Wikipedia

Fan fiction

(Redirected from Fan fictions)
For other uses, see Fan Fiction.
"Fanfic" redirects here. For the film, see Fanfic (film).

Fan fiction or fanfiction, also known as fan fic, fanfic, fic or FF, is fiction written in an amateur capacity by fans as a form of fan labor, unauthorized by, but based on, an existing work of fiction. The author uses copyrighted characters, settings, or other intellectual properties from the original creator(s) as a basis for their writing and can retain the original characters and settings, add their own, or both. Fan fiction ranges in length from a few sentences to novel-length and can be based on fictional and non-fictional media, including novels, movies, comics, television shows, musical groups, cartoons, anime and manga, and video games.

New Adventures of Alice (1917) by John Rae, an early pastiche or fan fiction

Fan fiction is rarely commissioned or authorized by the original work's creator or publisher or professionally published. It may infringe on the original author's copyright, depending on the jurisdiction and on legal questions, such as whether or not it qualifies as "fair use" (see Legal issues with fan fiction). The attitudes of authors and copyright owners of original works towards fan fiction have ranged from encouragement to indifference or disapproval, and have occasionally responded with legal action.

The term came into use in the 20th century as copyright laws began to distinguish between stories using established characters that were authorized by the copyright holder and those that were not.[1]

Fan fiction is defined by being related to its subject's canonical fictional universe, either staying within those boundaries but not being part of the canon, or being set in an alternative universe.[2] Thus, what is considered "fanon" is separate from canon. Fan fiction is often written and published among fans, and as such does not usually cater to readers without knowledge of the original media.

Definition

edit

The term fan fiction has been used in print as early as 1938; in the earliest known citations, it refers to amateur-written science fiction, as opposed to "pro fiction".[3][4] The term also appears in the 1944 Fancyclopedia, an encyclopaedia of fandom jargon, in which it is defined as "fiction about fans, or sometimes about pros, and occasionally bringing in some famous characters from [science fiction] stories". It also mentions that the term is "sometimes improperly used to mean fan science fiction; that is, ordinary fantasy published in a fan magazine".[4][5]

History

edit
edit
See also: History of copyright law

Before the adoption of copyright in the modern sense, it was common for authors to copy characters or plots from other works. For instance, Shakespeare's plays Romeo and Juliet, Much Ado About Nothing, Othello, As You Like It and The Winter's Tale were based on recent works by other authors of the time.[6]

In 1614, Alonso Fernández de Avellaneda wrote a sequel to Cervantes' Don Quixote before he had finished and published his own second volume.

19th century

edit
Further information: Pastiche and Unofficial sequel

Among 19th-century literature that has been subject to depictions not authorized by the original author include Bram Stoker's Dracula's depiction in the translated adaptation Powers of Darkness.[7] The works of Jane Austen remain among the most popular works for unauthorized adaptations,[8] with a notable example of Jane Austen fan fiction being Old Friends and New Fancies. Many unauthorized stories of Sherlock Holmes by Arthur Conan Doyle have been created, including The Adventure of the Two Collaborators by J. M. Barrie.[9] Other notable works include The Space Machine and Morlock Night, respectively based on The War of the Worlds and The Time Machine by H. G. Wells; A New Alice in the Old Wonderland, based on Alice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll; and Wide Sargasso Sea, based on Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte.[10]

Star Trek fandom

edit
 
The Star Trek fanzine Spockanalia contained the first fan fiction in the modern sense of the term.

The modern phenomenon of fan fiction as an expression of fandom and fan interaction was popularized and defined by the Star Trek fandom and its fanzines, which were published in the 1960s. The first Star Trek fanzine, Spockanalia (1967), contained some fan fiction; many others followed its example.[11]: 1  These fanzines were produced using offset printing and mimeography and mailed to other fans or sold at science fiction conventions for a small fee to cover the cost of production. Unlike other aspects of fandom, women were the primary authors of fan fiction; 83% of Star Trek fan fiction authors were female by 1970, and 90% by 1973.[12] One scholar states that fan fiction "fill[s] the need of a mostly female audience for fictional narratives that expand the boundary of the official source products offered on the television and movie screen."[13]

