The Devunigutta Temple ("God’s hill" in Telugu[2]) or Shiva Temple, Kothur is a Hindu temple near Kothur village in the Mulugu District, Telangana, India, some 60 km east of Warangal.[1][3][4] Located in a remote forested plateau, it was probably built c. 6th century CE by the Vakatakas.[2] It was first recorded in 2012, in an abandoned state, by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI);[3] however, it did not come to wider attention until images were posted on social media in 2017.

Devunigutta Temple
Devunigutta Temple, north and west sides, c. 2017
LocationJayashankar Bhupalpally district, Telangana, India
Coordinates18°6′54.6″N 80°02′13.3″E / 18.115167°N 80.037028°E / 18.115167; 80.037028
Built6th century CE[1]
Architectural style(s)Hindu temple architecture
Devunigutta Temple is located in India
Devunigutta Temple
Location of Devunigutta Temple in India
Devunigutta Temple is located in Telangana
Devunigutta Temple
Devunigutta Temple (Telangana)
Relief sculptures on the outside west wall of the temple; Ardhanarishvara (with a single breast) and other figures

The temple now consists of a square sanctuary with a shikhara or vimana tower,[5] with the sanctuary open to the interior of the tower, and a low wall enclosing an entrance court. An unusual profusion of relief sculptures, though very worn, are located both inside and outside.[2][6] Visiting international scholars, as well as local people, have expressed concern about the condition of the building. Local voluntary groups cleared the vegetation growing on the actual structure,[7] although by 2020 much had regrown. In late 2019 the Archaeological Survey of India was ready to restore the temple, but was awaiting permission from the local authorities.[8]

An image of Narashima was installed after 2012, and the temple is in informal worship.[3]

Rediscovery

edit

Although apparently reported to the ASI in 2012,[3] the temple attracted little attention until photographs were posted on social media in 2017.[2] An Assistant Director of Archaeology and Museums for Telangana state visited the temple in August 2017, and "submitted a report stressing the need to conserve the temple", but as of early 2019 no action had been taken.[9]

A German art historian, Corinna Wessels-Mevissen, who saw the temple in 2018, said “The temple is a unique blend of styles visible in Udayagiri and Scandagiri in Odisha and also a bit of Amaravati like (Andhra Pradesh) architecture.”[10][11]

 
The tower from behind (west face), showing the "cleft" in the wall.

A British expert, Adam Hardy, who visited the temple in 2019, described it as "a unique temple with a rare architecture full of imagery and a depiction of a heavenly vision in sculpture", though he dismissed claims of resemblance to Angkor Wat, saying Devunigutta was in any case older, probably from the 6th century.[12] He was reported as saying "It’s high time the Archaeological Department take the necessary steps to protect the temple which is beginning to collapse."[13]

Corinna Wessels-Mevissen gave a brief report on the temple to a conference in Naples in 2018, and she and Adam Hardy published a paper on it in 2019.[14] Laxshmi Greaves, a colleague of Hardy at Cardiff University, visited the temple separately in 2018, and published an account.[3]

Architecture

edit

The temple has a single enclosed space, about 6 metres square, and now 7 metres high; it is missing the kalasha urn or amalaka that would once have topped it. It is built of blocks of sandstone that have eroded considerably. The blocks are closely fitted, but there are traces of mortar, and a few of reddish stucco, which probably originally covered all the reliefs, and may have been painted.[15] Apart from erosion of the stone, the temple seems generally well-preserved, apart from damage above the entrance and a "long vertical cleft" running down the west wall, which has disrupted the left side of the exterior relief panel with Ardhanarishvara (illustrated).[16] The low wall marking an enclosure in front of the temple is probably not original,[17] and is rather crudely constructed of similar blocks, perhaps originally used for another structure.

A very unusual feature in Hindu temple architecture is that the sanctuary has no ceiling, and visitors can look straight up inside the corbelled shikara/vimana. This is a feature shared with the Gop Temple of about 550 on the other side of India in Gujarat.[18] Usually the flat and unornamented ceiling of the sanctuary is an essential part of the "cave and mountain" architectural metaphor of a Hindu temple. This may relate to apparently wooden temples with octagonal towers seen in some Buddhist reliefs.[19] Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy conclude the temple's "unique architecture provides a missing link between early timber structures and the Dråvida tradition".[2]

 
The external Ardhanarishvara group in 2019

The tower has four tiers, "defined by relief-encrusted string courses", which on the upper tiers are "divided rather haphazardly into bays by plain pilasters". The tower is topped by a low corbelled dome. There is a central projection or bhadra extending across most of each face of the tower. At the lowest level each side except for the east entrance has "a spectacular mythological panel" above a simple moulding.[17] Pilasters make a number of small aedicules, and there are gavakshas at many places, often with faces inside them.[3]

Inside there is now a modern plinth holding an image of Narashima, but no sign of a lingam, nor of a drainage channel for offerings.[15] Local people say a lingam was stolen some time ago.[3]

Leaning against the wall of the enclosed courtyard are three white limestone fragments, one of which appears to be a post from a carved railing typical of Buddhist stupas (e.g., Amaravati Stupa, though these are much larger), although no stupas are known to have existed within 100 km of the temple. They may have been brought to the site as a source of lime for the mortar, or to decorate it.[20]

Reliefs

edit

Reliefs carved into the structural blocks cover "almost every available surface", both inside and out.[15] Though early press reports dwelled on Buddhist-like aspects of the temple, it is clearly a Hindu temple dedicated to Shiva, who appears prominently in the composite form of Ardhanarishvara, divided between his male form and the female one of Parvati, his consort. Ardhanarishvara appears centrally on the reliefs on both the inside and outside of the rear (west) wall of the sanctuary, a feature not known elsewhere.[21]

