User talk:Ring2011

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ring2011! I am WikiPuppies and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

WikiPuppies! (bark) 21:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How are these edits vandalism

why are you undoing this edit and warning the ip. Please explain how this is obvious vandalism. [1]. You are on the verge of a 3RR block for edit warring. Please explain Calmer Waters 21:18, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:184.33.74.211 appears to be making good faith edits to these info boxes and templates. If you don't agree with the edits please utilize the BE BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Endlessly undoing thier edits for no obvious rational places you in a disruptive position. Also edit summaries and a personal message stating what your issue is on either the template's or user's talk page might help in a situation such as this. Otherwise it becomes an edit war, if vandalism is not obvious. Kindly Calmer Waters 21:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted these edits 1, 2 by myself. Ring2011 (talk) 21:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User talk:108.32.103.173 with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Jennings

What am I missing here? It looks like Nick Jennings is a redirect to another title in the main article space. —C.Fred (talk) 03:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion and Speedy Deletion nominations of Luke Brookshier

I have added the AfD tag to the article Luke Brookshier for the Articles for Deletion discussion you started, in the future, please make sure to follow all the steps in the AfD listing procedure.

I have challenged your CSD A9 tag on the same page, Luke Brookshier is not a musical recording and is thus not eligible for CSD A9. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:52, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rocko's Modern Life with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mephistophelian (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Fanboy and Chum Chum Episodes

Hi Ring2011, I noticed that you submitted premiere dates for "Crib Notes" and "Tooth or Scare" at List of Fanboy and Chum Chum Episodes. Do you have a verifiable source for that information? If not, I am of the opinion that the date should be removed, as the episode hasn't aired yet, and even planned premiere dates can change. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've deleted the June 18th 2011 airdate that you've submitted for "Crib Notes" and "Tooth or Scare" for the reasons I've listed above. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Edelman

Hi, can you explain why you are reverting the filmography for Randy Edelman? I checked a couple of the movies listed, and he was indeed the composer for them. You are accusing the IP of vandalism, I don't see it but would like to hear your reasoning - thanks! Seaphoto^Talk 04:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Silence of the Clamps

Please STOP deleting the redirect. Twitpics and Infosphere are horrible sources. If you revert again, I'll just take it to WP:AFD, but discuss it with me here. CTJF83 17:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to weigh in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Silence of the Clamps CTJF83 17:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ring2011 does not want to be blocked

I really don't wanna be blocked. Ring2011 (talk) 18:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then Please STOP adding poorly sourced twitter references. See WP:V and WP:SPS CTJF83 18:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Ctjf. I won't add poorly sourced twitter references. Ring2011 (talk) 18:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gorillas in the Mist (American Dad!)

The article Gorillas in the Mist (American Dad!) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 02:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gorillas in the Mist (American Dad!) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gorillas in the Mist (American Dad!) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorillas in the Mist (American Dad!) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 23:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of The Penguins of Madagascar episodes (season 2). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 02:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to 2011–12 United States network television schedule. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. KnownAlias X 02:45, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of programs broadcast by WGN America. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pinkadelica ^♣ 23:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:65.8.219.174 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Remember that Wikipedia WELCOMES new users. What you did to this IP user was short of threatening over ONE edit by using multiple warnings. Please remember to assume good faith and don't act as though you, or any other editor owns articles. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 18:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:65.8.223.192. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 18:39, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Hell's Kitchen (U.S.). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you had clicked the reference, would have seen that July 19th is the correct date. Hasteur (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism , such as the edit at Monsters vs. Aliens, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. - SudoGhost ™ 21:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for before

I didn't see you add any sources to that Futurama (season 6) edit in the edit history, but I forgot to check if sources already existed. You were fine, and I removed my warning. Sorry, dude. KnownAlias X 23:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Monsters vs. Aliens. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Mifter (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Cleveland Show season 2 DVD.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Cleveland Show season 2 DVD.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:09, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring at Monsters vs. Aliens

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Monsters vs. Aliens. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. - SudoGhost ™ 22:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SudoGhost, I don't want to be blocked. Ring2011 (talk) 22:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hrs for edit warring, as you did at List of Back at the Barnyard episodes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 20:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you were blocked for edit-warring, not violation of WP:3RR. This edit summary says it all. Toddst1 (talk) 20:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 14)

Hello Ring2011. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 14), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Courcelles 18:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AIV block request declined: User:CoolZoog

