User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive33

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Park w Piławie Dolnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kościół Jana Chrzciciela w Mościsku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kościół zielonoświątkowy św. Antoniego w Świdnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Dzierżoniów, zespół tkalni, ul. Kilińskiego 14 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot, see note --Poco a poco 07:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)@Poco a poco: ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 08:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Dzierżoniów, zespół tkalni, ul. Kilińskiego 14 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you add a more specific category (windows...)? --Poco a poco 07:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)@Poco a poco: ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 08:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Budowlana 2 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality but should be better categorized (what and where) --Trougnouf 07:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)@Trougnouf: ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 17:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, thank you --Trougnouf 20:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, walking people don't disturb the composition --Michielverbeek 07:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Budowlana 2 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 2 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 3 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 3 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kapliczka w Opoczce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 7 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 8 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 8 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 7 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 9 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 10 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kapliczka w Lutomii Dolnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 10 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Michielverbeek 08:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 15 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 6 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good, but please add at least a category about buildings or about the market place, just the town name isn't enough --Poco a poco 08:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)@Poco a poco: ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 14:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 6 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good, but please add at least a category about doors or gates,, just the town name isn't enough --Poco a poco 08:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)@Poco a poco: ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 14:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 16 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 7 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 2 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kościół zielonoświątkowy św. Antoniego w Świdnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 20 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 20 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Łukowa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Łukowa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Świętokrzyska 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Jana Nepomucena w Piskorzowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Jana Nepomucena w Piskorzowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 25 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 25 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 26 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality - distracting surrounding --Virtual-Pano 09:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 27 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Van Maele - La Grande Danse macabre des vifs - 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.110.119.250 20:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 27 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 8 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 30 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 30 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 31 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 32 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 33 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 7 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good, but please add at least a category about buildings or about the market place, just the town name isn't enough --Poco a poco 08:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)✓ Done@Poco a poco: --Jacek Halicki 06:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qi Categorization issues

[edit]

Hi Jacek Halicki/Archive33, you recently got lots of new quality images, frequently for photographs of buildings from the market place in Świdnica. Unfortunately, I must decide which type of architecture is shown here when I categorize quality images on the page Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted. I can qualify architecture as public buildings or residential buildings or as "other". At the moment I stick to "other", because these are probably buildings with mixed purposes, shops in the basement, offices or apartments in the upper floors. So if that should be done differently, then please specify which type of architecture is shown or please change my entries. Lots of thanks from --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 33 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 33 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 34 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 35 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 15 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 35 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A few dust spots on the sky. Otherwise good quality --Jakubhal 08:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)@Jakubhal: Fixed--Jacek Halicki 16:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Grodzka 1 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Grodzka 1 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)@Jakubhal: Fixed--Jacek Halicki 15:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Świdnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 41 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
You need to fix left down corner. Otherwise good quality. --Jakubhal 08:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Good quality (once issue correctly identified by Jakubhal resolved). --Scotch Mist 08:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet, fix first --Jakubhal 08:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok, QI now. --Jakubhal 05:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Świdnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Krzywa Wieża w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 26 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 27 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Stitching errors (just kidding) --Moroder 12:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 16 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Would crop more on the relief --MB-one 18:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)@MB-one: ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 15:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 29 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 29 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Ratusz w Ząbkowicach Śląskich (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Fischer.H 18:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Fryderyk Chopin w 1847 roku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kirtap (talk) 22:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Jacek Halicki,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Cukierki pańska skórka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 E-papieros Wismec R80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

[edit]
  * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Jacek Halicki! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Florian Ceynowa.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Florian Ceynowa.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 20:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021 Starostwo Powiatowe w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Pasztety domowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 22:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kaplica na Cierniaku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 02:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kaplica na Cierniaku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:43, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Kaplica na Cierniaku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:43, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2021

[edit]

Drogi Wikimedianinie,

piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!

Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem wikimedia.pl/zabytki/. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września.

Pozdrawiam, Jamnik z Tarnowa Speak? 15:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30

[edit]
Автор фото Aeou, інфографіка AnastasiaPetrova (WMUA), CC BY-SA 4.0
Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика
Регіон К-ть пам'яток К-ть фото
Севастополь 1 1
АР Крим 12 51
Закарпаття 26 96
Миколаївщина 29 81
Рівненщина 36 186
Херсонщина 36 83
Житомирщина 55 324
Донеччина 57 153
Тернопільщина 62 234
Буковина 75 220
Луганщина 82 90
Львівщина 82 351
Кіровоградщина 88 181
Волинь 98 270
Одещина 115 383
Сумщина 129 414
Дніпропетровщина 139 278
Київ 159 248
Хмельниччина 166 538
Полтавщина 171 863
Харківщина 175 625
Київщина 181 651
Черкащина 186 455
Прикарпаття 240 305
Вінничина 242 775
Запоріжжя 253 317
Чернігівщина 305 519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sathya Sai Ratnakaram.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

1989 (talk) 22:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday!

