The 1920 United States presidential election in Louisiana took place on November 2, 1920 as part of the 1920 United States presidential election. Voters chose ten representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Parish Results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ever since the passage of a new constitution in 1898, Louisiana had been a one-party state dominated by the Democratic Party. The Republican Party became moribund due to the disenfranchisement of blacks and the complete absence of other support bases as Louisiana completely lacked upland or German refugee whites opposed to secession.[1] Despite this absolute single-party dominance, non-partisan tendencies remained strong among wealthy sugar planters in Acadiana and within the business elite of New Orleans.[2]
Following disfranchisement, the state’s politics became dominated by the Choctaw Club of Louisiana, generally called the “Old Regulars”. This political machine was based in New Orleans and united with Black Belt cotton planters.[3] Opposition began to emerge with the Progressive movement in the 1910s, chiefly in the southern sugar-growing parishes, where conflicts with President Wilson’s Underwoood-Simmons Act[4] even allowed a Progressive Party member in Whitmell P. Martin[a] to be elected to the Third Congressional District in 1914. Continued opposition to the Choctaws would elect the reformer John M. Parker, originally part of Theodore Roosevelt’s Bull Moose Party, as governor at the beginning of 1920.[5]
During the second term of President Wilson, the Acadian parishes became even more upset with him because of his deep disagreements with Georges Clemenceau, as well as continued problems with the issue of sugar tariffs.[6][7].There was also strong opposition is this part of Louisiana to the Nineteenth Amendment, and also substantial opposition in the Black Belt of the state because it was believed that enfranchising women could interfere with lily-white politics.[8] In the Ozark- and previously Socialist-influenced northern upcountry parishes, opposition to women’s suffrage was much weaker.[8]
Results
edit| Presidential Candidate | Running Mate | Party | Electoral Vote (EV) | Popular Vote (PV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James M. Cox of Ohio | Franklin D. Roosevelt | Democratic | 10[9] | 87,519 | 69.24% |
| Warren Harding | Calvin Coolidge | Republican | 0 | 38,538 | 30.49% |
| Write-ins | — | Independent Republican | 0 | 339 | 0.27% |
Results by parish
edit| Parish | James Middleton Cox Democratic |
Warren Gamaliel Harding Republican |
Write-ins Independent Republican |
Margin | Total votes cast | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Acadia | 1,058 | 47.98% | 1,141 | 51.75% | 6 | 0.27% | -83 | -3.76% | 2,205 |
| Allen | 1,008 | 80.64% | 242 | 19.36% | 766 | 61.28% | 1,250 | ||
| Ascension | 622 | 55.64% | 496 | 44.36% | 126 | 11.27% | 1,118 | ||
| Assumption | 202 | 21.79% | 725 | 78.21% | -523 | -56.42% | 927 | ||
| Avoyelles | 1,422 | 66.26% | 724 | 33.74% | 698 | 32.53% | 2,146 | ||
| Beauregard | 1,146 | 84.14% | 202 | 14.83% | 14 | 1.03% | 944 | 69.31% | 1,362 |
| Bienville | 1,419 | 83.27% | 257 | 15.08% | 28 | 1.64% | 1,162 | 68.19% | 1,704 |
| Bossier | 731 | 94.32% | 44 | 5.68% | 687 | 88.65% | 775 | ||
| Caddo | 4,264 | 91.40% | 401 | 8.60% | 3,863 | 82.81% | 4,665 | ||
| Calcasieu | 2,480 | 83.33% | 483 | 16.23% | 13 | 0.44% | 1,997 | 67.10% | 2,976 |
| Caldwell | 539 | 80.81% | 128 | 19.19% | 411 | 61.62% | 667 | ||
