1989 Loma Prieta earthquake

(Redirected from Loma Prieta earthquake)

On October 17, 1989, at 5:04 p.m. local time, the Loma Prieta earthquake occurred at the Central Coast of California. The shock was centered in The Forest of Nisene Marks State Park in Santa Cruz County, approximately 10 mi (16 km) northeast of Santa Cruz on a section of the San Andreas Fault System and was named for the nearby Loma Prieta Peak in the Santa Cruz Mountains. With an Mw magnitude of 6.9[10] and a maximum Modified Mercalli intensity of IX (Violent), the shock was responsible for 63 deaths and 3,757 injuries. The Loma Prieta segment of the San Andreas Fault System had been relatively inactive since the 1906 San Francisco earthquake (to the degree that it was designated a seismic gap) until two moderate foreshocks occurred in June 1988 and again in August 1989.

1989 Loma Prieta earthquake
1989 Loma Prieta earthquake is located in California
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
Oakland
Oakland
Salinas
Salinas
1989 Loma Prieta earthquake
UTC time1989-10-18 00:04:14
ISC event389808
USGS-ANSSComCat
Local dateOctober 17, 1989 (1989-10-17)
Local time17:04:15 PDT[1]
Duration8–15 seconds[2]
Magnitude6.9 Mw, 7.2 MS [3]
Depth19 km (12 mi)[4]
Epicenter37°02′N 121°53′W / 37.04°N 121.88°W / 37.04; -121.88[1]
TypeOblique-slip reverse
Areas affectedCentral Coast (California)
San Francisco Bay Area
United States
Total damage$5.6–6 billion[1][5] (equivalent to $13.8–14.7 billion today)
Max. intensityMMI IX (Violent)[1]
Peak acceleration0.65 g (at epicenter)[2]
TsunamiYes[6][7]
Landslides1,000–4,000[1][2]
Foreshocks5.3 ML June 27, 1988[8]
5.4 ML August 8, 1989[8]
Casualties63 killed, 3,757 injured[1][9]

Damage was heavy in Santa Cruz County and less so to the south in Monterey County, but effects extended well to the north into the San Francisco Bay Area, both on the San Francisco Peninsula and across the bay in Oakland. No surface faulting occurred, though many other ground failures and landslides were present, especially in the Summit area of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Liquefaction was also a significant issue, especially in the heavily damaged Marina District of San Francisco, but its effects were also seen in the East Bay, and near the shore of Monterey Bay, where a non-destructive tsunami was also observed.[11]

Because it happened during a national live broadcast of the 1989 World Series, the annual championship series of Major League Baseball, taking place between Bay Area teams San Francisco Giants and the Oakland Athletics, it is sometimes referred to as the "World Series earthquake", with the championship games of the year being referred to as the "Earthquake Series". Rush-hour traffic on the Bay Area freeways was much lighter than normal because the game, being played at Candlestick Park in San Francisco, was about to begin, and this may have prevented a larger loss of life, as several of the Bay Area's major transportation structures suffered catastrophic failures. The collapse of a section of the double-deck Nimitz Freeway in Oakland was the site of the largest number of casualties for the event, but the collapse of human-made structures and other related accidents contributed to casualties occurring in San Francisco, Los Gatos, and Santa Cruz.

Background

edit

The history of earthquake investigations in California has been largely focused on the San Andreas Fault system because of its strong influence in the state as the boundary between the Pacific plate and the North American plate; it is the most studied fault on Earth. Andrew Lawson, a geologist from the University of California, Berkeley, had named the fault after the San Andreas Lake (prior to the occurrence of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake) and later led an investigation into that event. The San Andreas Fault ruptured for a length of 290 mi (470 km) during the 1906 shock, both to the north of San Francisco and to the south in the Santa Cruz Mountains region. Several long term forecasts for a large shock along the San Andreas Fault in that area had been made public prior to 1989 (the event and its aftershocks occurred within a recognized seismic gap) but the earthquake that transpired was not what had been anticipated. The 1989 Loma Prieta event originated on an undiscovered oblique-slip reverse fault that is located adjacent to the San Andreas Fault.[12]

Forecasts

edit
 
Loma Prieta Peak in the Santa Cruz Mountains

Since many forecasts had been presented for the region near Loma Prieta, seismologists were not taken by surprise by the October 1989 event. Between 1910 and 1989 there were 20 widely varying forecasts that were announced, with some that were highly specific, covering multiple aspects of an event, while others were less complete and vague. With a M6.5 event on the San Juan Bautista segment, or an M7 event on the San Francisco Peninsula segment, United States Geological Survey (USGS) seismologist Allan Lindh's 1983 forecasted rupture length of 25 miles (40 km) (starting near Pajaro Gap, and continuing to the northwest) for the San Juan Bautista segment nearly matched the actual rupture length of the 1989 event. An updated forecast was presented in 1988, at which time Lindh took the opportunity to assign a new name to the San Juan Bautista segment – the Loma Prieta segment.[13]

In early 1988, the Working Group for California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) made several statements regarding their forecasts for the 225 mi (360 km) northern San Andreas Fault segment, the 56 mi (90 km) San Francisco Peninsula segment, and a 18.8–22 mi (30–35 km) portion of that segment which was referred to as the southern Santa Cruz Mountains segment. The thirty year probability for one or more M7 earthquakes in the study area was given as 50%, but because of a lack of information and low confidence, a 30% probability was assigned to the Southern Santa Cruz Mountains segment. Two moderate shocks, referred to as the Lake Elsman earthquakes by the USGS, occurred in the Santa Cruz Mountains region in June 1988 and again in August 1989. Following each event, the State office of Emergency Services issued (for the first time in Bay Area history) short term advisories for a possible large earthquake, which meant there was "a slightly increased likelihood of an M6.5 event on the Santa Cruz Mountains segment of the San Andreas fault". The advisories following the two Lake Elsman events were issued in part because of the statements made by WGCEP and because they were two of the three largest shocks to occur along the 1906 earthquake's rupture zone since 1914.[8][13]

Foreshocks

edit
USGS ShakeMaps showing similar intensity patterns for the June 1988 (left) and August 1989 events near Lake Elsman in the Santa Cruz Mountains

The ML 5.3 June 1988 and the ML  5.4 August 1989 events also occurred on previously unknown oblique reverse faults and were within 3 mi (4.8 km) of the M6.9 Loma Prieta mainshock epicenter, near the intersection of the San Andreas and Sargent faults. Total displacement for these shocks was relatively small (approximately 4 in (100 mm) of strike-slip and substantially less reverse-slip) and although they occurred on separate faults and well before the mainshock, a group of seismologists considered these to be foreshocks because of when and where they occurred relative to the main event. Each event's aftershock sequence and effect on stress drop was closely examined, and their study indicated that the shocks affected the mainshock's rupture process. Following the August 8, 1989, shock, in anticipation of an upcoming large earthquake, staff at the University of California, Santa Cruz deployed four accelerometers in the area, which were positioned at the UCSC campus, two residences in Santa Cruz, and a home in Los Gatos. Unlike other nearby (high gain) seismographs that were overwhelmed (driven off scale) by the large magnitude mainshock, the four accelerometers captured a useful record of the main event and more than half an hour of the early aftershock activity.[8][14]

