Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/08/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234045074).jpg){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_(NY)_April_2016_(26234895443).jpg){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234044744).jpg){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26772043161).jpg){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234895383).jpg){kind=link}
_-_Andy_Warhol_(1928-1987)_(44315585155).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Star_System_3.png_and_File:Diagram_of_the_(fictional)_planetary_system_of_Cardassia_from_the_American_SiFi_series_Star_Trek.png){kind=link}
Duplicate image of Granite boulders and Surveyors Creek.jpg Gderrin (talk) 02:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7: Original author requested deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. —RP88 (talk) 02:06, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
better quality image of same file here: File:Archives nationales d’outre-mer - Louisiane - Adrien de Pauger - 1724 - 001.jpg (minor difference is this file is slightly cropped, but not significantly); this version not currently used on any pages Tcr25 (talk) 14:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Well spotted. Deleted, and redirected to better quality file. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Licensed as {{PD-textlogo}}, but the design of the ball is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. ✗plicit 00:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, over TOO, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim. Likely too complex for COM:TOO US, as the variant example for Car Credit City's non-free logo with an extra border is more simple than this. ✗plicit 01:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Bogus license claim, dubious TOO, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cryptic-waveform as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author info is wrong: The author is also the subject of the photograph. Therefore the license used is wrong. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Reverse image search shows it to be a US press photo by Benjamin E. 'Gene' Forte [1]. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong image and copyright rules. Arenasky (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:55, 14 August 2021 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 14:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Suspected copyright violation. Google quickly finds it is for Doctor Who (1976), so this actor cannot possibly be photoed in 2021. Lembit Staan (talk) 02:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Nonsense/trolling Dronebogus (talk) 05:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Collage of unsourced photos, nonsense description. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio : https://biographyweekly.blogspot.com/2021/08/shahjahan-shamim-wiki-bio-age-height.html Supertoff (talk) 08:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 08:55, 14 August 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 14:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Бессмыслица, Размыто ArthurKarimullin13 (talk) 06:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request as usual by Android app users. --Achim (talk) 18:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio : https://biographyweekly.blogspot.com/2021/08/shahjahan-shamim-wiki-bio-age-height.html Supertoff (talk) 08:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC) Thanks for giving me a reason, I request this blog site to delete these photos and they accept request can you please restore back this image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anny1190 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, all previously published images must have evidence of free license. Here OTRS-permission is needed. After receiving and accepting the permission the file will be restored. Taivo (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio : https://biographyweekly.blogspot.com/2021/08/shahjahan-shamim-wiki-bio-age-height.html Supertoff (talk) 08:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC) Ya he is same person, so his photo can use everywhere I think — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anny1190 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- First, it can't be your own work because you got it from this page. Secondly, see the bottom of the page : 2014 copyright Supertoff (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
No actually that blog article was written by me. Thanks for giving me a reason, I request this blog site to delete these photos and they accept request can you please restore back this image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anny1190 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, all previously published images must have evidence of free license. Here OTRS-permission is needed. After receiving and accepting the permission the file will be restored. Taivo (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип ArthurKarimullin13 (talk) 18:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- was bitte ist hier ein Logo? -- Ra Boe watt?? 18:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense by another Android app user testing the buttons. --Achim (talk) 18:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 16:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep potentially useful picture of a modern lorry driver's seat. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:04, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Kept Vandalisme - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, no clear reason to delete. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept Vandalism - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep, no valid reason to delete. Possible disruptive nomination. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:11, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept vandalisme - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, no valid reason to delete. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Kept - Vandalism - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep no valid reason to delete. Possible disruptive nomination. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Kept vandalism - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso, Sfocato Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep in use illustrating a football team's strip. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Kept - Vandalism - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:55, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Vandalism - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Kept - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Artwork by living artist (Julien Vignikin, born 1966) Culex (talk) 14:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS validation needed. — Racconish 💬 11:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Artwork by living artist (Julien Vignikin, born 1966) Culex (talk) 14:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS validation needed. — Racconish 💬 11:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Artwork by living artist (Julien Vignikin, born 1966) Culex (talk) 14:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS validation needed. — Racconish 💬 11:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Artwork by living artist (Julien Vignikin, born 1966) Culex (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS validation needed. — Racconish 💬 11:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Artwork by living artist (Julien Vignikin, born 1966) Culex (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS validation needed. — Racconish 💬 11:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Germany for Public Interiors. Contributers2020Talk to me here 09:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Category:Interiors of churches in Germany, Category:Interiors of churches in Switzerland ...? --DALIBRI (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- @DALIBRI: Interiors of churches in Germany has been nominated for deletion. Interiors of churches in Switzerland can be left on benefit of doubt as there is a ? on FOP page.