| Cameron | 146 | 92.99% | 11 | 7.01% | 135 | 85.99% | 157 | ||
| Catahoula | 517 | 74.60% | 176 | 25.40% | 341 | 49.21% | 693 | ||
| Claiborne | 1,216 | 96.20% | 48 | 3.80% | 1,168 | 92.41% | 1,264 | ||
| Concordia | 380 | 96.94% | 12 | 3.06% | 368 | 93.88% | 392 | ||
| De Soto | 1,219 | 95.61% | 56 | 4.39% | 1,163 | 91.22% | 1,275 | ||
| East Baton Rouge | 2,336 | 84.09% | 442 | 15.91% | 1,894 | 68.18% | 2,778 | ||
| East Carroll | 247 | 96.86% | 8 | 3.14% | 239 | 93.73% | 255 | ||
| East Feliciana | 529 | 94.63% | 30 | 5.37% | 499 | 89.27% | 559 | ||
| Evangeline | 542 | 48.01% | 587 | 51.99% | -45 | -3.99% | 1,129 | ||
| Franklin | 898 | 83.85% | 173 | 16.15% | 725 | 67.69% | 1,071 | ||
| Grant | 674 | 86.08% | 109 | 13.92% | 565 | 72.16% | 783 | ||
| Iberia | 438 | 25.57% | 1,275 | 74.43% | -837 | -48.86% | 1,713 | ||
| Iberville | 385 | 45.29% | 465 | 54.71% | -80 | -9.41% | 850 | ||
| Jackson | 1,229 | 88.10% | 166 | 11.90% | 1,063 | 76.20% | 1,395 | ||
| Jefferson | 1,238 | 86.57% | 192 | 13.43% | 1,046 | 73.15% | 1,430 | ||
| Jefferson Davis | 728 | 44.86% | 895 | 55.14% | -167 | -10.29% | 1,623 | ||
| Lafayette | 823 | 44.06% | 1,045 | 55.94% | -222 | -11.88% | 1,868 | ||
| Lafourche | 337 | 24.40% | 1,044 | 75.60% | -707 | -51.19% | 1,381 | ||
| La Salle | 570 | 82.13% | 109 | 15.71% | 15 | 2.16% | 461 | 66.43% | 694 |
| Lincoln | 989 | 84.39% | 183 | 15.61% | 806 | 68.77% | 1,172 | ||
| Livingston | 674 | 75.48% | 218 | 24.41% | 1 | 0.11% | 456 | 51.06% | 893 |
| Madison | 331 | 98.81% | 4 | 1.19% | 327 | 97.61% | 335 | ||
| Morehouse | 622 | 94.24% | 38 | 5.76% | 584 | 88.48% | 660 | ||
| Natchitoches | 1,595 | 88.71% | 203 | 11.29% | 1,392 | 77.42% | 1,798 | ||
| Orleans | 32,724 | 64.74% | 17,819 | 35.26% | 14,905 | 29.49% | 50,543 | ||
| Ouachita | 1,481 | 89.98% | 164 | 9.96% | 1 | 0.06% | 1,317 | 80.01% | 1,646 |
| Plaquemines | 329 | 70.15% | 124 | 26.44% | 16 | 3.41% | 205 | 43.71% | 469 |
| Pointe Coupee | 407 | 74.00% | 143 | 26.00% | 264 | 48.00% | 550 | ||
| Rapides | 2,765 | 86.11% | 445 | 13.86% | 1 | 0.03% | 2,320 | 72.25% | 3,211 |
| Red River | 766 | 80.38% | 187 | 19.62% | 579 | 60.76% | 953 | ||
| Richland | 664 | 93.00% | 50 | 7.00% | 614 | 85.99% | 714 | ||
| Sabine | 1,245 | 91.81% | 111 | 8.19% | 1,134 | 83.63% | 1,356 | ||
| Saint Bernard | 358 | 86.47% | 56 | 13.53% | 302 | 72.95% | 414 | ||
| Saint Charles | 183 | 66.55% | 92 | 33.45% | 91 | 33.09% | 275 | ||
| Saint Helena | 366 | 91.04% | 36 | 8.96% | 330 | 82.09% | 402 | ||
| Saint James | 342 | 39.09% | 533 | 60.91% | -191 | -21.83% | 875 | ||
| Saint John the Baptist | 239 | 48.88% | 250 | 51.12% | -11 | -2.25% | 489 | ||
| Saint Landry | 1,017 | 51.91% | 942 | 48.09% | 75 | 3.83% | 1,959 | ||
| Saint Martin | 319 | 43.22% | 419 | 56.78% | -100 | -13.55% | 738 | ||
| Saint Mary | 539 | 40.62% | 788 | 59.38% | -249 | -18.76% | 1,327 | ||
| Saint Tammany | 967 | 77.80% | 276 | 22.20% | 691 | 55.59% | 1,243 | ||
| Tangipahoa | 1,501 | 77.33% | 440 | 22.67% | 1,061 | 54.66% | 1,941 | ||
| Tensas | 243 | 94.19% | 15 | 5.81% | 228 | 88.37% | 258 | ||
| Terrebonne | 477 | 40.08% | 713 | 59.92% | -236 | -19.83% | 1,190 | ||
| Union | 1,221 | 92.57% | 98 | 7.43% | 1,123 | 85.14% | 1,319 | ||
| Vermilion | 549 | 27.87% | 1,420 | 72.08% | 1 | 0.05% | -871 | -44.21% | 1,970 |
| Vernon | 1,143 | 84.79% | 205 | 15.21% | 938 | 69.58% | 1,348 | ||
| Washington | 1,094 | 86.89% | 165 | 13.11% | 929 | 73.79% | 1,259 | ||
| Webster | 1,009 | 90.01% | 112 | 9.99% | 897 | 80.02% | 1,121 | ||