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Your AIV block request regarding User:CoolZoog has been declined. Please study WP:NOTVAND regarding what is and is not vandalism, and in particular remember that "4im" warnings (also known as "final" or "only" warnings) should be placed only in cases of extreme disruption and/or defamation. WP:BITE might be instructive reading, as well, as might WP:CIV, which is a core policy of Wikipedia. Tonywalton ^Talk 00:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fanboy and Chum Chum Episode List P2

Hi Ring2011, I would appreciate if you would please stop adding episode airdates that occur in the future, as you did once again for Crib Notes and Tooth or Scare at List of Fanboy and Chum Chum episodes recently. If something hasn't aired yet, there shouldn't be an airdate listed. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Fanboy and Chum Chum episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. While I usually assume good faith, the fact that I've asked you twice to not submit airdates for episodes, coupled with how you have ignored these requests, leads me to believe that you are intentionally trying to disrupt the Fanboy episode page. The previous times you've submitted airdates, the episodes did not air on those dates. And even if the episodes *DO* air on their planned airdates, it doesn't make any sense to add the information until it happens. Please stop creating unnecessary work for people. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Fanboy and Chum Chum Episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Ring: I've asked you three times to not submit airdate information for this show until the episodes actually air. You've ignored me several times, and you have submitted erroneous information to Wikipedia as a result each time. Most recently you submitted bad data for the episode Rattleskunkupine! which did not air on the day you claimed it would air. Further, you spelled the episode name incorrectly, and the production number you submitted was wrong. As I've said before, I usually assume good faith edits on your part, but given your history of controversial edits, and your history of edit blocks, I'm once again asking you to control your emotional edits, or I will nominate you for administrative intervention. While Wikipedia encourages its editors to be bold, they don't encourage editors to use crappy sources (like the uncited ones you are referencing for your Fanboy edits.) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:15, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fan Fiction

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Take Two with Phineas and Ferb. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Inappropriate warning

The warning you left at Nickelodeon745's page is completely inappropriate. Please do not "shout" at users like that by using all caps. You also should not threaten users in the tone you did. Additionally, your report of this user to AIV was inappropriate. He had not edited after your warning to him. I have removed him from AIV and replaced your warning on his talk page with a more appropriate one. Please be more mindful of your warnings and reporting in the future. Thank you, either way (talk) 20:41, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ring2011, I also would urge you not to use language like "KEEP IT UP AND YOU'RE BLOCKED" because you are not an administrator. That sort of sharp, emotional language suggests that you wield authority, which you do not, and I'm sure that pretending to be an administrator is probably not something Wikipedia encourages. I also notice that you are warning that user for doing the same thing ("Addition of unsourced content") that you've been warning for doing yourself. For the sake of your fellow Wikipedians, please keep a level head. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice on Last Edit on the "Inside Edition" article

Hey there, I wanted to let you know that I corrected the format based on distribution and screen format used by the national networks (e.g. NBC, CBS, FOX, ABC). The edits that I made were based on the Wikipedia articles 1080i and 720p. For example, Inside Edition is taped in 1080i, not 720p, given that the show is produced and distributed by CBS. CHAK 001 ^{(Improvements? Please let me know!)} 05:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence

Vigilance

Thumbs up for keeping TV programming listings clean and accurate here at the Wiki. Keep up the good work

Digifan23 22:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hot Cocoa Bang Bang.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hot Cocoa Bang Bang.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons

I just wanted to ask something about the 23rd season of the Simpsons. In your edit summary, you wrote, "Be careful." What do we have to be careful about? I just want to know, that's all. Queen of smart alecks 10:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Next Year's TV Schedule

I was watching all your edits and noticed that some of them aren't true. If they really were true, please provide a source. Thanks. 68.44.179.54 (talk) 11:26, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following up from what the person above said here about your edits on Touch . I've been keeping a close eye on this series and I haven't seen anyone report this same thing, not even a rumor. If you provide a reference, then I'd agree with your edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.150.246.9 (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even know what is vandalism?

