Talk:The Harrow

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I created a page for Pagliassotti, Dru, the publisher of the Harrow, having become aware that she has now published a well received novel titled "Clockwork Heart". I attempted to make the page in her full name Dru Pagliassotti, but was unable to do so, as a search for that name gets redirected to this page instead. I don't know how to remove the redirect.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrpearcee (talk • contribs) 05:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the fact that a large % of the 30k hits for ""The harrow" horror" on google suggests that this 10 year old project is noteworthy. In the context of publishing on the web itself, Harrow could be seen as an early and sustained part of the community. That and the numerous awards it has won for its online publishing. I think that the question should be how much more content needs to be added to show the need for it to have a wikipedia page, rather than just deleting it. Patience is a virtue. --Jasonnolan 18:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the primary sources, notability and stub flags as sources have been added and after seeing that pages such as Nemonymous have not been flagged, this page must be adequate. Note that google searches for 'theharrow.com' yields over 12000 hits, including what's noted above. Note as well, that being a decade long online publication that has published continuously it in itself. If there are problems with this then please clarify exactly why this page would be flagged while others that are more stub or less notable are not flagged. We do want to do the right thing, which we appear to have done. --Jasonnolan 22:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo3b.gif

Image:Logo3b.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]