Wikipedia:Peer review/The Sims 4/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because I am interested in working on an FAC attempt for this. I took this article to GA status in Nov 2022, which involved basically rewriting the entire article, so I can handle any changes/edits from minor to major.
Thanks, Theknine2 (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Brief comment: The lacking features subsection in development belongs to Reception, comment on fan expectations here and not development plans. IgelRM (talk) 20:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I have added this article to the FAC PR sidebar. Please consider reviewing articles listed there. Z1720 (talk) 22:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments from BP!
[edit]Hi there! I'll try what I can to bring up all of the article's possible issues. At first glance, there are still some issues with citations. (Also, can you review my FAC if you're able to? =) )
- You need to link all the publications/websites that has article
- You need to add mission authors from other citations that are missing
- Pls write GamesRadar consistently.
- Remove ScreenRant and TheGamer sources since they are low quality
- Remove ABC news, such a poor quality upon checking it.
- Why is The Independent written like "Indy100"?
- Citation 21, Engadget isn't italicized
- I feel like the reception needs to be expanded. This is just my thought.
- The usage of CNET is quite concerning. FAC reviewers hate that source since it's not a good quality source for most people, unfortunately. So omitting causes a lot of work (but it is required).
This is just a partial review. I really think this article needs a lot of work and I'm also aware that this is very hard to do. Best of luck! 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 12:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)