| West Baton Rouge | 352 | 66.79% | 175 | 33.21% | 177 | 33.59% | 527 | ||
| West Carroll | 346 | 73.62% | 104 | 22.13% | 20 | 4.26% | 242 | 51.49% | 470 |
| West Feliciana | 356 | 91.28% | 34 | 8.72% | 322 | 82.56% | 390 | ||
| Winn | 963 | 65.20% | 291 | 19.70% | 223 | 15.10% | 672 | 45.50% | 1,477 |
| Totals | 87,519 | 69.24% | 38,538 | 30.49% | 339 | 0.27% | 48,981 | 38.75% | 126,396 |
Analysis
editIn Acadiana, the 1920 election would see a temporary break with “Solid South” voting patterns, as anger at the Wilson Administration’s foreign and domestic policies caused the region’s voters – much more moderate on racial issues than the rest of Louisiana[11] – to break powerfully from Democratic nominee James M. Cox.[12] Harding carried fourteen of the Acadian parishes, and in the two most sugar-dependent, Assumption and Lafourche, he received over three-quarters of the vote. In the remainder of Louisiana, as racially hardline as anywhere in the South, Democratic voting remained as rock-solid as ever despite nominee James M. Cox suffering a record 26.17 point landslide defeat and carrying only 41 counties outside antebellum slave states and Oklahoma. The revolt in Acadiana, however, was sufficient to drop Louisiana to Cox’ fourth-best state behind Georgia as well as South Carolina and Mississippi (as was typical in the “Solid South” era). As of the 2024 election, this is the last time that a Republican has won a majority in Iberville Parish, as Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump only received pluralities.
See also
editNotes
edit- ^ Martin would join the Democratic Party in 1919.
References
edit- ^ Phillips, Kevin P. (November 23, 2014). The Emerging Republican Majority. Princeton University Press. pp. 208, 210. ISBN 9780691163246.
- ^ Schott, Matthew J. (Summer 1979). "Progressives against Democracy: Electoral Reform in Louisiana, 1894-1921". Louisiana History: The Journal of the Louisiana Historical Association. 20 (3): 247–260.
- ^ Wall, Bennett H.; Rodriguez, John C. (January 28, 2014). Louisiana: A History. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 274–275. ISBN 978-1118619292.
- ^ Collin, Richard H. (Winter 1971). "Theodore Roosevelt's Visit to New Orleans and the Progressive Campaign of 1914". Louisiana History: The Journal of the Louisiana Historical Association. 12 (1): 5–19.
- ^ Sindler, Allan P. (1956). Huey Long's Louisiana: State Politics, 1920-1952. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 40–41.
- ^ See Howard, Perry H. (1954). "One-Party Politics and the Rise of Longism". Political Tendencies in Louisiana, 1812-1952; An Ecological Analysis of Voting Behavior (Thesis). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. p. 144. OCLC 8115.
- ^ Howard, Perry H. (1957). PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 1920 — REPUBLICAN SUPPORT IN SELECTED PARISHES (Map). p. 145. also maps on pp. 145 and 151
- ^ a b Wall and Rodriguez. Louisiana: A History, p. 277
- ^ Dave Leip. "1920 Presidential General Election Results – Louisiana". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
- ^ Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920-1964; pp. 189-190 ISBN 0405077114
- ^ Howard, Perry H. (1954). "A New Look at Reconstruction". Political Tendencies in Louisiana, 1812-1952; An Ecological Analysis of Voting Behavior (Thesis). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. pp. 112–113. OCLC 8115.
- ^ Phillips. The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 268