User talk:Md Sunnat Ali Mollik

Welcome!

Hi Md Sunnat Ali Mollik! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! GPL93 (talk) 05:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Md Sunnat Ali Mollik. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 05:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Md Sunnat Ali Mollik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Md Sunnat Ali Mollik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 22:54, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Md Sunnat Ali Mollik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Md Sunnat Ali Mollik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 14:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Md Sunnat Ali Mollik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Md Sunnat Ali Mollik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 23:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop moving this article into mainspace and read the information about writing autobiographies that was placed on this page. MB 23:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 10:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now say How can I return to Wikipedia? Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 10:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are replying to a post clearly made over a year ago, someone who has no way of knowing you replied. As I've said, you don't seem competent to edit. Doug Weller talk 11:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me how can I get back to editing. I apologize for my previous actions. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 16:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Md Sunnat Ali Mollik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Md Sunnat Ali Mollik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 06:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Md Sunnat Ali Mollik

The article Md Sunnat Ali Mollik has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gusfriend (talk) 07:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Md Sunnat Ali Mollik

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Md Sunnat Ali Mollik has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a real person or group of people that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Primefac (talk) 08:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of this article has now been disabled. Stifle (talk) 08:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear admin,

@Doug Weller

please unblock me, I admit my mistake. Misunderstood about wikipedia. I understand about wikipedia and won't be wrong please give it a chance Want to contribute to Wikipedia. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop contacting me, make an appeal as instructed above. Doug Weller talk 18:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am appealing Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 18:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have made an exception, you can resolve it if you want. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven’t made an exception and you haven’t made a proper unblock. Doug Weller talk 19:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Please pick up the tied donation. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 19:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not even convinced you are capable of editing. You are unable to undo your deletion of the block notice, you seem unable to use the block notice, and now you are talking nonsense about a tied donation. Are you trying to bribe me? Doug Weller talk 19:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about bribery? I need some help from you how to get back to Wikipedia. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 05:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here I am creating multiple accounts without knowing about Wikipedia. I am currently learning about Wikipedia. That's why I want one chance. Want to contribute to Wikipedia. For my previous work Apologize. I will never violate the rules on Wikipedia. Please unblock me thanks.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but it's not possible to edit an encyclopedia in a language you're not able to use. Google Translate isn't good enough for such a purpose and will sometimes produce nonsense, as Doug Weller says. I am declining your unblock request both because of the original block reason and for competence issues. You will surely do better in the Wikipedia of your native language! Bishonen | tålk 08:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I note that when I asked if your comment about a tied donation was an attempt to bribe me and you didn't understand. In fact I didn't think you were trying to bribe me, but it looks as though you are using Google translate or something like it to write. Is that the case? Doug Weller talk 07:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

google translate Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 07:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which is turning out nonsense at times, nonsense which you don't recognise. If you are doing it here, even when I point it out, you'd do it in articles. We can't have that. Sorry, but I don't think you are competent enough in English to edit. That in addition to the problem that got you blocked originally. Doug Weller talk 07:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was published before I finished writing it. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 07:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Please give me a chance. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 07:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Please give me one chance. I apologize for my previous actions. I promise to follow all the rules from now on and take your advice. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 08:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen Give me one chance. I got idea about wikipedia. No more mistakes. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 08:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good idea to lie to us - this is a sock account

You've also edited as মোঃ ছুন্নত আলী মল্লিক, who is blocked as a sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Md Sunnat Ali Mollik/Archive. You know about multiple accounts as this account is one of them. I'm one of the few Admins able to check accounts for socking. Doug Weller talk 11:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear,

Admin

@Doug Weller

I mean creating multiple accounts. Apologies for not knowing about Wikipedia. I have learned about wikipedia to say. Don't be wrong, please give me a chance. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 11:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating multiple accounts unknowingly. Please give me one chance. I promise to abide by the Wikipedia rules. Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not true. You are not creating multiple accounts unknowingly. Your socks on Bengali Wikipedia were blocked as early as July 2022, so from then on you did know about Wikipedia, in the sense of knowing it is wrong to create sockpuppets. Your access to editing this page has been removed, see below, because you are abusing it. Bishonen | tålk 18:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC).[reply]

June 2023

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Bishonen | tålk 18:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer needed because I understand what I was blocked for, I will not do it again and I will instead contribute productively. 2400:C600:4529:1810:1:0:178E:191E (talk) 08:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is improper for you to request unblock via an IP address. You must follow the instructions provided above to request unblock via UTRS. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.