World Wide Web

edit

Fan fiction has become more popular and widespread since the advent of the World Wide Web. According to one estimate, fan fiction comprises one-third of all book-related content on the internet.[14] In addition to traditional fanzines and conventions, Usenet newsgroups and electronic mailing lists were established for fan fiction and fan discussion. Online, searchable archives of fan fiction were also created, with these archives initially being non-commercial hand-tended and specific to a fandom or topic. These archives were followed by non-commercial automated databases. In 1998, the non-profit site FanFiction.Net was launched, which allowed anyone to upload content in any fandom.[15] The ability to self-publish fan fiction in an easily accessible archive that did not require insider knowledge to join, as well as the ability to review stories directly on the site, led the site to quickly gain popularity.[16] A popular example of modern fan fiction is E. L. James's Fifty Shades of Grey, which was originally written as fan fiction for the Twilight series and featured Bella and Edward. To avoid copyright infringement, James changed the characters' names to Ana and Christian for the purposes of her novels,[17] a practice known as 'pulling-to-publish'.[18] Anna Todd's 2013 fan fiction After, about the boy band One Direction, secured a book and movie deal with renamed characters in 2014.[19][20] A movie adaptation, After, was released on April 12, 2019.

On May 22, 2013, online retailer Amazon launched a new publishing service, Kindle Worlds, which allowed fan fiction of certain licensed media properties to be sold in the Kindle Store, with terms including 35% of net sales for works of 10,000 words or more and 20% for short fiction ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 words. However, this arrangement included restrictions on content, copyright violations, poor document formatting, and use of misleading titles.[21] Amazon shut down Kindle Worlds in August 2018.[22]

Japanese dōjinshi

edit

A similar trend began in Japan in the 1960s and 1970s, as dōjinshi, independently published manga and novels, were published by dōjin circles, with many being based on existing manga, anime, and video game franchises. Manga artists such as Shotaro Ishinomori and Fujiko Fujio formed dōjin groups, such as Fujio's New Manga Party (新漫画党, Shin Manga-tō). At the time, artists used dōjin groups to make their debut as professional artists. This changed in the following decades, as dōjinshi became more popular and dōjin groups formed in groups such as school clubs. This culminated in 1975 with the Comiket, a convention in Tokyo that helped to establish the fandom.

Demographics

edit

A 2010 study found that 75.2% of account holders on FanFiction.Net allowed the website to disclose their location and that 57% of accounts originated from the United States, followed by 9.2% created in the United Kingdom, 5.6% in Canada, and 4% in Australia.[23]

A 2020 study of Archive Of Our Own users[24] found that of the surveyed profiles that stated a nationality, 59.7% were located in North America, 16.1% in Great Britain and an additional 10% in Mainland Europe, 6.3% in Oceania, 2.8% in Scandinavia, 2.2% in Asia, 1.8% in South America and the Caribbean, and 0.2% in the Middle East. The study did not include profiles written in Chinese, Greek, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Russian, or Turkish.[24]

Sex and gender

edit

A 2020 study of Harry Potter fan fiction writers on Archive of Our Own found that of the users who disclosed their gender in their profiles, 50.4% were female or femme-leaning and 13.4% were masculine or masc-leaning. 11% of users were transgender, 21% identified as nonbinary, genderfluid, and/or genderqueer, and an additional 3.9% stated that they identified as agender or genderless.[24]

Age

edit

The study also found that fan fiction writers tend to be in their early to mid-20s. Of these writers, 56.7% were university students and young adults, 21.3% were 30 years or older, 19.8% were teenagers, and 0.2% were of retirement age.[24]

Categories and terms

edit
See also: Slash fiction, Femslash, Yaoi, Yuri (genre), and Mary Sue

Genres

edit

In addition to the "regular" list of genres, there are some genres particularly associated with fan fiction. These genres can overlap and include:

Angst

edit

Stories with an angst-ridden mood that focus on a character or characters who are brooding, sorrowful, or in anguish.

Alternative universe (AU)

edit
Main article: Alternative universe (fan fiction)

Stories that feature characters set in a universe other than their canonical one.[25] There are several types of alternative universe: it may make dramatic changes to the setting, such as a "fantasy AU" that places characters from a non-fantasy canon in a world of magic; change characterization, which is often referred to as someone being "out of character" (OOC) rather than a proper AU; or change major plot events to suit the author's purposes, such as in a fix-it fic.[26]

Soulmate AU
edit

Stories that feature characters in a world, often very similar to canon, where soulmates are real. Common mechanics include a person having their soulmate's name written on their skin at birth or a specific change that occurs when two soulmates see or touch each other for the first time. The most common trope in this genre is a character being convinced that they do not have, want, or deserve a soulmate, only to be proven wrong as they fall in love.