The June 27, 1988, shock occurred with a maximum intensity of VI (Strong). Its effects included broken windows in Los Gatos, and other light damage in Holy City, where increased flow was observed at a water well. Farther away from the Santa Cruz Mountains, pieces of concrete fell from a parking structure at the Sunnyvale Town Center, a two-level shopping mall in Santa Clara County. More moderate damage resulted from the August 8, 1989, shock (intensity VII, Very strong) when chimneys were toppled in Cupertino, Los Gatos, and Redwood Estates. Other damage included cracked walls and foundations and broken underground pipes. At the office of the Los Gatos City Manager, a window that was cracked had also been broken in the earlier shock. Also in Los Gatos, one man died when he fell or jumped through a window and impacted the ground five stories below.[1][15]

Earthquake

edit
Ground shaking animation

The Loma Prieta earthquake was named for Loma Prieta Peak in the Santa Cruz Mountains, which lies just to the east of the mainshock epicenter. The duration of the heaviest shaking in the Santa Cruz Mountains was about 15 seconds, but strong ground motion recordings revealed that the duration of shaking was not uniform throughout the affected area (because of different types and thicknesses of soil). At sites with rocky terrain, the duration was shorter and the shaking was much less intense, and at locations with unconsolidated soil (like the Marina District in San Francisco or the Cypress Street Viaduct in Oakland) the intensity of the shaking was more severe and lasted longer. The strong motion records also allowed for the causative fault to be determined – the rupture was related to the San Andreas Fault System.[9]

While a Mercalli Intensity of VIII (Severe) covered a large swath of territory relatively close to the epicenter (including the cities of Los Gatos, Santa Cruz, and Watsonville) farther to the north, portions of San Francisco were assessed at intensity IX (Violent). At more than 44 miles (70 km) distant, the San Francisco Bay Area recorded peak horizontal accelerations that were as high as 0.26 g, and close to the epicenter they peaked at more than 0.6 g. In a general way, the location of aftershocks of the event delineated the extent of the faulting, which (according to seismologist Bruce Bolt) extended about 24 miles (40 km) in length. Because the rupture took place bilaterally, the duration of strong shaking was about half of what it would have been had it ruptured in one direction only. The duration of a typical M6.9 shock with a comparable rupture length would have been about twice as long.[9]

Characteristics

edit
 
USGS ShakeMap showing the intensity of the mainshock

Gregory Beroza, a seismologist with Stanford University, made several distinctions regarding the 1906 and 1989 events. Near Loma Prieta, the 1906 rupture was more shallow, had more strike-slip, and occurred on a fault that was near vertical. The 1989 event's oblique-slip rupture was at 10 km and below on a fault plane that dipped 70° to the southwest. Because much of the slip in 1989 occurred at depth and the rupture propagated up dip, Beroza proposed that the overlying San Andreas Fault actually inhibited further rupture and also maintains that the occurrence of an event at the location that was forecast by the WGCEP in 1988 was coincidental.[16]

The contrasting characteristics of the 1906 and 1989 events were examined by seismologists Hiroo Kanamori and Kenji Satake. The significant amount of vertical displacement in 1989 was a key aspect to consider because a long-term sequence of 1989-type events (with an 80–100-year recurrence interval) normally result in regions with high topographic relief, which is not seen in the Santa Cruz Mountains. Three scenarios were presented that might explain this disparity. The first is that the geometry of the San Andreas Fault goes through a transition every several thousand years. Secondly, slip type could vary from event to event. And lastly, the 1989 event did not occur on the San Andreas Fault.[17]

Ground effects

edit

While the effects of a four-year drought limited the potential of landslides, the steep terrain near the epicenter was prone to movement, and up to 4,000 landslides may have occurred during the event. The majority of landslides occurred to the southwest of the epicenter, especially along road cuts in the Santa Cruz Mountains and in the Summit Road area, but also along the bluffs of the Pacific Coast, and as far north as the Marin Peninsula. Highway 17 was blocked for several weeks by a large slide and one person was killed by a rockfall along the coast. Other areas with certain soil conditions were susceptible to site amplification due to the effects of liquefaction, especially near the shore of San Francisco Bay (where its effects were severe in the Marina District) and to the west of the epicenter near rivers and other bodies of water. Minor lateral spreading was also seen along the shores of San Francisco Bay and to the south near Monterey Bay. Other ground effects included downslope movement, slumps, and ground cracks.[2]

Injuries and fatalities

edit
 
Collapse of the top deck of the Nimitz Freeway onto the bottom deck, and resulting crashes.

Fifty-seven of the deaths were directly caused by the earthquake; six further fatalities were ruled to have been caused indirectly.[18] In addition, there were 3,757 injuries as a result of the earthquake, 400 of which were serious.[19][20] The highest number of deaths, 42,[21] occurred in Oakland because of the collapse of the Cypress Street Viaduct on the Nimitz Freeway (Interstate 880), where the upper level of a double-deck portion of the freeway collapsed, crushing the cars on the lower level, and causing crashes on the upper level. One 50-foot (15 m) section of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge also collapsed, leading to a single fatality, Anamafi Moala, a 23-year-old woman.[22][23] Three people were killed in the collapse of buildings along the Pacific Garden Mall in Santa Cruz,[24] and five people were killed in the collapse of a brick wall on Bluxome Street in San Francisco.[25]

When the earthquake hit, the third game of the 1989 World Series baseball championship was about to begin. Because of the unusual circumstance that both of the World Series teams (the San Francisco Giants and Oakland Athletics) were based in the affected area, many people had left work early or were staying late to participate in after work group viewings and parties. As a consequence the normally crowded freeways contained unusually light traffic. If traffic had been normal for a Tuesday rush hour, injuries and deaths would certainly have been higher. The initial media reports failed to take into account the game's effect on traffic and initially estimated the death toll at 300, a number that was corrected to 63 in the days after the earthquake.[26][27]

Magnetic disturbances

edit

After the earthquake occurred, a group led by Antony C. Fraser-Smith of Stanford University reported that the event was preceded by disturbances in background magnetic field noise as measured by a sensor placed in Corralitos, about 4.5 miles (7 km) from the epicenter.[28] From October 5, they reported that a substantial increase in noise was measured in the frequency range 0.01–10 Hz.[28] The measurement instrument was a single-axis search-coil magnetometer that was being used for low frequency research.[28] Precursor increases of noise apparently started a few days before the earthquake, with noise in the range 0.01–0.5 Hz rising to exceptionally high levels about three hours before the earthquake.[28] The Fraser-Smith et al. report remains one of the most frequently cited claims of a specific earthquake precursor; more recent studies have cast doubt on the connection, attributing the Corralitos signals to either unrelated magnetic disturbance or,[29] even more simply, to sensor-system malfunction.[30]

Damage

edit
 
Five people were killed on Sixth Street between Bluxome and Townsend in San Francisco as a brick facade collapsed onto the sidewalk and street.[31]

