Planetary engineering is the development and application of technology for the purpose of influencing the environment of a planet. Planetary engineering encompasses a variety of methods such as terraforming, seeding, and geoengineering.

Widely discussed in the scientific community, terraforming refers to the alteration of other planets to create a habitable environment for terrestrial life. Seeding refers to the introduction of life from Earth to habitable planets. Geoengineering refers to the engineering of a planet's climate, and has already been applied on Earth. Each of these methods are composed of varying approaches and possess differing levels of feasibility and ethical concern.

Terraforming

edit
 
Projected temperature and precipitation changes relative to preindustrial; end-of-century response without (a) and with (b) geoengineering to avoid temperature rise above 1.5C.[1]
 
A theoretical design for a power station on Mars. Terraforming designs are not yet planned.

Terraforming is the process of modifying the atmosphere, temperature, surface topography or ecology of a planet, moon, or other body in order to replicate the environment of Earth.

Technologies

edit

A common object of discussion on potential terraforming is the planet Mars. To terraform Mars, humans would need to create a new atmosphere, due to the planet's high carbon dioxide concentration and low atmospheric pressure. This would be possible by introducing more greenhouse gases to below "freezing point from indigenous materials".[2] To terraform Venus, carbon dioxide would need to be converted to graphite since Venus receives twice as much sunlight as Earth. This process is only possible if the greenhouse effect is removed with the use of "high-altitude absorbing fine particles" or a sun shield, creating a more habitable Venus.[2]

NASA has defined categories of habitability systems and technologies for terraforming to be feasible.[3] These topics include creating power-efficient systems for preserving and packaging  food for crews, preparing and cooking foods, dispensing water, and developing facilities for rest, trash and recycling, and areas for crew hygiene and rest.[3]

Feasibility

edit

A variety of planetary engineering challenges stand in the way of terraforming efforts. The atmospheric terraforming of Mars, for example, would require "significant quantities of gas" to be added to the Martian atmosphere.[4] This gas has been thought to be stored in solid and liquid form within Mars' polar ice caps and underground reservoirs. It is unlikely, however, that enough CO2 for sufficient atmospheric change is present within Mars' polar deposits, and liquid CO2 could only be present at warmer temperatures "deep within the crust".[4] Furthermore, sublimating the entire volume of Mars' polar caps would increase its current atmospheric pressure to 15 millibar, where an increase to around 1000 millibar would be required for habitability.[4] For reference, Earth's average sea-level pressure is 1013.25 mbar.

First formally proposed by astrophysicist Carl Sagan, the terraforming of Venus has since been discussed through methods such as organic molecule-induced carbon conversion, sun reflection, increasing planetary spin, and various chemical means.[5] Due to the high presence of sulfuric acid and solar wind on Venus, which are harmful to organic environments, organic methods of carbon conversion have been found unfeasible.[5] Other methods, such as solar shading, hydrogen bombardment, and magnesium-calcium bombardment are theoretically sound but would require large-scale resources and space technologies not yet available to humans.[5]

Ethical considerations

edit

While successful terraforming would allow life to prosper on other planets, philosophers have debated whether this practice is morally sound. Certain ethics experts suggest that planets like Mars hold an intrinsic value independent of their utility to humanity and should therefore be free from human interference.[6] Also, some argue that through the steps that are necessary to make Mars habitable - such as fusion reactors, space-based solar-powered lasers, or spreading a thin layer of soot on Mars' polar ice caps - would deteriorate the current aesthetic value that Mars possesses.[7] This calls into question humanity's intrinsic ethical and moral values, as it raises the question of whether humanity is willing to eradicate the current ecosystem of another planet for their benefit.[8] Through this ethical framework, terraforming attempts on these planets could be seen to threaten their intrinsically valuable environments, rendering these efforts unethical.[6]

Seeding

edit
 
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope took the picture of Mars on June 26, 2001, when Mars was approximately 68 million kilometers (43 million miles) from Earth — the closest Mars has ever been to Earth since 1988. Hubble can see details as small as 16 kilometers (10 miles) across. The colors have been carefully balanced to give a realistic view of Mars' hues as they might appear through a telescope. Especially striking is the large amount of seasonal dust storm activity seen in this image. One large storm system is churning high above the northern polar cap (top of image), and a smaller dust storm cloud can be seen nearby. Another large dust storm is spilling out of the giant Hellas impact basin in the Southern Hemisphere (lower right) exploration.[9]

Environmental considerations

edit

Mars is the primary subject of discussion for seeding. Locations for seeding are chosen based on atmospheric temperature, air pressure, existence of harmful radiation, and availability of natural resources, such as water and other compounds essential to terrestrial life.[10]

Developing microorganisms for seeding

edit

Natural or engineered microorganisms must be created or discovered that can withstand the harsh environments of Mars. The first organisms used must be able to survive exposure to ionizing radiation and the high concentration of CO2 present in the Martian atmosphere.[10] Later organisms such as multicellular plants must be able to withstand the freezing temperatures, withstand high CO2 levels, and produce significant amounts of O2.