Time travel AU
edit

Stories in which a character is sent back in time to get a second chance while having knowledge of the original plot. It is also called "Peggy Sue" after the movie Peggy Sue Got Married, in which this scenario happens to the titular character. "Groundhog Day", named after the film, is a variation of this trope in which time travel happens repeatedly, usually until the time traveler "gets it right".

Crossover

edit

Stories that feature characters, items, or locations from multiple fandoms. Another type of crossover is "fusion fic", in which the two universes are merged into one.

Darkfic

edit

Stories that are darker or more depressing than the original, often done in contrast to them. This is sometimes done with media that is intended to be light-hearted or for children.[27] Darkfic can also refer to content that is "intentionally disturbing", such as physical or emotional violence or abuse. However, not all stories tagged as "dark" are considered to be a darkfic.

"Dead Dove Do Not Eat", sometimes abbreviated as DDDNE, is a sub-category of darkfic.[28] It began as an AO3 tag in 2015, intended to warn people that the story contained dark themes without explicitly condemning them; because the dark themes were tagged, it served to reinforce readers' attention to them. Since 2015, it has evolved into its own tag, meaning that sometimes other dark themes are not tagged and are assumed to be present in the story.

Fix-it fic

edit

Stories that rewrite canonical events that the author disliked or otherwise wanted to "fix", such as major plot holes or a tragic event or ending; for instance, an alternate universe where "everyone lives". Fix-it fics that focus on correcting flaws in the original work are also known as a "rebuild fic", named after the Rebuild of Evangelion series. If it focuses heavily on critical thinking skills and deductive reasoning, it can be considered a "rationalist rewrite", as popularized by Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality.

Fluff

edit

Stories designed to be light-hearted and romantic.[29] Another term for this genre is WAFF, which is short for "warm and fuzzy feelings."

Hurt/comfort

edit

Stories in which a character is put through a traumatic experience in order to be comforted.[30] The climax of these stories is usually when one character witnesses another character's suffering and alleviates it. Another type of hurt/comfort is whump, which focuses on the character's suffering, sometimes to the exclusion of comfort; excessive whump may also be considered darkfic.[31]

Self-insert

edit

Stories in which a version of the author is transported to the fictional world that the fan fiction is based on, which are often written in the first person. Self-insert fanfiction is often compared to Mary Sue characters. Some researchers argue that self-insert characters can be found in literature from the 19th century and earlier.[32] There are several types of self-inserts, including: "y/n" (short for [insert] your name"), "xReader," and "imagines."[33][34] Several of these subgenres are unique to specific platforms.[34]

Recursive | meta | fan-verse

edit

Stories based on an existing fan work. On Archive of Our Own, this type of recursive fan fiction is called a "remix".[35]

Songfic

edit

Stories which are interspersed with the lyrics of a relevant song.[36][37] The term is a combination of "song" and "fiction"; as such, it is also referred to as "songfiction". Since many song lyrics are under copyright, whether songfics are a violation of copyright law is a subject of debate. Some fan fiction sites, such as FanFiction.Net, have prevented authors from posting songfics with lyrics from songs that are not in the public domain.[38]

In an essay in Music, Sound, and Silence in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, University of Sydney professor Catherine Driscoll commented that the genre was "one of the least distinguished modes of fan production" and that "within fan fiction excessive attachment to or foregrounding of popular music is itself dismissed as immature and derivative".[39]

Uberfic

edit

Uberfic is a form of alternative universe in which characters physically resemble and share personality traits with their canon counterparts, but have new names and backgrounds in a different setting. The term originated in the Xena: Warrior Princess fandom[40] and was inspired by the episode "The Xena Scrolls", which featured 1940s-era descendants of the characters Xena, Gabrielle, and Joxer, who are played by their respective actors, on an archaeological dig in an Indiana Jones pastiche. As the concept of the uberfic can be adapted into original fiction, many uberfic authors, such as Melissa Good, Radclyffe, and Lori L. Lake, have legally published their Xena uberfic as original lesbian literature.

Terminology

edit

Author's note (A/N)

edit

Also abbreviated as A/N, author's notes are typically found directly before the beginning or after the end of a fan fiction or its chapters, but can be written at any point in the story and are used to convey direct messages from the author to the reader regarding it.[41]

Beta reader

edit
Main article: Beta reader

Also known as a beta. Someone who edits or proofreads someone else's fan fiction.[42]

Canon

edit
Main article: Canon (fiction)

The original story. This refers to anything related to the original source, including the plot, setting, and characters.[43]

Disclaimer

edit
See also: Legal issues with fan fiction

Disclaimers are author's notes which typically inform readers about who deserves credit for the original source material,[44] and often containing pseudo-legal language disavowing any intent of copyright infringement or alluding to fair use. Such "disclaimers" are legally ineffective and are based on misunderstandings of copyright law, particularly confusion between illegal copyright infringement and unethical plagiarism.[45] Disclaimers have fallen out of use since Archive of Our Own's rise in popularity.