The earthquake caused severe damage in some very specific locations in the Bay Area, most notably on unstable soil in San Francisco and Oakland. Oakland City Hall was evacuated after the earthquake until a US$80 million (equivalent to US$197 million today) seismic retrofit and hazard abatement work was completed in 1995.[32] Many other communities sustained severe damage throughout the region located in Alameda, San Mateo, Santa Clara, San Benito, Santa Cruz and Monterey counties. Major property damage in San Francisco's Marina District 60 mi (97 km) from the epicenter resulted from liquefaction of soil used to create waterfront land. Other effects included sand volcanoes, landslides and ground ruptures. Some 12,000 homes and 2,600 businesses were damaged.[19] The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) turned people who were homeless prior to the earthquake away from homeless shelters and provided shelter for those with homes prior to the earthquake.[33][34]

In Santa Cruz, close to the epicenter, 40 buildings collapsed, killing six people.[35] At the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, the Plunge Building was significantly damaged.[36] Liquefaction also caused damage in the Watsonville area.[37] For example, sand volcanoes formed in a field near Pajaro as well as in a strawberry field.[37] The Ford's department store in Watsonville experienced significant damage, including a crack down the front of the building.[37] Many homes were dislodged if they were not bolted to their foundations.[37] There were structural failures of twin bridges across Struve Slough near Watsonville.[37] In Moss Landing, the liquefaction destroyed the causeway that carried the Moss Beach access road across a tidewater basin, damaged the approach and abutment of the bridge linking Moss Landing spit to the mainland and cracked the paved road on Paul's Island.[38] In the Old Town historical district of the city of Salinas, unreinforced masonry buildings were partially destroyed.[39]

Following the quake, an estimated 1.4 million people experienced power losses that were mainly due to damaged electrical substations.[40] Many San Francisco radio and television stations were temporarily knocked off the air.[41] KGO-TV, the local ABC station in San Francisco, was off the air for about 15 minutes, while KRON-TV (at the time the region's NBC affiliate) was off the air for about half an hour,[42] and KGO-AM (ABC News Radio) was off the air for about 40 minutes.[41] About an hour and 40 minutes after the quake, Fox affiliate KTVU resumed broadcasting, with their news anchors, Dennis Richmond and Elaine Corral reporting from the station's parking lot.[43][44] KCBS-AM (CBS News Radio) switched immediately to backup power and managed to stay on air despite a subsequent generator failure.[41] KCBS later won a Peabody Award for their news coverage, as did KGO-TV.[45]

KNBR-AM (the designated station for the Bay Area's Emergency Broadcast System at the time) failed to communicate a catastrophe with the activation and instructions of the Emergency Broadcast System to the public after the quake because the engineering department at KNBR experienced major technical malfunctions and difficulties. The malfunctions during the aftermath of the earthquake caused confusion as to whether an earthquake would cause the Emergency Broadcast System to activate. KNBR began using an emergency generator, hooking up the signal from a command center right after their nearby studio was severely shaken during the quake, when most of the KNBR staff were at Candlestick for the World Series. The Mayor of San Francisco, Art Agnos, later came on the air and provided an update on the earthquake.[46]

(All four network-affiliated TV stations (KRON, KGO, KTVU and CBS affiliate KPIX) would recover enough to broadcast continuous breaking news coverage of the aftermath of the quake for the next several hours, some of it picked up and broadcast nationally over their respective networks, as well as on CNN, in a manner anticipating later major catastrophes such as the 1994 Los Angeles earthquake and the 9/11 terror attacks).

Power was restored to most of San Francisco by midnight, and all but 12,000 customers had their power restored within two days.[40]

The quake caused an estimated $6 billion[19] (equivalent to $15 billion today) in property damage, becoming one of the most expensive natural disasters in U.S. history at the time. Private donations poured into aid relief efforts and on October 26, President George H. W. Bush signed a $1.1 billion ($2.7 billion today) earthquake relief package for California.[47]

Marina District

edit
 
A building in the Marina District at Beach and Divisadero settled onto its buckled garage supports.

Four people died in San Francisco's Marina District, four buildings were destroyed by fire, and seven buildings collapsed. Another 63 damaged structures were judged too dangerous to live in.[48] Among the four deaths, one family lost their infant son who choked on dust while trapped for an hour inside their collapsed apartment.[22]

The Marina district was built on a landfill made of a mixture of sand, dirt, rubble, waste, and other materials containing a high percentage of groundwater. Some of the fill was rubble dumped into San Francisco Bay after the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, but most was sand and debris laid down in preparation for the 1915 Panama-Pacific International Exposition, a celebration of San Francisco's ability to rebound after its catastrophe in 1906.[49] After the Exposition, apartment buildings were erected on the landfill. In the 1989 earthquake, the water-saturated unconsolidated mud, sand, and rubble suffered liquefaction, and the earthquake's vertical shock waves rippled the ground more severely.[50]

At the intersection of Beach and Divisadero Streets in San Francisco, a natural gas main rupture caused a major structure fire.[51][52][53] The San Francisco Fire Department selected civilians to help run fire hoses from a distance because the nearby hydrant system failed. Since the bay was only two blocks from the burning buildings,[53] water from the bay was pumped by the fireboat Phoenix, to engines on the shore, and from there sprayed on the fire.[54][55] The apartment structures that collapsed were older buildings that included ground-floor garages, which engineers refer to as a soft story building.[56]

Santa Cruz and Monterey counties

edit
 
Santa Cruz's historic Pacific Garden Mall suffered severe damage – three died.

In Santa Cruz, the Pacific Garden Mall was severely damaged, with falling debris killing three people, half of the six earthquake deaths in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties.[35][57] Some 31 buildings were damaged enough to warrant demolition, seven of which had been listed in the Santa Cruz Historic Building Survey.[58] The four oldest were built in 1894, the five oldest withstood the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.[58]

Immediately, a number of civilians began to free victims from the rubble of Ford's Department Store and the Santa Cruz Coffee Roasting Company – both buildings had collapsed inward on customers and employees alike.[35] Two police officers crawled through voids in the debris, found one victim alive and another dead inside the coffee house.[59] Santa Cruz beach lifeguards assisted in moving the victims.[59] Police dogs were brought in to help locate other victims.[59] A woman was found dead inside Ford's.[60] The civilians who were helpful initially, were soon viewed by police and fire officials as a hindrance to operations, with frantic coworkers and friends of a coffee house employee thought to be trapped under the rubble continuing their efforts in the dark.[59] Police arrested those who refused to stop searching. This became a political issue in the following days.[61] The body of a young woman coffee worker was found under a collapsed wall late the next day.[62]

During the first few days following the quake, electric power to most Santa Cruz County subscribers was out, and some areas had no water. Limited phone service remained online, providing a crucial link to rescue workers.[61] Widespread search operations were organized to find possible victims inside the remains of fallen structures. As many as six teams of dogs and their handlers were at work identifying the large number of damaged buildings that held no victims.[61]

The quake claimed one life in Watsonville:[61] a driver who collided with panicked horses after they escaped their collapsed corral.[63] In other Santa Cruz and Monterey county locations such as Boulder Creek and Moss Landing, a number of structures were damaged, with some knocked off of their foundations.[64] Many residents slept outside their homes out of concern for further damage from aftershocks, of which there were 51 with magnitudes greater than 3.0 in the following 24 hours, and 16 more the second day.[64] The earthquake damaged several historic buildings in the Old Town district of Salinas, and some were later demolished.[65]

Damage to the Salinas River rail bridge and subsequent repairs led to reduced traffic on the Monterey Branch Line, which contributed to the discontinuance of freight rail services in western Monterey County.[66]

San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge

edit
 
Collapsed upper deck section of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge – one person died.