Why did you revert all my edits? They were perfectly legit and they corrected the order of the episodes of List of Back at the Barnyard episodes. I thought you only revert edits because of vandalism but this is clearly not vandalism. PwilliamQ99 (talk) 23:11, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PwilliamQ99, Those airdates are correct, Those airdate are incorrect when you revert edits. Don't do it. Thanks and Have a nice day. Ring2011 (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true. The episodes were shown on TV LAST year. How could they have a 2011 air date when they were already broadcasted in 2010? PwilliamQ99 (talk) 23:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The episodes weren't shown on TV in 2010, They were 6 unaired, And it was on hiatus in March 2011, When Nicktoons announced in August 2011 that 6 unaired episodes started on September 12, 2011. Nicktoons is airing the final 6 episodes of Barnyard. Remember? Ring2011 (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be mistaken. In December 2010, there was a Christmas marathon where they aired 12 hours of Barnyard episodes. And I remember clearly that episodes like "Clan of the Cave Cow" (which you claim to have a 2011 air date) was indeed aired last year. PwilliamQ99 (talk) 23:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, "Clan of the Cave Cow" did not air last year, It aired on September 19, 2011 Please see September 2011 Premiere Info, October 2011 Premiere Info and November 2011 Premiere Info on Toonzone.net? Ring2011 (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd because I do remember that it did indeed air on Nick Canada last December. Don't know if it's different in the United States or not, but in Canada, these episodes did indeed air in 2010. PwilliamQ99 (talk) 00:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the United States, These episodes did not air in 2010, It did aired in 2011. See Toonzone.net. Ring2011 (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, shouldn't we include the airdates outside of United States too? See this edit (scroll down). PwilliamQ99 (talk) 00:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only January 2, 2010 to September 18, 2010 on Nickelodeon in the United States. 65.8s says that Season 3 was fake. But for Nicktoons. Remaining episodes started on September 12, 2011 with the episode "Treasure Hunt" and will end Tomorrow night with the episode "Aliens!!!". That's enough talking for now. Ring2011 (talk) 00:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All My Children

Hi. In case you're wondering what happened to your edit, I have moved it on the fourth paragraph of the lead because it was too detailled to be mentionned on the first paragraph. However I did removed the info on the first paragraph that said that All My Children would be relauched in January 2012. Also, I have replaced the source you've provided with another source because TV By The Numbers is a fan site, thus not an acceptable reference on Wikipedia.

Regards Farine (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism reports

Please do not file frivolous reports at AIV. What you are reporting is not remotely vandalism. If anything, it's a non-controversial move. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Flintstones (2013 TV series)

A tag has been placed on The Flintstones (2013 TV series), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G11 violation; Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 20:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Flintstones (2013 TV series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Flintstones (2013 TV series), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 21:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hi Ring2011. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for List of The X Factor USA finalists (season 1), a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. not applicable for r3 LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 21:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ring2011. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for The X Factor (US season 1), a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. not applicable for r3 LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 21:48, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ring2011. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for The X Factor (USA), a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. not applicable for r3 LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 21:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ring2011. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Template:X Factor USA sidebar, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. not a misrepresentation of policy LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 21:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Man Up!"

Regarding your edit on Man Up: when network executives says that they "pulled" a show, that often means "we ended it, but we will probably air the remaining episodes we shot in a time slot were no one will watch them."

"Production on the ABC Studios series' 10 episode has already wrapped, with remaining episodes possibly being burned off in the summer." - Hollywood Reporter.
"ABC notes the comedy isn’t officially canceled..." - Entertainment Weekly.
"It is unclear when the remaining 5 will run as a burnoff." - Deadline.com.

So until then, remove all suggestions that the show has been cancelled from the page. It is not cancelled...yet. Freshh (talk) 22:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One Life to Live

Please do not add ending dates or ending years on shows articles as you did with this edit until they have aired their final episode. The present always has priority over the future here on Wikipedia. Thank you. Farine (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Allen Gregory. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Provide a reference saying it is canceled, not just one that says it isn't on the schedule. CTJF83 03:00, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KIAH CW39 2012 logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KIAH CW39 2012 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. —David Levy 20:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monsuno Does Premiere on February 23rd

If you look at Nicktoons during the commercial breaks, they show a promo for Monsuno confirming it airs February 23rd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon23812 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season Finale

Please be sure you have a reliable source for a season finale before adding the date to an article. I've reverted several of your additions of erroneous, and unsourced, season finale dates across multiple articles, most recently for Kitchen Nightmares, which has scheduled two episodes after the date you contend was the season finale. Please be careful about using reliable sources to verify a season finale date. When in doubt, leave it out. --Drmargi (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A source announcing the start date for one series is not a reliable source for the finale of another unless is explicitly states a finale date. Gordon Ramsay may have a new show starting in April, but the finale of KN is not discussed in the source you cited, and it cannot be used to infer a finale date for KN. Please avoid such drawing of conclusions in the future, and be sure you have a source that explicitly identifies the finale date for Kitchen Nightmares. --Drmargi (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 in American television