Drabble

edit

A drabble is a piece of writing that is exactly 100 words long,[29] although it is commonly used to refer to any short fan fiction.

Fandom

edit

A fandom is a group of fans of a work of fiction who dedicate their time and energy to their interest. Fan labor, such as fan fiction, is written by fans as a way to express their creativity and love for the original work.

Fangirl/fanboy

edit

A person who is an enthusiastic member of one or more fandoms. The term fangirling/fanboying refers to when a person is excited about a fandom.

Fanon

edit

A portmanteau of fan and canon. It is an "unofficial canon" idea that is widely accepted to be true among fans,[46] but is neither confirmed nor officially endorsed by the original author or source creator, preventing it from being considered canon. Fanon can refer to an interpretation of the original work or details within it.

Head canon (HC)

edit

A fan's personal interpretation of canon, such as the backstory of a character or the nature of relationships between characters.[46] It can be drawn from subtext present in the canon, but cannot directly contradict it. If other fans share this interpretation, it can become fanon.

Mary Sue

edit

A Mary Sue, also known as MS, is a term which editors and writers credit as originating in Star Trek fan fiction and later becoming part of the mainstream. In early fan fiction, a common plot was a minor member of the USS Enterprise's crew saving the life of Kirk or Spock, often being rewarded with a sexual relationship as a result. The term "Mary Sue", which originated in a parody of stories in the wish fulfillment genre, often refers to an idealized or overpowered character who lacks flaws and is often seen as a representation of the author.[47]

One true pairing (OTP)

edit

An abbreviation of the term "one true pairing", referring to a person's favorite ship.[46] OT3, OT4, and so on is the term used for a polyamorous OTP.[46]

One shot

edit

A standalone piece of writing, as opposed to a multichapter work.[48]

Real person fiction (RPF)

edit
Main article: Real person fiction

Stories about real people, usually celebrities, rather than fictional characters. The book After by Anna Todd, later adapted into a film of the same name, was originally a real person fan fiction about One Direction member Harry Styles.

Shipping

edit

Shipping is a variant of romance that focuses on exploring a relationship between two or more characters from the original fandom(s). It has several fandom-specific subgenres, including slash, which focuses on homosexual pairings, and femslash, which is similar but instead focuses on lesbian pairings. The term "shipping" can also refer to a fan who is heavily invested in a relationship between two characters. Writers of fan fiction often use the genre to explore homosexual pairings for popular characters who are not in, or not specified to be in, homosexual relationships in canon.[49] A subcategory of shipping, "curtainfic", which depicts romantic couples in mundane domestic situations such as picking out curtains, was once used but has somewhat fallen out of use.

Smut

edit

Also known as porn or erotica. Sexually explicit or pornographic fan fiction, which can be a part of a story or the entire story. Historically, the terms "lemon", or explicit pornography, and "lime", sexually suggestive works, were euphemisms used to refer to explicit material.[48] These terms were once common in the 2000s, but fell out of use before becoming popular again in December 2018 due to the censorship of adult content on Tumblr, as it allowed writers to circumvent "explicit terminologies" that could get their work flagged by platforms like Tumblr while still being able to tag their work as explicit.

Trigger warning (TW)

edit

Trigger warnings are used to warn people of content in fan fiction that could be harmful or "triggering" for those who have dealt with traumatic situations, allowing them to prepare for or avoid certain content. Sometimes, content warning (CW) is used, either instead of or in addition to a trigger warning.

Trigger warnings are usually used when the subject matter of a work deals with issues such as drug abuse, mental illness, abuse, or extreme violence. Archive of Our Own has codified a system of common warnings into its core tags,[50] requiring authors to either disclose or explicitly choose not to disclose if their work contains graphic violence, major character death, rape, or underage sex.