The San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge suffered severe damage, as a 76-by-50-foot (23 m × 15 m) section of the upper deck on the eastern cantilever side fell onto the deck below. The quake caused the Oakland side of the bridge to shift 7 in (18 cm) to the east, and caused the bolts of one section to shear off, sending the 250-short-ton (230 t; 500,000 lb; 226,800 kg) section of roadbed crashing down like a trapdoor.[67] Traffic on both decks came to a halt, blocked by the section of the roadbed. Police began unsnarling the traffic jam, telling drivers to turn their cars around and drive back the way they had come. Eastbound drivers stuck on the lower deck between the collapse and Yerba Buena Island were routed up to the upper deck and westward back to San Francisco. A miscommunication made by emergency workers at Yerba Buena Island routed some drivers the wrong way; they were directed to the upper deck where they drove eastward toward the collapse site.[22] One of these drivers did not see the open gap in time; the 1980 Mercury Zephyr plunged over the edge and smashed onto the collapsed roadbed. The driver, Anamafi Moala, died, and the passenger, her brother, was seriously injured.[23][51][68] Caltrans removed and replaced the collapsed section, and re-opened the bridge on November 18.[50]

To assist with transportation during Bay Bridge repairs, Bay Area Rapid Transit ran 24-hour service in the Transbay Tube between the date of the earthquake and December 3 that same year.[50]

Oakland and Interstate 880/Cypress Viaduct

edit

The worst disaster of the earthquake was the collapse of the double-deck Cypress Street Viaduct of Interstate 880 in West Oakland. The failure of a 1.25-mile (2.0 km) section[69] of the viaduct, also known as the "Cypress Structure" and the "Cypress Freeway",[22] killed 42 and injured many more.[70]

Built in the late 1950s and opened to traffic in 1957 (as SR 17), the Cypress Street Viaduct, a stretch of Interstate 880, was a double-deck freeway section made of nonductile reinforced concrete[71] that was constructed above and astride Cypress Street in Oakland. Roughly half of the land the Cypress Viaduct was built on was filled marshland and the other half somewhat more stable alluvium.[72] Because of new highway structure design guidelines – the requirement of ductile construction elements – instituted following the 1971 San Fernando earthquake, a limited degree of earthquake reinforcement was retrofitted to the Cypress Viaduct in 1977. The added elements were longitudinal restraints at transverse expansion joints in the box girder spans, but no studies were made of possible failure modes specific to the Cypress Viaduct. Caltrans has since received widespread backlash for not thoroughly studying the structure.[71] When the earthquake hit, the shaking was amplified on the former marshland, and soil liquefaction occurred.[64]

The Cypress Street Viaduct's collapsed upper deck and failed support columns – 42 people died

When the earthquake struck, the freeway buckled and twisted before the support columns failed and the upper deck fell on the lower deck. Forty-two people were crushed to death in their cars. Cars on the upper deck were tossed around violently, some of them flipped sideways, and some were left dangling at the edge of the freeway. Nearby residents and factory workers came to the rescue, climbing onto the wreckage with ladders and forklifts[31] and pulling trapped people out of their cars from under a four-foot gap in some sections. 60 members of Oakland's Public Works Agency left the nearby city yard and joined rescue efforts.[69] Employees from Pacific Pipe drove heavy lift equipment to the scene and started using it to raise sections of fallen freeway enough to allow further rescue. Local workers continued their volunteer operation nonstop until October 21, 1989, when they were forced to pause as U.S. President George H. W. Bush and California Governor George Deukmejian viewed the damage.[73] That same day, survivor Buck Helm was freed from the wreckage, having spent 90 hours trapped in his car.[74] Dubbed "Lucky Buck" by the local radio, Helm lived for another 29 days on life support, but then died of respiratory failure at the age of 58.[75]

Although the freeway reopened in stages between 1997 and 1999, it was not fully rebuilt until 2001 so that it would comply with safety and reinforcement standards.[76] In the meantime, traffic was detoured through nearby Interstate 980, causing increased congestion.[76] Instead of rebuilding Interstate 880 over the same ground, Caltrans rerouted the freeway farther west around the outskirts of West Oakland to provide better access to the Port of Oakland and the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, and to meet community desires to keep the freeway from cutting through residential areas (at the time the original viaduct was constructed, West Oakland was predominantly occupied by African- and Hispanic-Americans). Street-level Mandela Parkway now occupies the previous roadbed of the Cypress structure.[77]

Effects on transportation

edit
Aftershocks
Mag Date (UTC) Year
4.3 ML Oct 18 at 00:38 1989
5.2 ML Oct 18 at 00:41 1989
4.0 ML Oct 18 at 02:26 1989
4.1 ML Oct 18 at 03:30 1989
4.2 ML Oct 18 at 04:50 1989
4.2 ML Oct 18 at 05:18 1989
4.3 ML Oct 18 at 10:22 1989
4.3 ML Oct 19 at 9:53 1989
4.2 ML Oct 21 at 10:22 1989
4.7 ML Oct 21 at 22:14 1989
4.3 ML Nov 2 at 05:50 1989
4.3 ML Apr 18 at 13:37 1990
4.5 ML Apr 18 at 13:41 1990
5.4 ML Apr 18 at 13:53 1990
4.2 ML Apr 18 at 14:52 1990
4.2 ML Apr 18 at 15:28 1990
4.5 ML Mar 24 at 03:42 1991
Dietz & Ellsworth 1997, p. 43

Immediately after the earthquake, Bay Area airports were closed so officials could conduct a visual inspection and damage assessment procedures. San Jose International Airport,[78] Oakland International Airport and San Francisco International Airport all opened the next morning.[79] Large cracks in Oakland's runway and taxiway reduced the usable length to two-thirds normal, and damage to the dike required quick remediation to avoid flooding the runway with water from the bay. Oakland Airport repair costs were assessed at $30 million (equivalent to $77 million today).[80]

San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni) lost all power to electric transit systems when the quake hit, but otherwise suffered little damage and no injuries to operators or riders.[81] Cable cars and electric trains and buses were stalled in place – half of Muni's transport capability was lost for 12 hours. Muni relied on diesel buses to continue abbreviated service until electric power was restored later that night, and electric units could be inspected and readied for service on the morning of October 18.[81] After 78 hours, 96 percent of Muni services were back in operation, including the cable cars.[81] Amtrak intercity rail service into Oakland from the California Zephyr continued, but the Coast Starlight was temporarily suspended north of Salinas because of damage to the Southern Pacific's Coast Line.[82]

