User talk:Killdevil

Hello, folks. Not much here at the moment.

Killdevil 15:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:109903main S96-06240.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:109903main S96-06240.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Added a public domain indication

I added a public domain tag to the image as requested.

Inline footnotes:

I have noticed the great contribution you've been making to the Dinosaur article! Well done! But on a down side, there is something I was meaning to talk to you about. The dinosaur article is a featured article, & we want it to be kept spotless. However, the introduction of external links in the text is not of featured article quality. We would like everyone on the Dinosaur article to put all external links as footnotes. To see how to do this, see my extra long post on this page; User_talk:WAS_4.250#Dinosaur_edit_summary. Follow one of my links towards the bottom which will show how to do this. It's quite easy & people will marvel at the amount of knowledge you have at doing footnotes. Plus it will keep the article tidy & formal. Further more, as you'll probably see by looking at Was's talk page, I get pretty crazy & mad when someone stuffs up the dinosaur article, which I've spent a long time working on. Thanks for listening.... Spawn Man 01:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done for at least giving the footnote thing a go. I didn't get it the first thousand times I tried it. Well done! I just tydied it up for you so it was perfect. Thanks, If everyone did that, there would be a lot more time to relax.... Spawn Man 01:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur

Thank you, I finished up tonight. I was bold see the talk page. I also added some links to the See also I would appreciate if they stay. Hopefully that will defuse any religious issues. -- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 07:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TGV

I know my wording about the 1.5 kV lines around Paris was a bit jumbled; what I'm trying to say is that it's the lines electrified at 1.5 kV which are common around Paris, rather than lignes classiques, which are all over the country (I'm pretty sure). Willkm 00:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, good wording. I've removed the middle bit because I think it's clearer without it. Willkm 00:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding: Elasmosaurus_2.jpg

Can you please state your source for this image. I have found an identical image with a very clear HarperCollins copyright tag. I have labelled this image as a copyright violation and it will be deleted if you don't provide the source for it. I would love to use this image myself on Wikibooks, so if you have a legitimate US-government source I would be glad.--Konstable 07:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs

Hi, I got the Dinosaur article to the main page, & as a result, watch who edits it closely. Seeing you have a keen interest in dinosaurs, due to your extensive edits to the dinosaur article, I'd like to suggest that you join Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs, as we have few members & even fewer specialists. We'd love for you to join. If you decide to do so, enter your name on our participants list & slap one of those dinosaur user boxes on your user page. Thanks, Spawn Man 06:58, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the project, glad to have you on board.... I'm the main co-ordinator, so contact me (or someone else....but mainly me.... muahahaaaaaaaa!) if you have any questions. Right now we're trying to write a stub for every single damn dinosaur, even if it's a crappy stub. Thanks, Spawn Man 02:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]

New Task bar

I've successfully created an open list of tasks on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs main page for those who would actually like to know what to do with their time on the project. Add tasks as you wish, no too long though! Add your name to tasks you wish to be part of & that's as complicated as it gets... Thanks, Spawn Man 23:29, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WP Dinos project

Hi Killdevil, Thanks for recently joining the WP Dinosaur project. As you have already commented, it's a huge project. I know you want to start with 20 most popular new dinosaur pages... The problem is that there are 1,086 dinosaurs listed on the list of dinosaurs page, but only a few of the most popular (T-Rex, etc) have actually been created. I've been occupied the past few days creating stub articles for hundreds of dinosaurs, but they *all* need expanding. A few volunteers have been able to add a couple of additional pages, but there are still 500 or more dead/red links. ANYwhere you start will be a big help. You could even add the {WikiProject Dinosaurs} tag to the talk pages of every created article (I've only done that to the dinosaurs under letter A; B-Z are still missing it), or expand on existing articles (like adding references, fleshing out the paragraphs (or in many cases, solitary sentences), adding the taxobox that needs to be added to almost every page, or work on the redirects. All of the dinosaurs pages, excluding two or three, need to have the main article under the genus, not the species. Or you could help categorize. Currently, many articles are still missing the categories that we determined would be needed for every dino article: when (T/J/K) it lived, and what (eg, Theropod) it was. I've only finished letter A, and the rest of the alphabet is left. That's just a brief list of the things that we've been trying to work on. Your additions, whatever you decide to do, will be a huge help. Thanks again,--Firsfron 02:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being thoughrough Firsfron, I welcomed him above... I've created a list of 20 dinosaurs, as you'll see on the project page. I've added a comment there & on the project page. These should be the project's main concern & should not be removed until the get featured (as I state on the note). I've actually completed putting the {WikiProject Dinosaurs} tag on the letters :x, z, u, w, v, y, & q. I also started on the main dinosaurs & on a. Firsfron is right in saying that all articles should be equal in our efforts, but you are right in a way too. How is the project to be taken seriously if the top twenty dinosaurs aren't even up to featured status? Spawn Man 09:36, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Longest Dinosaur was Seismosaurus