Interactivity in the online era

edit

Reviews can be posted by both anonymous and registered users on most sites, which are often programmed to notify the author of new feedback. This makes them a common way for readers and authors to communicate online, as well as to help authors improve their writing through constructive criticism.[51][unreliable source?] Occasionally, unmoderated review systems are abused for flaming, spam, or trolling; to prevent this, an author can either disable or enable anonymous reviews, depending on their preference. Fan fiction has also been shown to improve literacy by allowing authors to have a wider audience for their works and encouraging people to write.[52]

Other ways that members of a fandom can participate in their community include gift exchanges and fic exchanges. A gift exchange is an organized challenge in which participants create fan fiction for other participants. They may research what the user receiving their gift enjoys or submissions may include a "letter" explaining what the recipient wants or does not want.[53]

Legality

edit
Main article: Legal issues with fan fiction

There is ongoing debate about to what extent fan fiction is permitted under contemporary copyright law.

Some argue that fan fiction does not fall under fair use, as it is derivative work.[54][55] The 2009 ruling by United States District Court Judge Deborah A. Batts, permanently prohibiting publication in the United States of a book by Ryan Cassidy, a Swedish writer whose protagonist is a 76-year-old version of Holden Caulfield of The Catcher in the Rye, may be seen as upholding this position regarding publishing fan fiction, as the judge stated, "To the extent Defendants contend that 60 Years and the character of Mr. C direct parodied comment or criticism at Catcher or Holden Caulfield, as opposed to Salinger himself, the Court finds such contentions to be post-hoc rationalizations employed through vague generalizations about the alleged naivety of the original, rather than reasonably perceivable parody."[56]

Others such as the Organization for Transformative Works uphold the legality of non-profit fan fiction under the fair use doctrine, as it is a creative, transformative process.[57]

In 1981, Lucasfilm Ltd. sent out a letter to several fanzine publishers, asserting Lucasfilm's copyright to all Star Wars characters and insisting that no fanzine publish pornography. The letter also alluded to possible legal action that could be taken against fanzines that did not comply.[58]

The Harry Potter Lexicon is one case where the encyclopedia-like website about everything in the Harry Potter series moved towards publishing and commercializing the Lexicon as a supplementary and complementary source of information to the series. Rowling and her publishers levied a lawsuit against the website creator, Steven Vander Ark, and the publishing company, RDR Books, for a breach of copyright. While the lawsuit did conclude in Vander Ark's favor, the main issue in contention was the majority of the Lexicon copied a majority of the Series' material and does not transform enough of the material to be held separately from the series itself.[59]

While the HP Lexicon case is an example of Western culture treatment of fan fiction and copyright law, in China, Harry Potter fan fiction is less addressed in legal conflicts but is used as a cultural and educational tool between Western and Chinese cultures. More specifically, while there are a number of "fake" Harry Potter books in China, most of these books are said to be addressing concepts and issues found in Chinese culture. This transformative usage of Harry Potter in fan fiction is allegedly from the desire to enhance and express value to Chinese tradition and culture.[60]

Some prominent authors have given their blessings to fan fiction, notably J.K. Rowling. By 2014, there were already almost 750,000 Harry Potter fan stories on the web, ranging from short stories to novel-length tomes.[61] Rowling said she was "flattered" that people wanted to write their own stories based on her fictional characters.[62] Similarly, Stephenie Meyer has put links on her website to fan fiction sites about her characters from the Twilight series.[63] The Fifty Shades trilogy was developed from a Twilight fan fiction originally titled Master of the Universe and published episodically on fan-fiction websites under the pen name "Snowqueen's Icedragon". The piece featured characters named after Stephenie Meyer's characters in Twilight, Edward Cullen and Bella Swan.[64][65]

However, in 2003, a British law firm representing J.K. Rowling and Warner Bros. sent a letter to webmasters requesting that adult Harry Potter fan fiction ("stories containing graphically violent and sexual content") be removed from a prominent fan fiction website, citing concerns that children might stumble upon the illicit content. In response, the webmasters from several websites hosting adult Harry Potter fan fiction, among other types of fan fiction, "made claims of 'fair use' and nonprofessional status" to justify their right to continue hosting the adult content.[66]

As an example of changing views on the subject, author Orson Scott Card (best known for the Ender's Game series) once stated on his website, "to write fiction using my characters is morally identical to moving into my house without invitation and throwing out my family." He changed his mind completely and since has assisted fan fiction contests, arguing to the Wall Street Journal that "Every piece of fan fiction is an ad for my book. What kind of idiot would I be to want that to disappear?"[67]

