User contributions for 121.210.234.34
Results for 121.210.234.34 talk block log logs global block log filter log
12 December 2011
- 14:3214:32, 12 December 2011 diff hist −6,162 GetUp! Undid revision 465458993 by Sven Manguard (talk) Removal of content was explained - reason is clearly contentious & opinionated material with obvious party-political intent
- 14:3014:30, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1,047 Graeme Wood (businessman) Undid revision 465460883 by Brandonfarris (talk) Again, removal of blatantly contentious content - clear and obvious Liberal Party slant here
- 14:2814:28, 12 December 2011 diff hist −306 Jeremy Rapke Understand reasoning Yunshui, but still looks contentious IMO, given the apparent agenda of 'brandonfarris' involving Campbell around this place, incl. attacks on subjects written about by Campbell, in the form of new articles & various edits Tag: references removed
- 14:1814:18, 12 December 2011 diff hist −4 Wotif Undid revision 465460522 by Brandonfarris (talk) Again, no reason for change
- 14:1814:18, 12 December 2011 diff hist −26 Wotif Undid revision 465460582 by Brandonfarris (talk) Again, no reason for change
- 14:1714:17, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1,047 Graeme Wood (businessman) Removal of blatantly contentious content - clear and obvious Liberal Party slant here
- 14:1514:15, 12 December 2011 diff hist −32 David Madden (entrepreneur) Undid revision 465452677 by Brandonfarris (talk) Revert. This is not autobiographical.
- 14:1014:10, 12 December 2011 diff hist −624 Jeremy Rapke Undid revision 465486352 by Phileasson (talk) Again, removing prejudicial, contentious & non-neutral content, and the "notability" tag. This article does not meet that criteria Tag: references removed
- 14:0814:08, 12 December 2011 diff hist −4 Wotif Undid revision 465457612 by Brandonfarris (talk) No reason for change
- 14:0814:08, 12 December 2011 diff hist −25 Wotif Undid revision 465457730 by Brandonfarris (talk) No reason for change
- 14:0714:07, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1 Wotif Undid revision 465457792 by Brandonfarris (talk) No reason for change
- 14:0514:05, 12 December 2011 diff hist −62 Graeme Wood (businessman) Removal of contentious, obviously party-political and non-neutral content
- 14:0314:03, 12 December 2011 diff hist −33 Jeremy Rapke tidying up
- 14:0214:02, 12 December 2011 diff hist −591 Jeremy Rapke Removal of prejudicial, contentious and non-neutral content, and removal of the "notability" tag. This article does not meet that criteria Tag: references removed
- 13:5213:52, 12 December 2011 diff hist −777 Eric Beecher Removing "notability" tag. This does not meet the criteria. Also removal of any non-neutral content Tag: references removed
- 13:4913:49, 12 December 2011 diff hist −621 GetUp! Removal of further blatantly contentious, party-political and opinionated material Tag: references removed
- 13:4513:45, 12 December 2011 diff hist −28 James Campbell (journalist) Removal of more details not to do with the person being discussed
- 13:4113:41, 12 December 2011 diff hist −627 Jeremy Rapke Contentious, highly prejudicial. And this is certainly not a page that deserves marking as "notable". Tag: references removed
- 13:1213:12, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1,929 James Campbell (journalist) Intentional non-neutral slant in some language used, and content which is not biographical, but rather targeting other people and organisations Tag: references removed
- 13:0913:09, 12 December 2011 diff hist −2,936 Crikey Contentious and prejudicial. This is clearly not neutral content Tag: section blanking
- 13:0513:05, 12 December 2011 diff hist −193 Helen Shardey Undid revision 465450445 by Brandonfarris (talk) Clearly not neutral, and source highly questionable Tag: references removed