The earthquake changed the Bay Area's automobile transportation landscape. Not only did the quake force seismic retrofitting of all Bay Area bridges,[83] it caused enough damage that some parts of the region's freeway system had to be demolished.[84] Damage to the region's transportation system was estimated at $1.8 billion (equivalent to $4.4 billion today).[64]

  • San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, Interstate 80: The Bay Bridge was repaired and reopened to traffic in a month. However, the earthquake made it clear that the Bay Bridge, like many of California's toll bridges, required major repair or replacement for long-term viability and safety. Construction on a replacement for the eastern span began on January 29, 2002. The project was completed on September 2, 2013.[85]
  • Cypress Street Viaduct/Nimitz Freeway, Interstate 880: The 1.78-mile (2.86 km) double-decked Cypress Street Viaduct, Interstate 880 was demolished soon after the earthquake and was not replaced until July 1997 (To the Bay Bridge only, the ramps to and from Interstate 80 east were not completed until 2001 despite opening in 1999). The replacement freeway section is a single-deck rather than double-deck structure and was re-routed around the outskirts of West Oakland, rather than bisecting it as the Cypress Street Viaduct had done. The former route of the Cypress Street Viaduct was reopened as the ground-level Mandela Parkway.[86]
  • Embarcadero Freeway, State Route 480: Earthquake damage forced the closure and demolition of San Francisco's incomplete and controversial Embarcadero Freeway (State Route 480). This removal opened up San Francisco's Embarcadero area to new development. The elevated structure, which ran along San Francisco's waterfront, was demolished in 1991 and later replaced with a ground-level boulevard.
  • Interstate 280: Seismic damage also forced the long-term closure of Interstate 280 in San Francisco (north of US 101), another concrete freeway which had never been completed to its originally planned route. The uncompleted northernmost stub of I-280 was demolished during August–October 1995[87] while one connecting ramp between northbound I-280 and southbound US 101 was opened in December 1995.[88] The full I-280 project was completed in late 1997.[89] In addition, another segment of Interstate 280 in Los Altos near State Route 85 also suffered seismic damage and was subsequently repaired.[90]
  • Central Freeway, U.S. Highway 101: San Francisco's Central Freeway (part of US 101 and a key link to the Bay Bridge flyover) was another concrete double-deck structure that faced demolition because of safety concerns. Originally terminating at Franklin Street and Golden Gate Avenue near San Francisco's Civic Center, the section past Fell Street was demolished first, then later the section between Mission and Fell Streets. The section from Mission Street to Market Street was rebuilt (completed September 2005) as a single-deck elevated freeway, touching down at Market Street and feeding into Octavia Boulevard, a ground-level urban parkway carrying traffic to and from the major San Francisco traffic arterials that the old elevated freeway used to connect to directly, including Fell and Oak Streets (which serve the city's western neighborhoods) and Franklin and Gough Streets (which serve northern neighborhoods and the Golden Gate Bridge).
State Route 1 collapsed near Watsonville with Loma Prieta Peak visible in background (left) and landslide debris blocking both eastbound lanes of Highway 17 near Summit Road
  • State Route 17: Over half of the 26-mile (42 km) highway was closed for about one to two months because of landslides that occurred between Granite Creek Road in Scotts Valley and State Route 9 in Los Gatos (only Buses and carpoolers with three or more people could cross it). After reopening, retaining walls and barbed fences were added in damaged areas to prevent any further landslides/rockslides. The route crosses the San Andreas Fault in the Santa Cruz Mountains, near the earthquake's epicenter.
  • Cabrillo Highway, State Route 1: In Watsonville, the Struve Slough Bridge collapsed, with concrete/steel support columns penetrating up through the bridge deck. The highway was closed for several months until it could be demolished and rebuilt (commuters took SR 152 and SR 129 as bypass routes). Another section of Highway 1 through Monterey suffered damage and had to be rebuilt as well. Additionally, the bridge carrying Highway 1 over the Salinas River near Highway 156 and Fort Ord was damaged and subsequently rebuilt.
  • Bay Area Rapid Transit: The BART rail system, which hauled commuters between the East Bay and San Francisco via the Transbay Tube, was virtually undamaged and only closed for post-earthquake inspection. With the Bay Bridge closed because of its damage, the Transbay Tube became the quickest way into San Francisco via Oakland for a month, and ridership increased in the three work weeks following the earthquake, going from 218,000 riders per average weekday to more than 330,000 post-quake, a 50% increase.[50] BART instituted round-the-clock train service until December 3 when they returned to their normal schedule.[50] In 2006, BART began the $1.3 billion Earthquake Safety Program to retrofit tunnels, aerial structures, and stations. Completion is planned by 2023.[91]
  • Amtrak: Historic 16th Street Station in downtown Oakland suffered significant damage and was rendered structurally unsound. Amtrak would shift its Oakland operations to a new station in Emeryville.[92]
  • Transbay Ferries: Ferry service between San Francisco and Oakland, which had ended decades before, was revived during the month-long closure of the Bay Bridge as an alternative to the overcrowded BART. A ferry terminal was put together in Alameda, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dredged a suitable ferry dock at the Berkeley Marina.[93] Additionally, the demolition of the quake-damaged Embarcadero Freeway led to the Ferry Building Terminal renovation, increasing the efficiency of ferry service to the peninsula. The passenger-only service proved popular and continues to expand its service. The need for a robust ferry system in the event that the region's roads and tunnels become impassable in an emergency led to the creation of the San Francisco Bay Ferry system.[94]

1989 World Series and television coverage

edit

The 1989 World Series featured the Oakland Athletics and the San Francisco Giants in the first cross-town World Series since 1956. Game 3 of the series was scheduled to begin at San Francisco's Candlestick Park on October 17 at 5:35 PDT, and American television network ABC began its pre-game show at 5:00 PDT. When the earthquake struck at approximately 5:04 PDT, sportscaster Tim McCarver was narrating taped highlights of Game 2, which had been played two days prior across the Bay Bridge in Oakland. Television viewers saw the video signal begin to break up, heard McCarver repeat a sentence as the shaking distracted him, and heard McCarver's colleague Al Michaels exclaim, "I'll tell you what, we're having an earth – ."[63] At that moment, the signal from Candlestick Park was lost.[95]

The network put up a green ABC Sports "World Series" technical difficulties telop graphic while it scrambled to repair the video feed (the broadcast cameras and mics were powered by the local power supply), but audio from the stadium was restored after thirteen seconds via a telephone link:

Al Michaels: Well, heh, I don't know if we're on the air... We are in commercial, I guess.

Jim Palmer: Yes, yes, we hear you.

Tim McCarver: I guess...

Michaels: I don't hear a thing.

McCarver: I guess Dave Parker...

Michaels: Well, heh, I don't know if we're on the air or not, and I'm not sure I care at this particular moment but we are. Well, folks, that's the greatest open in the history of television! Bar none!

McCarver: Opened with a bang!