[edit]

Wszystkiego najlepszego z okazji urodzin! Niech się spełnią wszystkie Twoje marzenia! Życzę twórczego sukcesu!
Happy birthday! May all your dreams come true! I wish you creative success!
--George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

[edit]
  * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Jacek Halicki! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:2017 Smog nad Nową Rudą.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 10.JPG, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:2014 Kłodzko, starówka 12.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Pyramide Abidjan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2022 Krzyż Pielgrzyma do Ziemi Świętej (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2022 Krzyż Pielgrzyma do Ziemi Świętej (avers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2022 Modrzew europejski w Górach Bystrzyckich, w Sudetach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2022 Modrzew europejski w Górach Bystrzyckich, w Sudetach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marie Curie c1920.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FMSky (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Psycho 1960 Lobby Card.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sété40 (talk) 04:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Michał Barczak.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

[edit]
  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Jacek Halicki! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)   [reply]

Wesołych Świąt, Jacek!

[edit]
  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!

   -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Andrzej-trautman-2010.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Andrzej-trautman-2010.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ciasteczka Oreo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Mysz komputerowa Logitech G903 Lightspeed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Corrected by"

[edit]

I am certain I never asked you to overwrite File:Fremont Fair 2009 pre-parade 28.jpg, and in general one is not supposed to overwrite contributions by still-active participants in Commons without their consent. I didn't object, but I'm very unhappy with a bot (I presume at your behest) coming back a decade later and adding a category saying you "corrected" my image, as if there was something "incorrect" about my own work. Assuming that was at your behest (and actually do "correct" me if I'm wrong about that), I am therefore asking you never again to overwrite another image of mine. - Jmabel ! talk 01:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tabliczka klasycznej czekolady Milka.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative copyvio as non-textual artwork clearly visible and a prominent and central aspect of image.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

