Talk:Toyota N platform

This article was and is a disaster. How in the hell did anyone manage to create or mess up, such an internet sweeping article, to mislead millions of people who read information from it as credible? This is one of the Toyota Motor Corporation's major platforms and to my knowledge back in the earlier part of the last decade, it was the basis of rear wheel drive unibody Toyota products from 2003 until New N.
Someone down the road randomly went and changed that all to reflect RWD products dating back to 1991, which was grossly fictitious and contradictory. ALL WITHOUT ANY CITATIONS to SUPPORT ANY of the 80s-90s entries. The level of misinformation caused by this page of falsehoods deserves a ban/block for the primarily responsible party.
They went and altered the contents of the N platform being correctly identified post 2003, into some false misleading narrative dating back to 1989-91.
People as fans of Toyota/Lexus or auto enthusiasts/journos who lazily rely on Wikipedia to map out the RWD history of often mute Toyota, have been left entirely misinformed by the drivel posted here for the past several years. I am getting down to the bottom of this, as I knew that the LS 400, LS 430, GS 400, and IS 200 did NOT use the N Platform. K Platform, N Platform, and MC were all new developments, created post 1995 and launched in the early 2000s.
Wikipedia, get a handle on proper quality control and vetting what people edit/post, instead of harassing me over my temperament, due to stupid gaffes like this hurting the information stream of facts and causing horrible rumor mills.

What in Hell?

This article was and is a disaster. How in the hell did anyone manage to create or mess up, such an internet sweeping article, to mislead millions of people who read information from it as credible? This is one of the Toyota Motor Corporation's major platforms and to my knowledge back in the earlier part of the last decade, it was the basis of rear wheel drive unibody Toyota products from 2003 until New N.
Someone down the road randomly went and changed that all to reflect RWD products dating back to 1991, which was grossly fictitious and contradictory. The level of misinformation caused by this page of falsehoods deserves a ban/block for the primarily responsible party.
They went and altered the contents of the N platform being correctly identified post 2003, into some false misleading narrative dating back to 1989-91.
People as fans of Toyota/Lexus or auto enthusiasts/journos who lazily rely on Wikipedia to map out the RWD history of often mute Toyota, have been left entirely misinformed by the drivel posted here for the past several years. I am getting down to the bottom of this, as I knew that the LS 400, LS 430, GS 400, and IS 200 did NOT use the N Platform. K Platform, N Platform, and MC were all new developments, created post 1995 and launched in the early 2000s.
Wikipedia, get a handle on proper quality control and vetting what people edit/post, instead of harassing me over my temperament, due to stupid gaffes like this hurting the information stream of facts and causing horrible rumor mills. Carmaker1 (talk) 21:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)