- 13:0413:04, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1,664 Eric Beecher Undid revision 465452400 by Brandonfarris (talk) - Contentious material with an obvious political bias, as established already Tag: references removed
- 13:0313:03, 12 December 2011 diff hist −676 Malcolm Fraser Undid revision 465452518 by Brandonfarris (talk) - Clear that this, as with other edits by this member, is intentionally prejudicial and politically biased
- 13:0213:02, 12 December 2011 diff hist −32 David Madden (entrepreneur) Undid revision 465444664 by Brandonfarris (talk)
- 13:0113:01, 12 December 2011 diff hist −4,208 GetUp! Not neutral and highly prejudicial, again
- 13:0013:00, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1,333 GetUp! Highly prejudicial and non-neutral content of a similar nature to the previous Tag: section blanking
- 12:5812:58, 12 December 2011 diff hist −5,347 GetUp! Removing irrelevant, intentionally prejudicial, and otherwise non-neutral content, including the particularly obviously biased content sourced from Andrew Bolt
- 12:5612:56, 12 December 2011 diff hist 11 Mark Latham Undid revision 465443818 by Brandonfarris (talk)
- 12:5612:56, 12 December 2011 diff hist −12 GetUp! Undid revision 465444225 by Brandonfarris (talk)
- 12:5612:56, 12 December 2011 diff hist −676 Malcolm Fraser Undid revision 465445863 by Brandonfarris (talk)
- 12:5512:55, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1,664 Eric Beecher Undid revision 465450366 by Brandonfarris (talk) Tag: references removed
- 12:5412:54, 12 December 2011 diff hist −3,899 Crikey Removing irrelevant, intentionally prejudicial, and otherwise non-neutral content Tag: section blanking
- 12:4912:49, 12 December 2011 diff hist 7 Crikey Undid revision 465451160 by Brandonfarris (talk)
- 12:4812:48, 12 December 2011 diff hist −38 Crikey Undid revision 465451196 by Brandonfarris (talk)
- 12:4512:45, 12 December 2011 diff hist 7 Crikey Undid revision 465269605 by Brandonfarris (talk)
- 12:4512:45, 12 December 2011 diff hist −38 Crikey Undid revision 465269669 by Brandonfarris (talk)
- 12:3912:39, 12 December 2011 diff hist −193 Helen Shardey Undid revision 465415119 by Brandonfarris (talk) Tag: references removed
- 12:3612:36, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1,664 Eric Beecher Removing weird opinionated assertions, including those sourced by Andrew Bolt, which have no place in a factual article about somebody. It's clear this was a swiftie edit done by a Bolt follower simply because he doesn't like Beecher Tag: references removed
- 03:2803:28, 12 December 2011 diff hist −476 Peter Blunden Weird POV assertion at the end removed
- 03:2603:26, 12 December 2011 diff hist −193 Helen Shardey No edit summary Tag: references removed
- 03:1503:15, 12 December 2011 diff hist −639 Nicola Gobbo No edit summary
- 03:1403:14, 12 December 2011 diff hist −321 Nicola Gobbo No edit summary Tag: references removed
- 03:1303:13, 12 December 2011 diff hist −5,628 Nicola Gobbo Removal of content which is intentionally prejudicial and one-sided in nature
- 03:0103:01, 12 December 2011 diff hist −1,526 James Campbell (journalist) Removing opinionated language and other text not specifically about the person Tag: references removed
- 02:5302:53, 12 December 2011 diff hist −802 Eric Beecher Remove opinionated assertions by Andrew Bolt, which have no place in a factual article about somebody. It's clear this was a swiftie edit done by a Bolt follower simply because he doesn't like Beecher Tag: references removed
1 December 2011
- 12:5712:57, 1 December 2011 diff hist 0 American Samoa national football team No edit summary
- 12:5612:56, 1 December 2011 diff hist −6 American Samoa national football team No edit summary
- 12:5212:52, 1 December 2011 diff hist 8 American Samoa national football team No edit summary
- 12:4712:47, 1 December 2011 diff hist 2 American Samoa national football team No edit summary
- 12:4612:46, 1 December 2011 diff hist 506 American Samoa national football team No edit summary