However, Anne Rice consistently and aggressively prevented fan fiction based on any of her fictional characters (mostly those from her famous Interview with the Vampire and its sequels in The Vampire Chronicles). She, along with Anne McCaffrey (whose stance has been changed by her son, Todd McCaffrey, since her death) and Raymond Feist, asked to have any fiction related to their series removed from FanFiction.Net.[62] George R.R. Martin is also strongly opposed to fan fiction, believing it to be copyright infringement and a bad exercise for aspiring writers.[68][69] Sharon Lee and Steve Miller, creators of the Liaden universe, strongly oppose fan fiction written in their universe, with Lee saying that "Nobody else is going to get it right. This may sound rude and elitist, but honestly, it's not easy for us to get it right sometimes, and we've been living with these characters ... for a very long time."[70]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "Fanfiction: A Legal Battle of Creativity". Reporter Magazine. February 5, 2016. Archived from the original on February 3, 2018. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  2. ^ Schulz, Nancy (December 31, 2001). "Fan Fiction—TV Viewers Have It Their Way". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2018.
  3. ^ "fan fiction n." Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
  4. ^ a b Jeff Prucher, ed. (2007). "fan fiction". Brave New Words: The Oxford Dictionary of Science Fiction. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-19-530567-8. Archived from the original on February 22, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2019.
  5. ^ John Bristol (1944). Fancyclopedia. The Fantasy Foundation. Archived from the original on January 24, 2016. Retrieved April 22, 2015.
  6. ^ "William Shakespeare – Shakespeare's sources". Encyclopædia Britannica. September 7, 2023. Archived from the original on May 3, 2015. Retrieved March 4, 2019.
  7. ^ Fleming, Colin (April 19, 2017). "The Icelandic Dracula: Bram Stoker's vampire takes a second bite". The Guardian. Archived from the original on September 6, 2019. Retrieved October 26, 2020.
  8. ^ "The early adventures of the apocryphal Sherlock Holmes". The Daily Dot. January 16, 2014. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved October 26, 2020.
  9. ^ "In long-lost play, the author of 'Peter Pan' spoofs 'Sherlock Holmes' and the mystery genre". PBS NewsHour. August 10, 2017. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved October 26, 2020.
  10. ^ Anderson, Hephzibah. "The book that changed Jane Eyre forever". BBC. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved October 26, 2020.
  11. ^ Verba, Joan Marie (2003). Boldly Writing: A Trekker Fan & Zine History, 1967–1987 (PDF). Minnetonka MN: FTL Publications. ISBN 0-9653575-4-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2016. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
  12. ^ Coppa, Francesca (2006). "A Brief History of Media Fandom". In Hellekson, Karen; Busse, Kristina (eds.). Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. pp. 41–59. ISBN 978-0-7864-2640-9.
  13. ^ Bacon-Smith, Camille (2000). Science Fiction Culture. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 112–113. ISBN 978-0-8122-1530-4. Archived from the original on February 22, 2024. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  14. ^ Boog, Jason (September 18, 2008). "Brokeback 33 Percent". Mediabistro. Archived from the original on February 10, 2013. Retrieved January 22, 2012.
  15. ^ Buechner, Maryanne Murray (March 4, 2002). "Pop Fiction". Time. Archived from the original on February 18, 2007. Retrieved May 29, 2010.
  16. ^ Bradley, Karen (Winter 2005). "Internet lives: Social context and moral domain in adolescent development". New Directions for Youth Development. 2005 (108): 57–76. doi:10.1002/yd.142. PMID 16570878.
  17. ^ Marah Eakin (February 12, 2015). "Holy crow! Fifty Shades Of Grey is crazy similar to its Twilight origin story". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on August 18, 2017. Retrieved April 17, 2020.
  18. ^ Brennan, Joseph; Large, David (2014). "'Let's get a bit of context': Fifty Shades and the phenomenon of 'pulling to publish' in Twilight fan fiction". Media International Australia. 152 (1): 27–39. doi:10.1177/1329878X1415200105. S2CID 140471681.
  19. ^ "'After' Movie: Paramount Acquires Rights To Wattpad Book By Anna Todd". Deadline Hollywood. October 16, 2014. Archived from the original on October 7, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2014.