Hello,

Please look into the facts before recorrecting what others have done. Supersaurus, which quite possibly might simply be a very long Diplodocus, is not the longest dinosaur on record. That record goes to Seismosaurus: www.dinosauricon.com, www.dinodata.net

Carlos

Image Tagging Image:Jackson walsh.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jackson walsh.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 11:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dinosaurs

Hi Killdevil!

There's currently less than 100 dinosaurs left on the Missing dinosaur page. We've come a long way! I was thinking that since there's just under 100 dinosaurs left, and since there are 25 of us signed on for the project, if we each wrote about four articles, we'd be done! Well, not "done", obviously, as many of the articles are in need of expansion. But then we could focus on expansion and other things.

You could take, say, Pekinosaurus, Pellegrinisaurus, Penelopognathus, and Phuwiangosaurus.

It's just an idea, of course, and you're of course not obligated and can do whatever you like; I just figured I'd mention the idea, and see if you were interested. No harm, right?

Take care, --Firsfron 06:53, 23 April 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Dinosaur edit

It's just a regular (albeit scholarly) compound noun, like "blueberry". --MarkSweep (call me collect) 07:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HQITW is back!

Hi! I'm just reminding everyone about my quiz section, the Hardest Questions In The World Section. Although many players are already taking part, the more people playing, the more exciting it becomes. Drop by the following link to play... See this link to take part in the competition! Thanks, Spawn Man 01:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dino's epistemlogy

Hi! Just to explain my position. For instance, you surely will say smth like "I believe in the Bible", since "believe" is the right word here, in such a context. But, would you say "I believe in the Pithagora's theorem"?. I don't think so. You would say smth like "The Pithagora's theorem is right, on the basis of the given proofs".

Now, i do not insist that my change was the best possible one, but writing "Scientist believe that..." is simply not an honest way to present the scientists view. Of course, and you're right: we are not arguing here that such "scientific thruth" will never change, and maybe that one day the science will meet the religious positions. But simply a science position is not an argument of "believing". Ciao, and forgive my poor english. --Picone 15:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Killdevil! thanks a lot for "your solution" to this small point: indeed, I think that now the point is made very clear for the reader. talk to you next time, --Picone 21:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Eohippus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eohippus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-recording Dinosaur article

Hi Killdevil!

Thanks for suggesting a new recording. I've just been thinking about returning to some of those recordings I did last year. Now I have a little more time, I'll get onto it. Best Mrdallaway 09:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah right. 18 months later ... Just been looking at the new improved dino article. Now I'm getting tempted, inexplicably. I only have brief interludes of time for recording, but I'll get started right away. It's mainly the pronunciation checking that takes the time. I'll keep ya posted. Have an excellent day. Mrdallaway (talk) 13:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Dinosaur' article

I think we've got somewhere near it now - do you? Well done and cheers - Ballista 22:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page spamming for AfD