Ubcule (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Obiektyw AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f 3.5-5.6G ED VR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Obiektyw AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 85mm f 3.5G ED VR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nikon bagnet F.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Wkrętak elektryczny Xiaomi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Porst Reflex CX6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Magne-B6 Max (suplement diety).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Gold-Vit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Cavinton Forte 10 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Diohespan max 1000 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 13:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Duspatalin retard 200 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ibuvit D3 4000 IU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Loperamid 2 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Gin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kosmetyki Ziaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Logo Ziaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Buty Nike Air Jordan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Elektroniczny termometr lekarski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ranlosin 0,4 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ketonal 50 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Doreta 75 mg 650 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Rennie Antacidum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 20:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nifuroksazyd Hasco 100 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 20:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:2023 Valbon Camembert klasyczny.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Valbon Camembert klasyczny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Alkohole.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Alkohole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Nalewki.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nalewki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Could you identify the liqueurs by name in the file description? This could be a good VI if we have clear descriptions. -- Ikan Kekek 20:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:2023 Rumy.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Rumy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Gin.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Gin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Każdy kłos dla wroga cios.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Zegarek Citizen CTZ-9104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentThe image need to be rotated CW. And there are to many dust fiber very visible on the watch dark surface. --Mister rf 09:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Towarzystwa Tatrzańskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Młodzieżowa Odznaka Sprawności Obronnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka PPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The square in the center requires that the image to be rotated CCW. Also, try to remove in post processing the few points of dust that are highlighted on the red background. --Mister rf 08:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)@Mister rf: ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 08:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Nice work --Mister rf 08:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Aerometr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kaseta VHS (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kaseta VHS (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kaseta magnetofonowa i mikrokaseta (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Maszynka do strzyżenia Enchen Boost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Philips OneBlade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Huawei P30 Pro na statywie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Logo polskiej Wikipedii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kaseta magnetofonowa i mikrokaseta (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kasetka z lekami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kombinerki (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Magne B6 Forte (lek OTC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kaseta VHS, magnetofonowa i mikrokaseta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- 05:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Alkoholomierz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nicely lit with good res. -- 05:07, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kombinerki (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Rtęciowy termometr lekarski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Aparat fotograficzny Smiena 8M.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Aparat kompaktowy Wizen MD-90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Trymer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal za Długoletnie Pożycie Małżeńskie (awers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal za Długoletnie Pożycie Małżeńskie (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal za Długoletnie Pożycie Małżeńskie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Golarka Philips.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Mister rf 08:17, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Różaniec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kastet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nikon Coolpix B500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Mister rf 08:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kamkorder Samsung VP-M50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Mister rf 08:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Lornetka teatralna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Dyktafon Olympus VN-541PC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal 40-lecia Polski Ludowej (awers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal 40-lecia Polski Ludowej (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Klamerki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Stereoskop z przeźroczami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal 40-lecia Polski Ludowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal za Zasługi dla Miasta Kłodzka (awers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal za Zasługi dla Miasta Kłodzka (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ryba ze szkła.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Chłodzenie procesora be quiet! Dark Rock Top Flow (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Żeton z Casino de Monte-Carlo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal za Zasługi dla Miasta Kłodzka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Chłodzenie procesora be quiet! Dark Rock Top Flow (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Pamięci Corsair Vengeance RGB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Wentylator be quiet! Silent Wings 135 mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Intel Core i7 12700KF (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka przewodnika sudeckiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka „Za zasługi dla transportu PRL” (awers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka „Za zasługi dla transportu PRL” (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka „Za zasługi dla transportu PRL”.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Intel Core i7 12700KF (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Intel Core i7 12700KF (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Intel Core i7 12700KF (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Chłodzenie procesora be quiet! Dark Rock Top Flow (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Złącze zasilania ATX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ramka do slotu LGA 1700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Złącza wejścia-wyjścia płyty głównej PC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Zasłużony dla Lublina (srebrna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Zasłużony dla Lublina (złota).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Podstawka LGA 1700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentThis is a difficult subject to approach, in terms of the level of detail and the necessary light. However, allow me to comment that I would prefer focusing the socket pins and a double resolution, as the camera allows it. --Mister rf 09:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Płyta główna Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Bibelot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Wzorowy Uczeń.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Popularna GOT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Przodownik Pracy Socjalistycznej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Wzorowy Kierowca (brązowa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Złoty Krzyż Zasługi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Jacek Halicki 07:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kotlety mielone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Jacek Halicki 07:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Krzyż Kawalerski Orderu Odrodzenia Polski (awers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Jacek Halicki 07:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Krzyż Kawalerski Orderu Odrodzenia Polski (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Jacek Halicki 07:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Krzyż Kawalerski Orderu Odrodzenia Polski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Jacek Halicki 07:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Willi Holdorf 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Wzorowy Kierowca (srebrna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Wzorowy Kierowca (złota).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Srebrna odznaka „Za zasługi w dziedzinie geodezji i kartografii”.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Wzorowy Kierowca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Wzorowy Podchorąży.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka honorowego dawcy krwi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Akademicki Klub Turystyczny Wrocław.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Złota odznaka „Za zasługi w dziedzinie geodezji i kartografii”.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Srebrna odznaka „Za zasługi w dziedzinie geodezji i kartografii”.