  20. ^ Ford, Rebecca (June 4, 2015). "'Mom' Writer Susan McMartin to Adapt One Direction-Inspired Fan-Fiction 'After' (Exclusive)". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on August 29, 2015. Retrieved September 2, 2015.
  21. ^ Pepitone, Julianne (May 3, 2013). "Amazon's "Kindle Worlds" lets fan fiction writers sell their stories". CNN Money. Archived from the original on June 15, 2013. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
  22. ^ "Amazon to Shut Down Kindle Worlds – The Digital Reader". May 15, 2018. Archived from the original on August 20, 2020. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  23. ^ Kelvin, Lord (March 18, 2011). "Fan Fiction Demographics in 2010". FFN Research. Blogger. Archived from the original on January 10, 2023. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
  24. ^ a b c d Duggan, Jennifer (September 1, 2020). "Who writes Harry Potter fan fiction? Passionate detachment, 'zooming out,' and fan fiction paratexts on AO3". Transformative Works and Cultures. 34. doi:10.3983/twc.2020.1863. S2CID 224983629. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved July 10, 2021.
  25. ^ "FanWorks.org :: Fan Works Inc. – Help & Tools Index". www.fanworks.org. Archived from the original on January 30, 2019. Retrieved January 30, 2019.
  26. ^ Samutina, Natalia (July 3, 2016). "Fan fiction as world-building: transformative reception in crossover writing". Continuum. 30 (4): 433–450. doi:10.1080/10304312.2016.1141863. ISSN 1030-4312. S2CID 147685039. Archived from the original on February 22, 2024. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
  27. ^ "Darkfic – Fanlore". fanlore.org. Archived from the original on February 12, 2019. Retrieved February 11, 2019.
  28. ^ "Dead Dove: Do Not Eat - Fanlore". fanlore.org. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  29. ^ a b Maggs, Sam (2015). The Fangirl's Guide to the Galaxy: a handbook for Girl Geeks. Quirk Books. p. 83. ISBN 9781863747892.
  30. ^ "Fan Fiction Dictionary -- Your Guide To Fanspeak". expressions.populli.net. Archived from the original on April 28, 2016. Retrieved May 12, 2016.
  31. ^ Linn, Rachel Elizabeth (September 15, 2017). "Bodies in horrifying hurt/comfort fan fiction: Paying the toll". Transformative Works and Cultures. 25. doi:10.3983/twc.2017.01102. ISSN 1941-2258. Archived from the original on July 11, 2021. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
  32. ^ ""Too Good to Be True": 150 Years of Mary Sue, by Pat Pflieger". www.merrycoz.org. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  33. ^ "Mary Sue". Fansplaining. March 23, 2017. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  34. ^ a b Sapuridis, Effie; Alberto, Maria K. (June 2022). "Self-Insert Fanfiction as Digital Technology of the Self". Humanities. 11 (3): 68. doi:10.3390/h11030068. ISSN 2076-0787.
  35. ^ "Posting and Editing FAQ | Archive of Our Own". archiveofourown.org. Archived from the original on June 13, 2021. Retrieved July 10, 2021.
  36. ^ Heilman, Elizabeth E. (September 1, 2008). Critical Perspectives on Harry Potter. Routledge. pp. 320–321. ISBN 9781135891541. Archived from the original on February 22, 2024. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  37. ^ Lugmayr, Artur; Zotto, Cinzia Dal (July 23, 2016). Media Convergence Handbook – Vol. 2: Firms and User Perspectives. Springer. p. 148. ISBN 9783642544873. Archived from the original on February 22, 2024. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  38. ^ "Guidelines". FanFiction.net. Archived from the original on March 11, 2016. Retrieved May 27, 2016.
  39. ^ Attinello, Paul Gregory; Halfyard, Janet K.; Knights, Vanessa (January 1, 2010). Music, Sound and Silence in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. pp. 114, 129. ISBN 9780754660415. Archived from the original on February 22, 2024. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  40. ^ "Whoosh!". www.whoosh.org. Archived from the original on May 1, 2008. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  41. ^ Herzog, Alexandra Elisabeth (September 15, 2012). ""But this is my story and this is how I wanted to write it": Author's notes as a fannish claim to power in fan fiction writing". Transformative Works and Cultures. 11. doi:10.3983/twc.2012.0406. Archived from the original on October 8, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2023.
  42. ^ Kelley, Brittany (June 2016). "Chocolate Frogs for My Betas!: Practicing Literacy at One Online Fanfiction Website". Computers and Composition. 40: 48–59. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.001.