--Contributers2020Talk to me here 04:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No indication that it's recent enough for this to be an issue. Andy Dingley (talk)
07:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Why do you hate me, Andy Dingley. Have you ever, literally ever know about FOP. When there is no proof of the build date, FOP doesn't permit, why the heck do you ever want to keep this. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- This isn't about you. Also, what a strange thing to say over just one comment. Have we met before? What was your account called then? Andy Dingley (talk) 08:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Why do you hate me, Andy Dingley. Have you ever, literally ever know about FOP. When there is no proof of the build date, FOP doesn't permit, why the heck do you ever want to keep this. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason for deletion. If my quick research is correct the interiors of the church are 500 years old. -- Discostu (talk) 11:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the nomination appears to be spurious, but this looks like an official mugshot and it has previously been published elsewhere.[2][3][4] Verbcatcher (talk) 00:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип RaasGil (talk) 06:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyright violation. Flix11 (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. −ebrahimtalk 13:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Copy Violation Not Own Work. Copyrighted see exif data Skivsamlare (talk) 01:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- No need for any longer discussion here, I have added a speedy delete request (see photo page). Riggwelter (talk) 01:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Flickr laundring. First uploaded there, and then here on the same day. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 08:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Ложные данные об авторстве: https://0.soompi.io/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/09081121/stray-kids-hyunjin1.jpeg -- Tomasina (talk) 10:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete clear copyright violation. 'All rights reserved' at the bottom left of the image. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)- Also, on a web page that is dated before the upload here.[5] Verbcatcher (talk) 04:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Golnazdiba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement, unsourced images. GeorgHH • talk 16:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
demande de l'auteur. Nemo Le Poisson (talk) 16:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, not nominated by the uploader, but the original image has been overwritten by the original uploader with text that appears to request deletion. The original image claimed to be a YouTube channel logo and the uploader had named a different author, so there is a significant risk of copyright violation. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Racconish. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE uploads by a cross-wiki sockpuppeteer.
- File:Commons User Comflexi in summer 2010.png
- File:Commons User Comflexi in summer 2013.png
- File:Pene con prepuzio.jpg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal selfie, Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom. No realistic educational purpose, especially when there are similar higher-quality photos on Commons (this one is slightly blurry, and the borders on the side make me assume it's either a screenshot or taken on a phone). - Whisperjanes (talk) 15:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alireza Nikkhah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alireza Nikkhah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:نمونه ای از استخری که ساخته شده.jpg
- File:Tube Unique Wilderness.jpg
- File:دکتر محسن شکوه.jpg
- File:خینکالی.jpg
- File:رودخانهٔ کورا.jpg
- File:نمای داخلی خانه سیمسون ها.jpg
- File:کتیبه سنگی.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 08:39, 22 August 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:59, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Google finds it here https://polisee.co.za/meet-founder-and-executive-director/ but the site is down. No exif, PCP Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 23:33, 22 August 2021 UTC: No permission since 14 August 2021 --Krdbot 07:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
كانت تجربة أولى لرفع الصور على الموقع Shafif520 (talk) 01:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. --Alaa :)..! 11:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - seems to have been used on self-created article on da.wiki Askeuhd (talk) 14:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, permissions unclear Askeuhd (talk) 14:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 15:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work claim; promotional poster for a musical, almost certainly copyrighted, needs VPT evidence. Sennecaster (talk) 03:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
есть леучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
есть леучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 06:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
No meaningful exif, one has "Taken by team photographer" while another has "Picture taken by RDC staff", all unlikely to be own work
- File:Grace Tanda celebrating a goal with teammates in Motala AIF FK.jpg
- File:Grace Tanda in Thanh Hoa FC .jpg
- File:Grace Tanda Gefle IF.jpg
- File:Grace Tanda Östersund FK.jpg