Your talk page spamming the AfD for the dinosaur article is inappropriate. Please stop now.--Kchase T 04:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I wasn't aware that leaving messages on talk pages re: an AfD wasn't allowable. Could you clarify what, if any, activities ARE appropriate in support of a particular position on an AFD? I mostly stick to article edits, and must confess that I'm not especially aware of the nuances of this sort of Wikipedia politicking. Thanks, Killdevil 04:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hate it when anyone says "just trust me", but unfortunately I can't find something more explicit than what's at Wikipedia:Spam#Canvassing. In any case, lots of talk page messages to attempt to get people to "vote" one way or another distorts the normal Wikipedia process of gaining consensus, which isn't a process of campaigning and voting, but of those who notice a discussion (perhaps by the AFD notice on the page) going to take part in it. I'll see if I can find a more satisfying process or policy page. In any event, I'm not angry. I understand you weren't aware of the process. I just wanted to get you to stop, and you've done that. Thanks. As you've now noticed my talk page message, you can just reply here.--Kchase T 04:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to step out for a minute. I'll get back to you later with more details. Thanks, again.--Kchase T 04:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the best guide I can find is at Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Abuse_of_deletion_process. That's more about meatpuppets (people who register an account just to "vote" to keep or delete an article they read about on a website somewhere else. Anyway, now you'll know for next time.--Kchase T 05:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. Cheers, Killdevil 05:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.--Kchase T 05:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Religious perspectives on dinosaurs

What a fascinating page - content need a lot of work though. Hope to add material soon. SmithBlue 15:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that apparently misplaced effort on other articles as well - Serbophobia is the best example. Spose it is so much more excitingfighting for something without even having to actually do any editing at all. i'm also thinking that a single religions views are going to change over time. SmithBlue 23:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Killdevil - your creation Religious perspectives on dinosaurs-(Rpod)is slowly growing. There is one editor who feels that "Religious perspectives on dinosaurs" do not exist as "most Christian believe in Science and Evolution". I have tried discussing the posssibility of documenting the beliefs of people but do not seem able to get through. If you feel some curiosity about whats happening over there at Rpod please drop in - and maybe your Dinosaur background might impress the editor mentioned above enough for them to listen to you. He today mentioned a RfD (request for deletion) - if that happened you know where all the religious people are going to end up, dont you.(Please read this as humour, not a threat from me - I will do all I can to keep Rpod going)

License tagging for Image:Saurier2 modified.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Saurier2 modified.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Request

The user you recently warned vandalized another article also after your warning if you check at [[1]]. Can you give whatever action you deem necessary? Thanks. LuciferMorgan 01:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your 7 March 2007 deletion edit to Template:WikiWorld

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from an article. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 00:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Copied over from User talk:SMcCandlish to keep the thread together:]

I'm not really sure what you're referring to in the message you left on my talk page. I'm not new to Wikipedia -- I've been a constructive editor and community member here since sometime in 2005, and I don't run around deleting things willy-nilly... Can you clarify? Killdevil 01:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Double-checking to make sure I'm not in error. Yep here it is - you deleted all of the documentation from this template. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 07:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. You're right. That template was added to article talk on the Dinosaur page, which I help maintain. I was archiving discussions on that talk page, and I suppose I must have clicked through to the template page somehow. Killdevil 00:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur

Hello Killdevil,

The difference between "one group" and "one significant" is subtle I admit but it saying "significant" implies nothing about "insignificant" groups. Did some of those survive? Obviously not.

I'll admit my palaeontological background is a PhD ammonites not dinosaurs, but if a single lineage of ammonite survived, I would write "Only a single group (or clade) of ammonites survived the K/T boundary" or works to that effect. Saying "significant" is non-scientific: how do you measure it? Hominidae are insignificant in terms of taxonomic diversity, but significant in other ways. What makes Aves more significant than any other dinosaur clades?

I'm sure style comes into use of colon versus semi-colon. My feeling is that the one fragment in the sentence in question follows directly from the other, rather than resides as a follow-up point.

Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 16:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit looks fine to me. Thanks! Neale Neale Monks 22:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Kv 44.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MECU≈talk 17:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mrwhitney.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mrwhitney.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 12:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Felizmanz allegorical.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Felizmanz allegorical.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:I screenimage 30579.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:I screenimage 30579.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 23:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Eryops.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eryops.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request you are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. 7 07:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Killdevil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Killdevil. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Killdevil. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pleisiosaur anning.gif

The file File:Pleisiosaur anning.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stegosaurus hall of dinos.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stegosaurus hall of dinos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]