Microorganisms provide significant advantages over non-biological mechanisms. They are self-replicating, negating the needs to either transport or manufacture large machinery to the surface of Mars. They can also perform complicated chemical reactions with little maintenance to realize planet-scale terraforming.[11]

Climate engineering

edit
 
Impression of the hypothetical phrases of the terraforming of Mars

Climate engineering is a form of planetary engineering which involves the process of deliberate and large-scale alteration of the Earth's climate system to combat climate change.[12] Examples of geoengineering are carbon dioxide removal (CDR), which removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and solar radiation modification (SRM) to reflect solar energy to space.[12][13] Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) has multiple practices, the simplest being reforestation, to more complex processes such as direct air capture.[12][14] The latter is rather difficult to deploy on an industrial scale, for high costs and substantial energy usage would be some aspects to address.[12]

Examples of SRM include stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) and marine cloud brightening (MCB).[12] When a volcano erupts, small particles known as aerosols proliferate throughout the atmosphere, reflecting the sun's energy back into space.[12][15] This results in a cooling effect, and humanity could conceivably inject these aerosols into the stratosphere, spurring large-scale cooling.[12][15]

 
Visible ship tracks in the Northern Pacific, on 4 March 2009. On an overcast day, the clouds look uniform. However, NASA MODIS images' sensor reveals long, skinny trails of brighter clouds hidden within. As ships travel across the ocean, pollution in the ships' exhaust create more cloud drops that are smaller in size, resulting in even brighter clouds.

One proposal for MCB involves spraying a vapor into low-laying sea clouds, creating more cloud condensation nuclei.[16] This would in theory result in the cloud becoming whiter, and reflecting light more efficiently.[16]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ MacMartin, Douglas G.; Ricke, Katharine L.; Keith, David W. (13 May 2018). "Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 376 (2119): 20160454. Bibcode:2018RSPTA.37660454M. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0454. PMC 5897825. PMID 29610384.
  2. ^ a b Pollack, James B.; Sagan, Carl (1993). "Planetary engineering" (PDF). In Lewis, John S.; Matthews, Mildred Shapley; Guerrieri, Mary L. (eds.). Resources of Near-Earth Space. University of Arizona Press. pp. 921–950. ISBN 978-0-8165-1404-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 June 2010.
  3. ^ a b "Habitats, Habitability, and Human Factors". NASA SBIR & STTR Program. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 5 November 2021.
  4. ^ a b c Jakosky, Bruce M.; Edwards, Christopher S. (August 2018). "Inventory of CO2 available for terraforming Mars". Nature Astronomy. 2 (8): 634–639. Bibcode:2018NatAs...2..634J. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0529-6. S2CID 133894463.2 available for terraforming Mars&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=8&rft.pages=634-639&rft.date=2018-08&rft_id=https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:133894463#id-name=S2CID&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41550-018-0529-6&rft_id=info:bibcode/2018NatAs...2..634J&rft.aulast=Jakosky&rft.aufirst=Bruce M.&rft.au=Edwards, Christopher S.&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Planetary engineering" class="Z3988">
  5. ^ a b c Fogg, M. J. (1987). "The Terraforming of Venus". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 40: 551–564. Bibcode:1987JBIS...40..551F.
  6. ^ a b "The Ethics of Terraforming | Issue 38". Philosophy Now. Archived from the original on 5 November 2021. Retrieved 5 November 2021.
  7. ^ Sparrow, Robert (Fall 1999). "The Ethics of Terraforming" (PDF). Environmental Ethics. 21 (3): 227–245. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9920-4_124. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  8. ^ Sparrow, Robert (Fall 1999). "The Ethics of Terraforming" (PDF). Environmental Ethics. 21 (3): 227–245. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9920-4_124. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  9. ^ Lopez-Arreguin, A.J.R.; Montenegro, S. (September 2019). "Improving engineering models of terramechanics for planetary exploration". Results in Engineering. 3: 100027. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100027. S2CID 202783328.
  10. ^ a b Todd, Paul (August 2006). "Planetary biology and terraforming". Gravitational and Space Biology. 19 (2): 79–85. Gale A176373142.
  11. ^ Conde-Pueyo, Nuria; Vidiella, Blai; Sardanyés, Josep; Berdugo, Miguel; Maestre, Fernando T.; de Lorenzo, Victor; Solé, Ricard (9 February 2020). "Synthetic Biology for Terraformation Lessons from Mars, Earth, and the Microbiome". Life. 10 (2): 14. Bibcode:2020Life...10...14C. doi:10.3390/life10020014. PMC 7175242. PMID 32050455.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g "What is Climate Engineering?". Union of Concerned Scientists. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
  13. ^ "Explainer: Six ideas to limit global warming with solar geoengineering". Carbon Brief. 9 May 2018. Archived from the original on 1 November 2021. Retrieved 1 November 2021.
  14. ^ "Effectively removing CO2 from the atmosphere". ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2021.2 from the atmosphere&rft_id=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/08/210813100255.htm&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Planetary engineering" class="Z3988">
  15. ^ a b "Volcanoes Can Affect Climate". USGS. Archived from the original on 31 October 2021. Retrieved 1 November 2021.
  16. ^ a b "Proposed Geoengineering Technologies". Geoengineering Monitor. Archived from the original on 3 November 2021. Retrieved 3 November 2021.

Further reading

edit
edit