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ołowiany żołnierzyk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Mała brązowa GOT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Chłodzenie procesora Jonsbo CR-1100 ARGB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ceramika bolesławiecka (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ceramika bolesławiecka (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ceramika bolesławiecka (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal Komisji Edukacji Narodowej (awers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal Komisji Edukacji Narodowej (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Sfigmomanometr PMT SOHO 360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Mała złota GOT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment technically a good image. But it's unclear how {{PD-Polish}} is applicable to either the depicted object or the photograph itself. Could you please clarify? --MB-one 14:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)@MB-one: Fixed It's my mistake --Jacek Halicki 22:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Medal Komisji Edukacji Narodowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Mobilny dekoder M-T 5000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nikon Coolpix S6300 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Światłomierz Sverdlovsk-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Panasonic Lumix DMC-L32 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Panasonic Lumix DMC-L32 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nawóz do kwiatów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Żelazko turystyczne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Żelazko turystyczne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kartridże do drukarki HP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Przodujący kolejarz (srebrna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Przodujący kolejarz (złota).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Przodujący kolejarz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Powerbank Anker Powercore 5000mAh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Karol I Habsburg 1917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Przodujący kolejarz (srebrna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Przodujący kolejarz (złota).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Przodujący kolejarz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Powerbank Anker Powercore 5000mAh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Chłodzenie procesora Endorfy Fera 5 ARGB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Za aktywną Pracę PCK XV lat PRL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Noże z węglika wolframu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Ostrzałka Any Sharp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Krzyż Jubileuszowy Wojskowy (awers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Krzyż Jubileuszowy Wojskowy (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Krzyż Jubileuszowy Wojskowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Znaczek Disce Puer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 02:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 TP-Link Archer T5E AC1200 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 02:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 TP-Link Archer T5E AC1200 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 TP-Link Archer T5E AC1200 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Intel Core i7 8700 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Intel Core i7 8700 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Intel Core i7 8700 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Dom nr 36 w Ponikwie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nikon Coolpix S6300 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Panasonic Lumix DMC-L32 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kolorymetr Datacolor Spyder 5 Pro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kolorymetr Datacolor Spyder 5 Pro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kolorymetr Datacolor Spyder 5 Pro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Xiaomi Mi Portable Air Compressor 1S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Zwijana taśma miernicza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Zwijana taśma miernicza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Metr krawiecki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Agrafki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Rozszywacz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Rozszywacz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Woda perfumowana Chopin op.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Zegarek Perfect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 TP-Link Archer T5E AC1200 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Mydło w płynie Carex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Alkohol izopropylowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Tribiotic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Przylepiec Viscoplast Polopor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Obcinacze do paznokci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Tribiotic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Miedziane sprężynki pryzmatyczne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Stalowe sprężynki pryzmatyczne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Opaski Hartmann Pütterbinde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Zszywki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Opaski rzepowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Kleje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Dusza od żelazka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Dezodoranty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Dezodoranty Nivea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Dezodoranty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Tran Mollers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Liquidy do e-papierosów.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Liquidy do e-papierosów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Shoty nikotynowe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Shoty nikotynowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Iglaki diamentowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Mandarynki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Olej lniany LenVitol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Grafos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Dalmierz laserowy Bosh GLM 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Proca neurobalistyczna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Oliwa z oliwek Salvadori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vasmar1 | Marius Vassnes (talk) 08:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Suwak logarytmiczny (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Suwak logarytmiczny (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Minutnik Baseus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Endorfy Fluctus 120 PWM ARGB (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Endorfy Fluctus 120 PWM ARGB (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:2023 Oliwa z oliwek Salvadori.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Oliwa z oliwek Salvadori.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Szampon przeciwłupieżowy Ziaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nikon D90 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nikon D90 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nikon D90 w trybie Live View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Jelcz 043 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Jelcz 043 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Szczypce zaciskowe Morse'a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Powerbank Green Cell PowerPlay 20 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Powerbank Green Cell PowerPlay 20 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Budzik Elektronika 12-41A (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Budzik Elektronika 12-41A (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Budzik Elektronika 12-41A (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Mobilny dekoder M-T 5000 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Adidas Yeezy Boost 350 V2 MX Rock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Elektroniczna waga kuchenna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Szczoteczka do zębów Oral-B Pro 750 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Corsair LL120 RGB (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Corsair LL120 RGB (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Słuchawki JBL TL0846 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Słuchawki JBL TL0846 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Słuchawki JBL TL0846 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Rum Božkov Tradiční (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Im Fokus 01:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Budzik Perfect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect image --Im Fokus 01:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Termometr kuchenny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Im Fokus 01:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Lomography ActionSampler (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Im Fokus 01:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Lomography ActionSampler (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Im Fokus 01:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Rumy Božkov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Jupiter-9 85mm f2 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Jupiter-9 85mm f2 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 03:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Jupiter-9 85mm f2 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 03:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Jupiter-9 85mm f2 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Jupiter-9 85mm f2 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Jupiter-9 85mm f2 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Woda toaletowa Paco Rabanne 1 Million.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Oliwa z oliwek Redoro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Oliwa z oliwek Redoro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice work --Mister rf 00:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Słuchawki Sony WI-XB400 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Słuchawki Sony WI-XB400 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Słuchawki Sony WI-XB400 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Okulary korekcyjne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice work --Mister rf 00:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Powerbank Green Cell PowerPlay 20 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Modern primat 13:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Lokówka (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Lokówka (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Okulary korekcyjne w etui.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Premixy Vitrus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Premixy Vitrus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

File:2023 Premixy, aromaty, lquidy i shoty nikotynowe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Premixy, aromaty, lquidy i shoty nikotynowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Wkrętarka akumulatorowa Xiaomi Mi (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Wkrętarka akumulatorowa Xiaomi Mi (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Wkrętarka akumulatorowa Xiaomi Mi (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Wkrętak z bitami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nitownica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]