70 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical
01:1801:18, 9 March 2024 diff hist 200 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
01:1601:16, 9 March 2024 diff hist −89 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect re - sign with logged in

05:3905:39, 28 November 2023 diff hist 2 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: sp
05:3905:39, 28 November 2023 diff hist 135 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: reword some more
05:2305:23, 28 November 2023 diff hist 1 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
05:2205:22, 28 November 2023 diff hist −234 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: rewording to be closer to what the paper actually says.
05:1405:14, 28 November 2023 diff hist 26 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: ref
04:5704:57, 28 November 2023 diff hist 680 User talk:Gwern →For some reason I'm discussing minutiae of Dunning-Kruger, and I blame you.: new section Tag: New topic
04:4104:41, 28 November 2023 diff hist 531 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: replying to Constant314: Scientists often word things very carefully.
04:2704:27, 28 November 2023 diff hist 368 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply

13:2313:23, 27 November 2023 diff hist 0 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
13:2013:20, 27 November 2023 diff hist 34 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
13:1813:18, 27 November 2023 diff hist 639 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
13:0613:06, 27 November 2023 diff hist 1,983 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
11:4811:48, 27 November 2023 diff hist 55 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
11:4611:46, 27 November 2023 diff hist −37 Dunning–Kruger effect And... read the papers through and found somewhat more careful wording. Tag: Reverted
11:4111:41, 27 November 2023 diff hist −5 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
11:4011:40, 27 November 2023 diff hist 852 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Annnd... just came back from reading papers
11:2411:24, 27 November 2023 diff hist 643 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Additional (possibly redundant) request for more detail here.
11:1811:18, 27 November 2023 diff hist 1,023 Dunning–Kruger effect rv (1RR/BRD) Re-checking contents of each of the papers, I'm not entirely sure why refs were removed/reverted. I left a note on the talk page as well. I'd be interested to see what the explicit issues are (on the talk page) Tags: Manual revert Reverted harv-error
00:3900:39, 27 November 2023 diff hist 1 m Dunning–Kruger effect full stop Tag: Reverted
00:3800:38, 27 November 2023 diff hist 22 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: why I say that
00:3700:37, 27 November 2023 diff hist 51 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
00:3500:35, 27 November 2023 diff hist −2 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: better wording
00:3400:34, 27 November 2023 diff hist 947 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kim_Bruning"