  43. ^ Maggs, Sam (2015). The Fangirl's Guide to the Galaxy: a handbook for Girl Geeks. Quirk Books. p. 28. ISBN 9781863747892.
  44. ^ Freeman, Morgan. "A Fanspeak Dictionary". Archived from the original on April 28, 2016. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  45. ^ "Fan Fiction, Plagiarism, and Copyright". March 18, 2012. Archived from the original on November 18, 2017. Retrieved July 27, 2017.
  46. ^ a b c d Romano, Aja (June 7, 2016). "Canon, fanon, shipping and more: a glossary of the tricky terminology that makes up fandom". Vox. Archived from the original on March 20, 2021. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  47. ^ Segall (2008). Fan Fiction Writing: New Work Based on Favorite Fiction. Rosen Pub. p. 26. ISBN 978-1404213562.
  48. ^ a b Maggs, Sam (2015). The Fangirl's Guide to the Galaxy: a handbook for Girl Geeks. Quirk Books. p. 84. ISBN 9781863747892.
  49. ^ Hayes, Sharon; Ball, Matthew (2010), Scherer, B. (ed.), "Queering cyberspace: fan fiction communities as spaces for expressing and exploring sexuality", Queering Paradigms, Switzerland: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 219–240, ISBN 978-3-03911-970-7, archived from the original on August 31, 2022, retrieved October 21, 2020
  50. ^ "Tags FAQ | Archive of Our Own". archiveofourown.org. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved July 10, 2021.
  51. ^ Merlin, Missy (September 13, 2007). "Dr. Merlin's Guide to Fanfiction". Firefox. Archived from the original on May 23, 2008. Retrieved May 7, 2008.
  52. ^ Tosenberger, Catherine (2008) "Homosexuality at the Online Hogwarts: Harry Potter Slash Fanfiction" Children's Literature 36 pp. 185-207 doi:10.1353/chl.0.0017
  53. ^ Romano, Aja (October 1, 2012). "Yuletide, the Internet's biggest "Secret Santa" fanfiction exchange, turns 10". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on July 9, 2023. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
  54. ^ "Library Journal". www.schoollibraryjournal.com. Archived from the original on August 5, 2009.
  55. ^ Chan, Sewell (July 1, 2009). "Ruling for Salinger, Judge Bans 'Rye' Sequel". Cityroom. The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 21, 2011. Retrieved October 5, 2011.
  56. ^ Jenkins, Henry (2003). "Quentin Tarantino's Star Wars?: Digital Cinema, Media Convergence, and Participatory Culture". Archived from the original on March 9, 2009.
  57. ^ Schwabach, Aaron (2009). "The Harry Potter Lexicon and the World of Fandom: Fan Fiction, Outsider Works and, Copyright". University of Pittsburgh Law Review. 70 (3): 387–434.
  58. ^ Gupta, Suman (2009). Re-Reading Harry Potter 2nd Ed. Basingstoke (UK); New York (US): Palgrave Macmillan.
  59. ^ p.36 of Don Tresca. 2014. "Spellbound: An Analysis of Adult-Oriented Harry Potter Fanfiction", pp. 36-46 in Kristin M. Barton and Jonathan Malcolm Lampley (eds.). Fan CULTure: Essays on Participatory Fandom in the 21st Century. London: McFarland & Company.
  60. ^ a b Waters, Darren (May 27, 2004). "Rowling backs Potter fan fiction". BBC. Archived from the original on February 26, 2008. Retrieved April 24, 2008.
  61. ^ "Twilight Series Fansites". StephenieMeyer.com. Archived from the original on October 6, 2011. Retrieved October 5, 2011.
  62. ^ GalleyCat. "The Lost History of Fifty Shades of Grey". mediabistro.com. Archived from the original on July 27, 2014. Retrieved June 30, 2015.
  63. ^ "Fifty Shades of Grey: Stephenie Meyer Speaks Out". mtv.com. MTV. Archived from the original on October 5, 2012. Retrieved September 6, 2012.
  64. ^ pp.36-37 of Tresca (2014)
  65. ^ Romano, Aja (May 7, 2013). "Orson Scott Card's long history of homophobia". Salon.com. Archived from the original on November 6, 2013. Retrieved November 5, 2013.
  66. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions – George R. R. Martin's Official Website". Georgerrmartin.com. Archived from the original on April 14, 2012. Retrieved October 5, 2011.
  67. ^ Martin, George R.R. (May 7, 2010). "Someone Is Angry On the Internet". Archived from the original on June 13, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013.
  68. ^ Sharon Lee, Writer (October 26, 2013). "Lee, Sharon. "The second answer" Sharon Lee, Writer October 26, 2013". Sharonleewriter.com. Archived from the original on February 5, 2019. Retrieved November 5, 2013.

Further reading

edit
edit
 
Wikinews has related news:


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fan_fiction&oldid=1260429356"