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page 2012 in American television appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 23:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Please do not remove reports about yourself; leave it to the admins to assess the reports. Further instances of removing reports will, in themselves, result in a block. TerriersFan (talk) 00:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article PlayStation 2, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. No source for your discontinuation claim, and a Google search provides nothing. GSK (t ● c) 03:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Mario Party appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Salvidrim! 04:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please do not add content for which you do not have a reliable source. The Zocalo Restaurant to be featured on Kitchen Nightmares is in Philadelphia, not Chicago. If you're not sure or the Fox schedule doesn't say, don't guess, which is what you've clearly done -- leave the location out. And don't persist in reverting, and thereby edit warring, on the strength of a guess. The restaurant location is now sourced; any further reverts will be treated as edit warring and may result in you being blocked from editing. --Drmargi (talk) 05:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Alcatraz (TV series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 02:39, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Regarding your recent edits to the Season 2 production numbers at List_of_T.U.F.F._Puppy_episodes, please note that you don't yet have consensus to make those edits. I began a discussion on the article's talk page after your edit war with various users circa May 2nd-May 5th. Rather than continuing to submit the same disputed information against the prevailing argument, please collaborate by joining the discussion on the Talk Page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Greg Bailey/WCNC and KTRK

The fact that Greg Bailey has been hired by another station doesn't mean he's left WCNC yet. He's not "former staff" until he's actually left the station. JTRH (talk) 00:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GoodAfternoonAmerica.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GoodAfternoonAmerica.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Weekend Marketplace. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Powergate92Talk 03:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A.M.E.N.

Can you tell Gridlock Joe that A.M.E.N. is moved from KUVM 36:5 (38:5) to KUGB 28:3 (40:3), due to MundoFOX. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.90.60.70 (talk) 04:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm baaaack!!! Sorry for took out so long that my old modem is down and i'm back to editing Wikipedia? Yes i'll tell him. Ring2011 (talk) 01:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Splenter source

I Just wanted to know that on September 19th, I filled in for you while you were having a problem with that old modem. 68.28.179.112 (talk) 02:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for filling in for me while i was having a problem with my old modem. Ring2011 (talk) 02:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. 68.28.179.113 (talk) 02:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yarn Yoshi

Hello, Ring2011. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Yarn Yoshi, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 23:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yarn Yoshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yarn Yoshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yarn Yoshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 21:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ABC vs Disney-ABC Domestic Television

Just a quick note about this edit. Katie wasn't renewed by ABC. It was instead renewed by Disney-ABC Domestic Television.

Broadcast television networks don't renew syndicated shows. These shows are instead renewed by their respective syndication distributors which can either be Disney-ABC Domestic Television, CBS Television Distribution, NBC Universal Television Distribution or Twentieth Television.

Thank you. Farine (talk) 22:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Hurricane! - The Cleveland Show Promo.jpg

There is nothing substantial about this TV screenshot. The shocked expressions of the family is not of critical commentary, so I wonder if you object to removing this image from Wikipedia. --George Ho (talk) 01:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Paula Faris

Hi, I'm Anne Delong. Ring2011, thanks for creating Paula Faris!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some titles to your citations. I have combined several identical references for you. —Anne Delong (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

March 2013

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:DreamWorksFan. Thank you. Don't wikihound other users. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 22:09, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My Computer crashed

Hey Everyone this is Ring2011, You probably know that my computer got crashed around 3:00 this morning, So I'm using the iPhone until I get a new computer. Ring2011 (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ring2011 is Back after having problems

I'm Back on the Computer, My old Computer that included Windows XP got crashed, I got a new one, It's Windows 7, It's good to be back on the computer again, This is the first going on the internet not to have dial-up, I now have Wi-Fi, Thanks to AT&T Internet services for setting us up, Take care now. Ring2011 (talk) 02:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On the Wii

Ring2011, Good news, I'm on the Wii. 108.244.218.197 (talk) 07:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Super Mario Bros. 3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Super Mario Bros. 3. Since you had some involvement with the New Super Mario Bros. 3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Darrman (talk) 15:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Super Mario Bros. 3 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Super Mario Bros. 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Super Mario Bros. 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Digifan23 (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Hurricane! - The Cleveland Show Promo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Hurricane! - The Cleveland Show Promo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yarn Yoshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yarn Yoshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yarn Yoshi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Digifan23 (talk) 21:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Chew Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Chew Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 01:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]