Michaels: Yes, it certainly did! Heh! We're still here! Heh! We are still, as we can tell, on the air, and I guess you are hearing us, even though we have no picture and no return audio, and we will be back, we hope, from San Francisco, in just a moment.[96]

The combined screams of excitement and panic from fans who had no idea of the devastation elsewhere could be heard in the background.[97] ABC then switched to episodes of Roseanne and The Wonder Years, which were on standby for a rain delay situation, while attempting to restore electricity to its remote equipment. The first television news report of the earthquake, filed by reporter Mark Coogan, came over KABC-TV in Los Angeles at 5:11 pm PDT.[98] KGO-TV, the local owned-and-operated ABC station in San Francisco, lost power for almost 15 minutes upon the start of the earthquake, before beginning its coverage with anchor Cheryl Jennings.[99]

With anchorman Ted Koppel in position in Washington, D.C., ABC News began continuous coverage of the quake at 5:32 pm PDT, with Al Michaels, in the process, becoming a de facto on-site reporter for ABC. CBS News also began coverage around that same time with coverage from its San Francisco affiliate KPIX-TV.[42] About an hour later, NBC News also began continuous coverage with Tom Brokaw[100] anchoring and featuring local coverage from its then-San Francisco affiliate, KRON-TV.[42] A Goodyear Blimp had already been overhead to cover the baseball game, and ABC used it to capture images of damage to the Bay Bridge and other locations.[41] Local Fox affiliate KTVU was knocked off the air for over 90 minutes before returning to the air with a raw feed fed from one of the station's remote trucks. KTVU anchors Dennis Richmond and Elaine Corral began their coverage from the station's parking lot, as power had not yet been restored to that section of Oakland.[101]

 
One person died when a five-story tower collapsed at St. Joseph's Seminary in Santa Clara County.

Inside Candlestick Park, fewer than half of the more than 62,000 fans[22] had reached their seats by the time of the quake, and the load on the structure of the stadium was lower than maximum.[102] There had also been a seismic-strengthening project previously completed on the upper deck concrete windscreen that may have prevented large numbers of injuries in the event of serious damage or even a catastrophic collapse.[103] Fans reported that the stadium moved in an articulated manner as the earthquake wave passed through it, that the light standards swayed by many feet, and that the concrete upper deck windscreen moved in a wave-like manner over a distance of several feet. When electrical power to the stadium was lost, someone drove a police car onto the field, where an officer used the car's public address system to advise that the game had been postponed. After the shaking subsided, many of the players on both teams immediately searched for, and gathered, family and friends from the stands before evacuating the facility.[102]

The October 18, 1989, edition of NBC's Today that covered the earthquake ran until noon Eastern Time. Bryant Gumbel, Jane Pauley and Deborah Norville anchored from Chicago (where they had planned to originally do a special celebratory edition), with reports done by Bob Jamieson and Don Oliver in San Francisco, and George Lewis in Oakland. Jim Miklaszewski and Bob Hager covered disaster response from Washington. NBC Sports commentators Bob Costas and Jimmy Cefalo discussed the effect the temblor would have on the 1989 World Series.

The World Series was delayed while the Bay Area started the recovery process. While the teams' stadiums had suffered only minor damage, it took several days for power and transmission links at Candlestick Park to be repaired. After ten days (the longest delay in World Series history), Game 3 was held in San Francisco on October 27 and Game 4 the following afternoon as the Athletics swept the Giants, four games to none.[102]