 
Balarama group on the north exterior wall

The large relief groups "exhibit a homogenous sculptural style essentially reminiscent of Gupta art and other sculptural idioms present in this early period"[15] although the site is a long way from areas controlled by the Gupta Empire by the 460s. They are crowded with figures, above all the very large group occupying the back wall of the sanctuary. The reliefs have many unusual iconographic features, and not all the subjects are yet clear.[3] Together they suggest "the spread of a pre-Tantric form of ascetic Saivism to the South of India".[22]

The three large exterior groups

edit

The Ardhanarishvara group on the outside rear (east) wall has unusual features. Ardhanarishvara, though in a composite male/female form and much the largest figure, has a relatively large female figure on the viewer's left, perhaps a consort. A small elephant-headed Ganesha, child of Shiva and Parvati, is being patted on the head by the figure representing his parents. Both of these features are very unusual; that the figure has four arms is typical. Two other hands hold a lotus flower and a square mirror, and the last is over the head of what may be Skanda, another son of Shiva and Parvati, as a child.[23] The group includes several other rather smaller figures. A bovine head representing Shiva's vahana or "vehicle", the bull Nandi, is seen at the left of his head; the same feature appears on the large south wall relief.[24]

The large group on the exterior north wall probably shows Balarama defeating the evil asura Pralambasura, with his right arm raised to strike the fatal blow to the figure below him, whose head he holds, while his knee presses into his back. To the left of the panel two male worshippers are squatting. Around Balarama's head are four ayudhapurusha figures, personified divine weapons normally associated with Vishnu, a very unusual feature.[25]

The large group on the exterior south wall is "difficult to interpret". It probably shows Shiva in the "royal ease" position, flanked by a male and female figure, and with a dwarf kneeling below him. The male figure appears to touch Shiva's raised foot in a gesture of respect. Next to Shiva's head is another bovine head, and there are a number of other figures, including small flying attendants.[26] Greaves interprets this scene as "Śiva trampling on the demon of ignorance".[3]

Reliefs on the interior walls

edit

Almost the whole of the inside west (rear) wall is occupied with a large relief, crowded with figures in three registers, but with "no apparent visual narrative [that] connects all these images". A large standing two-armed Ardhanarishvara is placed centrally at a low level, with Shiva and Parvati seated above, probably shown in their mountain home on Mount Kailasa, with Nandi. Other figures appear to represent devotees, ascetics, yogis and penitents, perhaps including the temple donors. The side walls show similar scenes.[27]

Other reliefs

edit

The very many smaller reliefs on the exterior walls include, on the first upper level of the west wall, a group of Lakulisha, seated and holding his large mace, with his four disciples, as well as a sixth head at the far right edge, "probably as a kind of 'witness'". There is a comparable group in Cave Temple No. 2 at the Badami Caves in Karnataka, Early Chalukya dynasty, from around 550–570, though there Lakulisha is four-armed and ithyphallic (the latter usual for him at this period); at Devunigutta he is neither.[28]

Other scenes and figures include loving couples (mithunas) and detailed small-scale battle scenes on the horizontal string course blocks separating the upper levels, with infantry, chariots and war-elephants.[25]

Notes

edit
  1. ^ a b Reddy, U. Sudhakar (28 January 2019). "Cardiff expert says no resemblance of Devunigutta architecture with Angkor Wat". The Times of India. Retrieved 5 January 2020.
  2. ^ a b c d e Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 265
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Greaves
  4. ^ "Telangana: Ancient Mulugu temple soon to become tourist attraction". Deccan Chronicle. 4 September 2017. Retrieved 5 January 2020.
  5. ^ "shikhara" to Greaves, "vimana" to Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy. At this locality and date, the northern and southern forms of tower over a sanctuary were just beginning to emerge
  6. ^ Greaves; Telangana Tourism
  7. ^ Telangana Tourism has photos before, during and after.
  8. ^ Newsmeter, "Devuni Gutta temple in Mulugu lies in state of neglect", by Dasari Sreenivasa Rao, 16 December 2019
  9. ^ Reddy, AuthorP Laxma. "Need to conserve Devunigutta temple: Archaeologists". Telangana Today. Retrieved 5 January 2020.
  10. ^ Telangana Today, "Need to conserve Devunigutta temple: Archaeologists", by P. Laxma Reddy, 24th Jan 2019
  11. ^ Reddy, AuthorP Laxma. "Art historian from Germany visits Devunigutta temple". Telangana Today. Retrieved 5 January 2020.
  12. ^ "Cardiff expert says no resemblance of Devunigutta architecture with Angkor Wat", Times of India, U Sudhakar Reddy, Jan 28, 2019
  13. ^ Mahender, Adepu (27 January 2019). "Devuni Gutta: A researcher's paradise". www.thehansindia.com. Retrieved 5 January 2020.
  14. ^ Greaves; Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy is the paper, which is based on the conference report
  15. ^ a b c d Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 267
  16. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 277
  17. ^ a b Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 268
  18. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 267–268
  19. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 269
  20. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 269; there are photos in Telangana Tourism.
  21. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 275; Greaves
  22. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 276
  23. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 269–271
  24. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 270; Greaves (also for photos)
  25. ^ a b Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 272; Greaves (also for photos)
  26. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 272–274, 272 quoted; Greaves (also for photos)
  27. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 273–276; Greaves (also for photos)
  28. ^ Wessels-Mevissen and Hardy, 272; Greaves (also for photos); photo of the Badami group.

References

edit

All these have many good photos.

edit