User contributions for 114.229.252.169

30 April 2012

• 16:4716:47, 30 April 2012 diff hist −5,097 User talk:114.229.252.169 ←Blanked the page
• 16:4616:46, 30 April 2012 diff hist −5,097 User talk:114.229.252.169 ←Blanked the page
• 16:3316:33, 30 April 2012 diff hist 38 Special forces rv vandalism
• 16:3316:33, 30 April 2012 diff hist 240 SWAT To ALR, please provide your sources showing that SWAT is not Special Operations. I have provided my source showing that SWAT is Special Operations, read it here: http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 16:1916:19, 30 April 2012 diff hist 240 SWAT Wikipedia pages are based upon sourced information and right now the sourced information proves indisputably that SWAT is a Special Operations unit, you can confirm for yourself here http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 16:1616:16, 30 April 2012 diff hist 38 Special forces No edit summary
• 16:0816:08, 30 April 2012 diff hist 52 Swat No edit summary
• 16:0516:05, 30 April 2012 diff hist 719 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection →{{la|SWAT}}
• 16:0116:01, 30 April 2012 diff hist 338 User talk:114.229.252.169 http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 16:0016:00, 30 April 2012 diff hist 272 User talk:114.229.252.169 http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 15:5815:58, 30 April 2012 diff hist 446 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism →User-reported
• 15:5415:54, 30 April 2012 diff hist 240 SWAT My source is from the reputable site www.SpecialOperations.com which lists units according to the U.S. Department of Defense. But you have not provided any source supporting your personal beliefs. SWAT is Special Operations and this is the fact!
• 15:5215:52, 30 April 2012 diff hist 38 Special forces No edit summary
• 15:5115:51, 30 April 2012 diff hist 589 User talk:114.229.252.169 http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 15:4815:48, 30 April 2012 diff hist 240 SWAT to Niteshift, I invite you to discuss and show me reputable sources saying specifically "SWAT is not Special Operations or Special Forces". But until you can provide evidence to back up your personal belief system and opinions, we must use sources!!
• 15:3915:39, 30 April 2012 diff hist 15 SWAT SWAT is SPECOPS http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 15:3715:37, 30 April 2012 diff hist 4 SWAT But just to make a compromise for you since you are obviously ignorant of SWAT, I am changing Special Forces to Special Operations so that it matches the source: http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 15:3515:35, 30 April 2012 diff hist 301 User talk:114.229.252.169 SWAT is SPECOPS, read it for yourself here: http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 15:3215:32, 30 April 2012 diff hist 221 SWAT You are obviously ignorant of what Special Forces are: Special Forces is the same thing as Special Operations!!! This reference is indisputable for anyone reading, http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html STOP vandalizing this page!
• 15:3015:30, 30 April 2012 diff hist 40 Special forces rv vandalism
• 14:4714:47, 30 April 2012 diff hist 221 SWAT ALR is incorrect, show me some references supporting your beliefs!! Here is my reputable source showing that SWAT is officially recognized as a Special Forces unit, no way to deny this fact!! http://www.specialoperations.com/Domestic/default.html
• 14:3614:36, 30 April 2012 diff hist 40 Special forces rv vandalism
• 14:3414:34, 30 April 2012 diff hist 221 SWAT Here is a reputable reference that specifically states SWAT is Special Operations, ALR is vandalizing this page with his personal opinions. ALR needs to provide references showing that SWAT "is not" SPECOPS according to his personal beliefs!!!