- File:Grace Tanda Team picture with the Congo U22.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused selfie. Out of scope. Yahya (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete, the background image is available on PixaBay with what appears to be an acceptable license,[6] but this source should be properly declared and the image should not be declared as 'own work'. The text may be non-free. There is Facebook metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment: the photo of the flowers is available on Pixabay with what appears to be a free license.[7] The source should be accurately declared. The text may be non-free. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: the artwork of the hands is available with a free license,[8] although its source should be declared. The text may be non-free. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:55, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete most other uploads by this uploader include background images that are not correctly attributed and may be copyright violations. I have not found a matching image to this online. The text may be non-free. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:50, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Also possible copyright violation, combination of quote and photo both of which could be individually copyrightable. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete, the image is available on Pixabay with what appears to be a free license.[9] The source should be declared accurately, and the text may not be free. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:46, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a probable copyright violation. Image is available online.[10] We need evidence of a valid free license. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:42, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, risk of copyright violation. The background image is widely used online.[11][12] We need evidence that it is available with a valid free license. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a possible copyright violation. The background image is widely available online.[13] We need evidence that this is available with a valid free license. Our image has FaceBook metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:33, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a probable copyright violation. TinEye shows many older versions online, including one that was archived before the upload here.[14] Has FaceBook metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a probable copyright violation, the image is widely available online with different text. Also it has Facebook metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose; it is an allegedly self-created artwork, without obvious educational use, amounting to an advert for 'faith' or 'god'. Tagishsimon (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a probable copyright violation, the image is widely available online with different text. Also this has Facebook metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tasvirgaran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Селфи ArthurKarimullin13 (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama for 2D works in the UK Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. The signature on the sign dates it to 2008, so it looks to be an original painting for the sign. De minimis obviously doesn't apply. --bjh21 (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. Multichill (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Metadata says “FBMD”, likely taken from Facebook. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused and suspicious notability logo. Out of COM:SCOPE Netora (talk) 01:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused and suspicious notability logo. Out of COM:SCOPE Netora (talk) 02:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused and suspicious notability logo. Out of COM:SCOPE Netora (talk) 02:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused and suspicious notability logo. Out of COM:SCOPE --Netora (talk) 02:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused and suspicious notability logo. Out of COM:SCOPE Netora (talk) 02:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Drobescu (talk) 05:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no longer qualifies for courtesy deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
No description, no location, no sense, not in project scope. Fl.schmitt (talk) 06:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
No description, no location, no sense, not in project scope. Fl.schmitt (talk) 06:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
No description, no location, no sense, not in project scope. Fl.schmitt (talk) 06:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
No description, no location, no sense, not in project scope. Fl.schmitt (talk) 06:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
as the uploader, i shouldnt have to give a reason SaltySemanticSchmuck (talk) 07:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:07, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Taken from the official website of the school. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
No educational use, out of project scope, using commons as webhoster Fl.schmitt (talk) 08:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of being a free/creative commons image 159.196.171.24 09:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete widely available online. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:42, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of being a free/creative commons image 159.196.171.24 09:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, watermark indicates that this is from AutoEvolution, where there is no free license.[15] Verbcatcher (talk) 04:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bmooney437 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are either copyrighted logos and screenshots, or the uploader is trying to use Commons as a webhost.