It is likely that the World Series game saved many lives, as Bay Area residents who would have normally been on the freeways were at home ready to watch the game when the earthquake hit. It is a rough estimate that thousands of people may have otherwise been on the Cypress Structure during the 5:00 pm rush-hour, as the structure was said to have carried 195,000 vehicles a day.[104]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d e f g Stover, C. W.; Coffman, J. L. (1993), Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (Revised), U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527, United States Government Printing Office, pp. 98, 99, 180–186
  2. ^ a b c d Clough, G. W.; Martin, II, J. R.; Chameau, J. L. (1994), "The geotechnical aspects", Practical lessons from the Loma Prieta earthquake, National Academies Press, pp. 29–46, ISBN 978-0309050302
  3. ^ International Seismological Centre. ISC-EHB Bulletin. Thatcham, United Kingdom. [Event 389808].
  4. ^ ISC-EHB Event 389808 [IRIS].
  5. ^ Housner 1990, pp. 19–23
  6. ^ Ma, K.; Satake, K.; Kanamori, H. (1991), "The origin of the tsunami excited by the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake – Faulting or slumping" (PDF), Geophysical Research Letters, 18 (4): 637–640, Bibcode:1991GeoRL..18..637M, doi:10.1029/91gl00818, archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2010, retrieved August 10, 2014
  7. ^ Breaker, L. C.; Murty, T. S.; Norton, J. G.; Carrol, D. (2009), "Comparing sea level response at Monterey, California from the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake and the 1964 Great Alaskan earthquake" (PDF), Science of Tsunami Hazards, 28 (5), Tsunami Society: 255–271
  8. ^ a b c d Perfettini, H.; Stein, R. S.; Simpson, R.; Cocco, M. (1999), "Stress transfer by the 1988–1989 M = 5.3 and 5.4 Lake Elsman foreshocks to the Loma Prieta fault: Unclamping at the site of peak mainshock slip", Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104 (B9): 20, 169, 20, 173, 20, 174, Bibcode:1999JGR...10420169P, doi:10.1029/1999JB950092
  9. ^ a b c Bolt, B. (2005), Earthquakes: 2006 Centennial Update – The 1906 Big One (Fifth ed.), W. H. Freeman and Company, pp. 10–14, 293–297, ISBN 978-0716775485
  10. ^ ANSS: Loma Prieta 1989, Origin (accessed 2019-04-01).
  11. ^ Ma, Kuo-Fong; Satake, Kenji; Kanamori, Hiroo (1991). "The origin of the tsunami excited by the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake  – Faulting or slumping?". Geophysical Research Letters. 18 (4): 637–640. Bibcode:1991GeoRL..18..637M. doi:10.1029/91GL00818. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  12. ^ Yeats, R. (2012), Active Faults of the World, Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–83, 89–92, ISBN 978-0521190855
  13. ^ a b Harris, R. A. (1998), "Forecasts of the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88 (4), Seismological Society of America: 898, 900, 904, 905, 908–911, Bibcode:1998BuSSA..88..898H, doi:10.1785/BSSA0880040898, S2CID 132778333
  14. ^ McNally, K. C.; Similia, G. W.; Brown, J. G. (1996), "Main-shock and very early aftershock activity", The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Main Shock Characteristics, USGS Professional Paper 1550-A, Earthquake Occurrence, United States Government Printing Office, pp. 147–150
  15. ^ Times Wire Services (August 8, 1989). "1 Dead as 5.1 Quake Jolts Bay Area : Man, 19, Leaps to Death in Panic; Damage Minor". Los Angeles Times.
  16. ^ Beroza, G. (1991), "Near-source modeling of the Loma Prieta earthquake: Evidence for heterogeneous slip and implications for earthquake hazard", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 81 (5), Seismological Society of America: 1603, 1604, 1609, 1616
  17. ^ Kanamori, H.; Satake, K. (1996), "Broadband study of the source characteristics of the earthquake", The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Main Shock Characteristics, USGS Professional Paper 1550-A, Earthquake Occurrence, United States Government Printing Office, pp. A75, A79
  18. ^ Eberhart-Phillips JE; Saunders TM; Robinson AL; Hatch DL; Parrish RG (June 1994). "Profile of mortality from the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake using coroner and medical examiner reports". Disasters. 18 (2): 160–170. Bibcode:1994Disas..18..160E. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1994.tb00298.x. PMID 8076160.
  19. ^ a b c USGS. San Andreas Fault, chapter 1, p. 5. "Comparison of the Bay Area Earthquakes: 1906 and 1989." Retrieved August 31, 2009.
  20. ^ Palm, 1992, p. 63.
  21. ^ Windmiller, Joel. "Cypress Viaduct Freeway". Archived from the original on July 7, 2009. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  22. ^ a b c d e Fagan, Kevin (October 12, 1999). "Out of the Rubble. Ten Years After: First in a week-long retrospective of the Loma Prieta quake". San Francisco Chronicle.
  23. ^ a b Hager, Philip (May 1, 1991). "Claim Settled in the Only Quake Death, Injury on Bay Bridge". Los Angeles Times.
  24. ^ Rosato, Joe Jr. (October 17, 2014). "25 Years Since Loma Prieta: Santa Cruz Journalist Has Photographic Memories of 1989 Quake". NBC Bay Area.
  25. ^ "89 quake: Wake-up call for Bay Area buildings". ABC 7 (KGO-TV). October 16, 2009.
  26. ^ "1989: Earthquake hits San Francisco". BBC News. October 17, 1989. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  27. ^ Dan Rather (October 18, 1989). CBS Evening News (Television broadcast). Event occurs at 0:18. Retrieved February 26, 2013. The deadliest earthquake in the United States in more than 80 years kills close to 300 people...
  28. ^ a b c d Fraser-Smith, Antony C.; Bernardi, A.; McGill, P. R.; Ladd, M. E.; Helliwell, R. A.; Villard, Jr., O. G. (August 1990). "Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Measurements Near the Epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta Earthquake" (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters. 17 (9): 1465–1468. Bibcode:1990GeoRL..17.1465F. doi:10.1029/GL017i009p01465. ISSN 0094-8276. OCLC 1795290. Retrieved December 18, 2010.
  29. ^ Campbell, W. H. (2009). "Natural magnetic disturbance fields, not precursors, preceding the Loma Prieta earthquake". Journal of Geophysical Research. 114 (A5): A05307. Bibcode:2009JGRA..114.5307C. doi:10.1029/2008JA013932.
  30. ^ Thomas, J. N.; Love, J. J.; Johnston, M. J. S. (April 2009). "On the reported magnetic precursor of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 173 (3–4): 207–215. Bibcode:2009PEPI..173..207T. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2008.11.014.
  31. ^ a b "Earthquake". Time. Monday, October 30, 1989. Ed Magnuson. p. 5. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  32. ^ "Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. Oakland City Hall". Archived from the original on July 30, 2014. Retrieved July 29, 2014.
  33. ^ Mathews, Jay (October 27, 1989). "Earthquake Swells Ranks of Homeless". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved November 29, 2020.
  34. ^ Williams, Patricia J. (1991). The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 26. ISBN 0674014707. OCLC 22512286.
  35. ^ a b c Gathright, Alan (October 16, 2004). "Loma Prieta Earthquake: 15 years later. Shaken – and then stirred. Santa Cruz capitalized on fate, working together to rebuild downtown after quake". San Francisco Chronicle.
  36. ^ "Press – Boardwalk History". Beachboardwalk.com. Archived from the original on November 5, 2011. Retrieved December 31, 2011.
  37. ^ a b c d e "Watsonville Area". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved December 31, 2011.
  38. ^ "Moss Landing". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved December 31, 2011.
  39. ^ "Salinas". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved December 31, 2011.
  40. ^ a b Eguchi, R. T.; Seligson, H. A. (1994), "Lifeline perspectives", Practical lessons from the Loma Prieta earthquake, National Academies Press, p. 142, ISBN 978-0309050302
  41. ^ a b c d Rapaport, Richard J. (1998). The Media: Radio, Television, and Newspapers. The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Lifelines: Performance of the Built Environment. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. pp. A43–A46. ISBN 978-0607915518. Retrieved February 28, 2013.
  42. ^ a b c Gerard, Jeremy. The New York Times, October 24, 1989. "The California Quake; NBC News Tells of Errors and Obstacles to Early Coverage of Quake". Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  43. ^ "Bay Area Television News Prepares For End Of An Era". May 12, 2008. Archived from the original on December 11, 2013. Retrieved March 1, 2013.
  44. ^ "KTVU comes back on-air after 1989 earthquake". July 31, 2011 – via YouTube.
  45. ^ San Francisco Earthquake History 1990–1994. Archived November 5, 2012, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  46. ^ Katayama, Tsuneo (March 1992). "KNBR's response on Loma Prieta's Emergency Broadcast System activation failure" (PDF). How Radio Responded to the Disaster. Retrieved April 9, 2021.
  47. ^ Pub. L. 101–130
  48. ^ Fradkin, 1999, p. 188.
  49. ^ Fradkin, 1999, pp. 138, 193–194.
