Jump to content

User talk:Brianann MacAmhlaidh/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Medieval Norwegian arms

 Done

Sorry for lateness, Sodacan (talk) 03:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Wow. Beautifully done. Thanks Sodacan.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

de Vescy arms

Hi Brianann, was reading the Osprey Campaign series on Bannockburn and found a coat of arms (p.76.) and effigy (p.81.) once housed at St. Marys at York which has a different variation to the coat of arms as depicted on William de Vescy of Kildare. Copy of book can be downloaded from here [1]. Regards Newm30 (talk) 06:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

@Newm30: Hi. Generally, I don't think we should regard Osprey publications as totally reliable for history or heraldry. They tend to be in the genre of popular history. The Bruce McAndrew book Scotland's Historic Heraldry is reliable for heraldry. It gives the arms pictured in the article and cites the Parliamentary Roll, which dates to 1312. This doesn't necessarily mean that the Osprey book is wrong. The bend was sometimes used to illustrate illegitimacy, and William was indeed illegitimate, so that makes sense. I've Googled around a bit and came across two hits in Google Books that seem to mention the effigy in the Osprey Book, and indeed associate an effigy with William (one is "The Yorkshire Archaeological Journal" of 1929; the other is "The Publications of the Harleian Society" of 1946). One of the hits blazons the inscribed arms as "A cross flory, over all a bend", which corresponds to the Osprey illustrations. Unfortunately Google is only showing snippets so I can't get a good idea of what is written.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 02:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
In the link to the PDF book [[2]] you can download book and view the photo of the effigy on p. 81. Regards Newm30 (talk) 02:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Yep, I've looked through it. I just wish I could read the two Google Books hits I noted that seem to refer to the same effigy.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 02:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Found "The Yorkshire Archaeological Journal" of 1929 but not "The Publications of the Harleian Society" of 1946. Regards Newm30 (talk) 06:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
After reading the 1929 Journal it sends you to the 1924 Journal Newm30 (talk) 07:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for linking to those. I've incorporated them into the article.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox surname

Template:Infobox surname has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox personal name. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brianann MacAmhlaidh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christina of the Isles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C11 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Norse mythology

Hello just wanted to ask for some info into Norse mythology. Would like to know where you receive your sources on the old Norse mythology, as I am quite interested in the topic personally. I would welcome any advice if you would like to share any...many thanks for posting your research into the Ragnar Lodbrok saga also! .Memosamurai77 (talk) 04:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

@Memosamurai77: Hello. If you search Google Scholar you should be able to identify good sources (like books and journal articles) on any topic. The next step is to find these sources. Some of these books might be viewable on Google Books or Open Library. Some of the journal articles might be available on JSTOR (which I have access to through Wikipedia). I used to have access to Oxford Scholarship Online, De Gruyter Online, and Questia through Wikipedia, but don't anymore. Sometimes scholars put their work on Academia.edu, so that's another good site to search. Internet Archive is a great website for old primary sources like sagas and chronicles.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arnulf de Montgomery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-Norman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

The Picts. By Benjamin Hudson.

I have added an alert to your post on Talk:Picts [3], with the full comment in a new section thereon. In short, a recent review of Benjamin Hudson's book is extremely critical of a number of errors and outdated concepts.
ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 22:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Wow. I actually read that book. I wish I had access to the review. Thanks for letting me know.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I have access to EUP journals through WP:TWL; I can e-mail you the text of the review if you like (it isn’t very long).—Odysseus1479 01:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Odysseus. I've sent you an email.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Comyn of Kilbride branch

Hi Brianann, I was wondering whether you could advise what Bruce McAndrew in Scotland's Historic Heraldry states in regards to the heraldry of the Comyns of Kilbride? Regards Newm30 (talk) 02:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

If found the Kilbride branch mentioned on a couple pages. On page 43, McAndrew states that the heads of the Badenoch, Buchan, and Kilbride branches bore (on their seals) "three garbs without any brisure" towards the end of the thirteenth century. In the accompanying footnote, he states that the seal accorded to John Comyn of Kilbride in Scottish Amorial Seals (#588) can't be his, and warns that the Comyn seals and genealogical info in Scottish Amorial Seals is not to be relied upon.
On pages 159-160, McAndrew mentions a seal borne by John de la Beche had a coat of arms which contained a quarter blazoned: "gules a garb argent". McAndrew takes this possibly symbolising maternal Comyn of Kilbride ancestry. As such, he thinks that the Kilbride arms could have been: "Gules, three garbs argent"; and he also states that the red field could indicate that the "Kilbride branch descended from the first wife of William Comyn rather than the second". I can't view the chart he refers to, and I don't know the genealogy of the family. Earlier on page 159, he notes that the Kilbride branch daughter-out with Edmund Comyn and his two daughters, Euphemia (died 1361) and Maria; Euphemia married William de la Beche (died 1333).--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Brianann, much appreciated. Regards Newm30 (talk) 23:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tomrair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brianann MacAmhlaidh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Crookston, Glasgow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Anglo-Norman
Robert Croc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Anglo-Norman

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Máel Coluim, son of the king of the Cumbrians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Scandinavian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dungal MacDouall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rushen Castle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

ANI etc

I don't know if you saw what happened at ANI, but as you're one of the people this user caused problems for, I'd encourage you to look over the warnings others gave him, the checking into the "sources" he was using, and the fact he's now been blocked twice. Feel free to do cleanup on changes he revert-warred into articles where you know he was using bad sources and/or OR. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Wow. I missed that. I was having a little trouble, but I thought we were working through it. I'll look over the articles.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brianann_MacAmhlaidh/Archive_8&oldid=880551161"