- File:BM Logo square.png
- File:Home Page PDF.pdf
- File:Brain Master Mailing List- Nobel Prize Awards.png
- File:Brain Master Website First Article- Nebulae.jpg
- File:Brain Master.jpg
MKFI (talk) 10:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because it is ugly. --Bus Follower (talk) 11:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Image has not been tagged as being listed for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, in use. Valid licenses cannot be withdrawn. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of non-notable women. ManFromNord (talk) 12:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unused user picture; uploader's only contributions was uploading 2 photos of themself in 2015, the other of which was already deleted. Not used. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of non-notable women. ManFromNord (talk) 13:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. 5R-MFT (talk) 13:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, requested by uploader shortly after upload. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Lower quality duplicate of File:Abraham Ortelius-Islandia-ca 1590.jpg Askeuhd (talk) 13:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of File:Ravnkel Frøjsgodes Saga, Kort over Island 1590..PNG Askeuhd (talk) 13:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promoitional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo, which is a possible copyvio given the lack of metadata. Askeuhd (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promotional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, originally uploaded in a self-promotional effort Askeuhd (talk) 14:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ghahramaniali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused "logo", looks to be over TOO, false source/authorship claim, uncategorized since upload in June 2020. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:06, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Apparently I copyvio-declined it last year presumably for the TOO reason - Whilst I do believe the logo is fine in terms of TOO it's unused and sort of meaningless to anyone. Delete. –Davey2010Talk 18:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, this is the logo of a museum in England.[16] It is too complex to come under the threshold of originality in the UK, see COM:TOO UK. Compare with w:en:File:Clerical Medical logo.svg, which was deleted on Commons following Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clerical Medical.png. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:33, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
les photos publiées sur le site de l'Assemblée nationale ne sont pas libre de droit https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/info-site Tiraden (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, no free license at the declared source, where the webpage footer says "©Tous droits réservés Assemblée nationale 2019". Verbcatcher (talk) 01:52, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
photo très probablement non libre de droit d'auteur. Tiraden (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, declared as "Photo de presse" and "Unknown author", too recent to be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I want to delete this image I uploaded in order to change it Dariusdirpes (talk) 19:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete by courtesy. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. This picture can be found many times on Internet (see https://tineye.com/search/dbcbfb6e794e27229d824864210a9ab87b8e26c8?sort=size&order=desc&page=1) Sémhur (talk) 19:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Présente sur le net depuis au moins 5 ans [17] Il existe de plus une signature en filigrane entre les pieds du cheval (zoom) . En outre, montage probable d'une photo que l'on retrouve aussi fréquemment [18] . HB (talk) 11:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Poor traduction : This photo has been on the net for at least five years. There is a signature between the horse's feet (zoom). Furthermore, it is a derivative of another photo that is frequently found HB (talk) 11:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
derivative work issue Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, includes an image of the cover of the March 1971 edition of Playboy magazine. We should assume that the magazine had a copyright notice. Commons:Hirtle chart indicates this is in copyright for 95 years from publication, i.e. until 2067. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Taken from the official website of the school. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Taken from the official website of the school. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. High possibility of copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable snippet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
There are no sources for the images in the collage. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, the lower-left photo has been published before upload here, in a wider crop and attributed to a different photographer.[19][20] Verbcatcher (talk) 01:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I am not happy to have this file uploaded here more. Hossein29394 (talk) 21:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, unless the uploader is withdrawing the claim to be the photographer. Photo is in use, valid licenses cannot be withdrawn. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:11, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. Found elsewhere online credited to "ACAA". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Not in-use picture of an unknown teenager. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 23:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
License laundering by Filtrr
[edit]- File:Андрей Владимирович Антонов (слева), Тревис Баджент (по центру), Джон Брзенк (справа).jpg
- File:Обложка первого музыкального диска "Богатырские песни", автор и исполнитель - Андрей Владимирович Антонов (Ратибор).jpg
- File:Андрей Владимирович Антонов (Ратибор).jpg
- File:Александр Михайлович Грачев (слева), Виктор Николаевич Селуянов (по центру), Андрей Владимирович Антонов (справа).jpg
,_%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%81_%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82_(%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83),_%D0(63%D0%B6%D0%BE%D0%BD_%D0%91%D1%80%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA_(%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80_%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%A1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%83%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2_(%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83),_%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2_(%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Possible license laundering.
- Profile on Flickr is new; all photos are uploaded for new article (ruwiki).
- All photos related with russian person. Name of photographer... John Johonson.