  50. ^ a b c d e San Francisco Earthquake History 1915–1989. Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  51. ^ a b An Oral History of the Presidio of San Francisco During the Loma Prieta Earthquake Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  52. ^ "Earthquake". Time. Monday, October 30, 1989. Ed Magnuson. p. 1. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  53. ^ a b Scawthorn; Eidinger; Schiff, eds. (2005). Fire Following Earthquake. Reston, VA: ASCE, NFPA. ISBN 978-0784407394. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 17, 2015.
  54. ^ Guardians of the City. Fire Department. "SFFD Fireboats: The History of the Fireboat Phoenix." Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  55. ^ "Fireboats: Then and Now". FEMA. Technical Report Series. Special Report. USFA-TR-146/May 2003. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  56. ^ "Putting Down Roots in Earthquake Country". Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  57. ^ "The California Quake; Earthquake Casualties". The New York Times. Associated Press. October 24, 1989. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 27, 2023.
  58. ^ a b "Buildings Demolished in Downtown Santa Cruz as a result of the Loma Prieta Earthquake, 1989" Archived June 25, 2010, at the Wayback Machine. Santa Cruz Public Libraries. Local History. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  59. ^ a b c d Santa Cruz Public Libraries. Local History. Log of Emergency Response Operations. Tuesday, October 17, 5:04 pm, 15-second earthquake! Archived June 25, 2010, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  60. ^ Santa Cruz Public Libraries. Local History. Photograph Collection: rs009. The front of Ford's Department Store on the corner of Pacific Avenue and Cathcart Street. A woman inside the store died from falling debris during the earthquake. Ford's was later razed. Date: October 18, 1989. Courtesy of Ray Sherrod. Archived August 12, 2014, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  61. ^ a b c d sfmuseum.org. Edward J. Phipps. Overview of Fire Service Responses near the Epicenter of the Loma Prieta Earthquake Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  62. ^ "Earthquake". Time. Monday, October 30, 1989. Ed Magnuson. p. 6. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  63. ^ a b "Earthquake". Time. Monday, October 30, 1989. Ed Magnuson. p. 2. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  64. ^ a b c d USGS. Historic Earthquakes. Santa Cruz Mountains (Loma Prieta), California. Archived September 22, 2008, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved September 6, 2009.
  65. ^ Cheevers, Jack (October 25, 1989). "Bay Area Quake – Landmarks Totter – Preservationists Fear Quake-Damaged Historic Buildings Will Be Torn Down". Los Angeles Times.
  66. ^ Schwieterman, Joseph P. (2004). When The Railroad Leaves Town. Kirksville, Missouri: Truman State University Press. p. 59. ISBN 1931112142.
  67. ^ "The California Quake: The Bay Bridge; Damage to Link Across Bay Is More Serious Than Thought". The New York Times. October 20, 1989.
  68. ^ Viets, Jack (October 27, 1989). "They Drove into Gap: Survivor Recalls Death of Sister on Bay Bridge". San Francisco Chronicle. The Chronicle Publishing Co. p. A21.
  69. ^ a b Fowler, Dave. The Initial Response to the Cypress Freeway Disaster. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  70. ^ Fagan, Kevin (October 12, 1999). "On the Cypress Freeway, Strangers Joined Together for a Snap in Time". San Francisco Chronicle.
  71. ^ a b Housner 1990, pp. 3–5
  72. ^ EERI, November 1989. Loma Prieta Earthquake, October 17, 1989. Preliminary Reconnaissance Report. Retrieved September 6, 2009.
  73. ^ "People Moving Gingerly As They Pick Up Pieces". The New York Times. October 21, 1989. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  74. ^ "Survivor Pulled From Cypress Carnage, Miracle in the Ruins: Buck Helm is 'Tough as Nails.'". San Francisco Examiner. October 22, 1989. p. A1.
  75. ^ "Man Who Lived 90 Hours in Quake Rubble Is Dead". The New York Times. Associated Press. November 20, 1989.
  76. ^ a b Caltrans. 1998 Highway Congestion Monitoring Report. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
  77. ^ Berthelsen, G. (November–December 2002), "Mandela Parkway: Building Pride in West Oakland" (PDF), California Transportation Journal, 3 (3), California Department of Transportation: 2–7
  78. ^ "Earthquake". Time. Monday, October 30, 1989. Ed Magnuson. p. 7. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  79. ^ Roderick, Kevin (October 19, 1989). "Search For Bodies to Take Days – State Puts Toll at 273, Then Says It Is Uncertain". Los Angeles Times.
  80. ^ McDonnell 1993, p. 58
  81. ^ a b c Stead, William G., Muni Railway Manager. "Municipal Railway Earthquake Notebook Tuesday, October 17, 1989, 5:04 PM", December 15, 1989, letter to Art Agnos, mayor. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  82. ^ Egelko, Bob (October 18, 1989). "Earthquake leaves behind urban travel nightmares". Nashua Telegraph.
  83. ^ Golden Gate Bridge. Overview of Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit. Updated February 2009. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
    Caltrans. Richmond – San Rafael Bridge. Retrofit Project. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
    Caltrans. Bay Area Toll Bridges. Benicia–Martinez Bridge Seismic Retrofit. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
    Caltrans. Bay Area Toll Bridges. Carquinez Bridge Seismic Retrofit. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
    Caltrans. Bay Area Toll Bridges. San Francisco – Oakland Bay Bridge Retrofit. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
    Caltrans. Bay Area Toll Bridges. San Mateo – Hayward seismic retrofit. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
    Caltrans. Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee. Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Report, September 30, 2008. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
  84. ^ Housner 1990, p. 62
  85. ^ San Francisco-Oakland bay bridge opens to traffic after years of delays | World news. The Guardian. September 3, 2013.
  86. ^ "FHWA By Day: February 27". Federal Highway Administration. February 27, 1991. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
  87. ^ SFGate.com. Demolition Of I-280 Stub Starts Saturday: China Basin area work to last for 2 months. August 8, 1995. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
  88. ^ SFGate.com. Interchange Between Highway 280, 101 Reopens. December 4, 1995. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
  89. ^ SFGate.com. Major Bay Area Highway Projects. February 23, 1997. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
  90. ^ "Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake October 17, 1989. Los Alt... (1) – Photo Gallery 4". luirig.altervista.org. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
  91. ^ "Earthquake Safety Program". Bay Area Rapid Transit. Retrieved May 8, 2024.
  92. ^ National Association of Railroad Passengers (August 19, 1994). "Hotline #839". Archived from the original on October 4, 2013. Retrieved July 31, 2012.
  93. ^ McDonnell 1993, pp. 47, 48
  94. ^ Cabanatuan, Michael (April 13, 2006). "Bay Area / Revived push for water-transit network / Emergency system seen as necessary after a big quake". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved January 9, 2016.
  95. ^ News report on MLB.COM, 1:50 minutes in. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  96. ^ ABC 1989 World Series Game 3 Earthquake – YouTube
  97. ^ "Earthquake". Time. Monday, October 30, 1989. Ed Magnuson. p. 3. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  98. ^ "Loma Prieta Earthquake, October 17, 1989". June 18, 2021 – via YouTube.
  99. ^ 10-17-1989 San Francisco Earthquake – First Minutes (KGO TV) – YouTube
  100. ^ "Earthquake Readiness: How the San Franciso [sic] 1989 Quake Shook Awareness". Retro Reporter. April 14, 2014.
  101. ^ KTVU comes back on-air after 1989 earthquake, YouTube.
  102. ^ a b c Hinshaw, Horace. Pacifica Tribune, June 17, 2009. "Remembering World Series Earthquake." Hosted by MercuryNews.com. Retrieved August 30, 2009.
  103. ^ Lipman-Blumen, Jean. (2006) The Allure of Toxic Leaders: Why We Follow Destructive Bosses and Corrupt Politicians – and How We Can Survive Them, p. 107. Sourcebooks, Inc. ISBN 0195312007
  104. ^ Schwartz, Bob (October 20, 1989). "The Bay Area Quake : Pressure Points : What Worked, What Didn't, What Didn't, And Why : Nimitz Freeway : Collapse of Deck Puts Spotlight on Aging Roads". Los Angeles Times.

Sources

Further reading

edit
  • Fuis, G. S.; Catchings, R. D.; Scheirer, D. S.; Bauer, K.; Goldman, M.; Earney, T. E.; Lin, G.; Zhang, E. (2022), "New Insights on Subsurface Geology and the San Andreas Fault at Loma Prieta, Central California", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 112 (6): 3121–3140, Bibcode:2022BuSSA.112.3121F, doi:10.1785/0120220037, ISSN 0037-1106, S2CID 252139737
edit