- CD cover, magazine cover...--178.121.28.169 23:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Я решил написать статью о знаменитом спортсмене, связался с ним, попросил фото, в дальнейшем оказалось, что их сложно залить на википедию, я предложил Антонову залить их на flickr и указать необходимые права, это оказалось быстрее и понятнее. Если я совершил большую ошибку, то каюсь. Помогите разобраться, какой алгоритм должен быть, чтобы разместить данные фото с разрешения владельца Антонова? --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Filtrr (talk • contribs)
- Права по умолчанию не принадлежат лицу, изображённому на фото. Правообладатели (фотографы, в случае обложек — обладатель прав на них) должны прислать разрешение. Подписывайтесь, пожалуйста, четырьмя тильдами. Просто в конце сообщения добавляйте четыре тильды (~) подряд. Сайт сам преобразует эту конструкцию в вашу подпись.—178.121.28.169 20:54, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Понял, все сделаю!Filtrr (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Права по умолчанию не принадлежат лицу, изображённому на фото. Правообладатели (фотографы, в случае обложек — обладатель прав на них) должны прислать разрешение. Подписывайтесь, пожалуйста, четырьмя тильдами. Просто в конце сообщения добавляйте четыре тильды (~) подряд. Сайт сам преобразует эту конструкцию в вашу подпись.—178.121.28.169 20:54, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Я решил написать статью о знаменитом спортсмене, связался с ним, попросил фото, в дальнейшем оказалось, что их сложно залить на википедию, я предложил Антонову залить их на flickr и указать необходимые права, это оказалось быстрее и понятнее. Если я совершил большую ошибку, то каюсь. Помогите разобраться, какой алгоритм должен быть, чтобы разместить данные фото с разрешения владельца Антонова? --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Filtrr (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
immeuble récent, les droits d'image appartiennent à l'architecte Tiraden (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
copyvio https://www.ouest-france.fr/pays-de-la-loire/loire-atlantique/nantes-la-suppression-de-lignes-aleop-attise-la-colere-6543801 109.211.9.29 18:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, declared author name does not match uploader's username. Used in a Maltese stamp issued before upload here.[21] published in a news report dated before upload here.[22] Verbcatcher (talk) 18:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work but DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, unclear that the uploader is the photographer. Source is declared as 'Copy of original photo I own', ownership of a physical photograph does not indicate ownership of the image copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, unclear that the uploader was the original photographer. Not old enough to be reliably public domain, subject William F. Lewis was a bishop from 1942 to 1964. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, clearly a photograph of a photograph or of a painting. Unlikely to be public domain as the subject Emanuel Galea died in 1974. Other questionable uploads by this uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
The logo is presented as "their logo", implying it's the official one. The uploader changed it on w:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Sinai Province. However, there is no source present, and the license and authorship data is inconsistent with the logo being official. The only logo I could find sources for is File:Wilayat_Sinai_logo.jpeg. So this file seems to be either out of project scope or with misleading source, authorship and licensing data. MarioGom (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 01miki10 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo of Kuparikiekko Jr ry (https://www.kuparikiekko.com/), definitely not own work. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 23:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Not free I think Geoprofi Lars (talk) 15:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- It's a still of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2021_Taliban_Offensive.png --Aréat (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, this appears to be the first version of File:2021 Taliban Offensive.png, which was uploaded by Rr016. This can be kept if the source is declared correctly and the author is changed to Rr016. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:48, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per Verbcatcher. I have adjusted the authorship and sourcing. Applodion (talk) 08:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I have no problem with people using or modifying my maps. I don't even care if you credit me or not. I make these maps so others have the best information available and history gets preserved. --Rr016 (talk) 12:42, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep First version of map, the one I saw a few weeks ago, I think. @Rr016: And many thanks for your work. Javert2113 (talk) 03:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Suspicious image. Unlikely to be self-photographed image by uploader BoyCovid (talk · contribs). While no exact matches were found in both reverse Google Images search and TinEye, variations of it (cropped ones, part of a collage etc.) have been detected, with dates from 2020 backwards. Certainly published elsewhere prior to the upload here in February 2021. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Marked as own work, yet source is "image from nasa.gov page". Many images from nasa.gov are PD-NASA, but many also are not. Some are from contractors. Impossible to tell without original source link. Leijurv (talk) 00:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- I brought this question up here in June: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Space_Launch_System#Units Leijurv (talk) 00:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Related deletion requests:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:SLF ref 2.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:SpaceX Starship payload.png
- Contradictory sourcing/licensing without specific source provided. Delete Unless problems are promptly fixed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It's a screen shot of a portion of [23], so {{PD-USGov-NASA}}, but it's probably out of COM:SCOPE as raw text that would be better suited as a Wikipedia citation and not an image. clpo13(talk) 19:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:SLS ref 1.png Leijurv (talk) 00:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Related deletion requests:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:SLS ref 1.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:SpaceX Starship payload.png
- Delete Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Cropped from the second page of [24]. Per [25]: "NASA occasionally uses copyright-protected material of third parties with permission on its website. Those images will be marked identified as copyright protected with the name of the copyright holder." There's no indication of a third-party copyright holder, so this is {{PD-USGov-NASA}}. However, it'd probably be of more use to upload the original PDF. clpo13(talk) 19:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:HKHM 沙田 Shatin 香港文化博物館 HK Heritage Museum Hong Kong Pop 60 Exhibition August 2021 SS2 217.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo of a poster in a museum with no actual provenance to determine the original's copyright status King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
The uploader wants to revoke the cc-by-sa-4.0 and change it to a cc-by-nc-sa-4.0 license, which is not permitted. However, the image is of questionable educational value.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio, closed by. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of Charging Bull (no FoP for sculptures in the United States) Filetime (talk) 01:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of Brick House (no FoP for sculptures in the United States) Filetime (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Justlettersandnumbers as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no permission from the claimed photographer, Julian Hargreaves. Flickr user should be contacted to clarify the status of the work, as there is no immediate evidence of Flickrwashing. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (no FoP for sculptures in the United States) Filetime (talk) 01:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, the copyright owner uploaded the image for free use. This is an important image on the Wikipedia page for the monument. Since someone is even thinking of deleting this please upload it onto Wikipedia, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This sculpture was unveiled on August 26, 2020. This was the first sculpture added to Central Park since 1965. No entry was established in the Smithsonian Art Inventories Catalog or the Catalog of the U.S. Copyright Office. According to the Unveiling Ceremony Speech, the sculpture was donated to the City of New York by Monumental Women. There are no restrictions in park ordinances regarding taking and distributing images of Central Park's artwork. In the contrary, it is in the organizer's interest to make this unique monument as public as possible. Therefore, it should be assumed that this sculpture by unveiling it to the public was implicitly assigned to the public domain as all others in the park are. -- Axel (talk) 05:05, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete @Randy Kryn and Axel Tschentscher: These are both woeful misunderstandings of COM:FOP, which explicitly protects copyrighted works of art from derivative works. Photographer Axel Tschentscher is not the relevant copyright owner here; the relevant copyright owner is the sculptor Meredith Bergmann. Almost all public art is "unveiled;" such an act is by NO means a waiver of an artists' right to copyright.
- For artworks, even if permanently installed in public places, the U.S. copyright law has no similar exception, and any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork thus is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork.
- Furthermore a specific copyright registration is only relevant for works installed prior to 1978. There is no question that this sculpture is protected under copyright and thus its derivative works unacceptable for Commons. Filetime (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Fair use applies as the image illustrates an article on the statue. If this is serious please, as I asked, can someone upload this image to Wikipedia to free it from Commons, I'm not proficient at that. This is the main image on the statue's page, and unless the artist, who surely has to know that the statue has a Wikipedia page, complains and asks that the image be removed because...why would she?... just leave it alone. The group Monumental Women paid for the statue, and they too must know that the article exists (and that fair use applies). When did Commons get such an inroad on Wikipedia to be able to deliberately harm the encyclopedic coverage of a major suffrage monument, the only statue of real women in Central Park, and ignore fair use. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- "Deliberately harm the encyclopedic coverage?" you mean respect copyright as clearly defined under U.S. copyright law? This statue could be the most important in the world, and that doesn't change the fact that "Fair use" media files are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Filetime (talk) 18:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Fair use applies as the image illustrates an article on the statue. If this is serious please, as I asked, can someone upload this image to Wikipedia to free it from Commons, I'm not proficient at that. This is the main image on the statue's page, and unless the artist, who surely has to know that the statue has a Wikipedia page, complains and asks that the image be removed because...why would she?... just leave it alone. The group Monumental Women paid for the statue, and they too must know that the article exists (and that fair use applies). When did Commons get such an inroad on Wikipedia to be able to deliberately harm the encyclopedic coverage of a major suffrage monument, the only statue of real women in Central Park, and ignore fair use. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The relevant copyright owner MIGHT BE the sculptor Meredith Bergmann, if she has not transferred her rights as part of the terms of the commission, or otherwise. This is not unlikely - for example the park would probably want to be able to sell postcards without worrying about copyright. In the absence of certainty on this. An upload to Wp, & a fair use justification might be the best route. Johnbod (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete on Commons, and then reupload locally as fair use. We can't just ignore FOP issues if they're inconvenient. However, I think that an image of the copyrighted sculpture would certainly meet the fair use requirements. I don't think this can be kept on Commons as the underlying work (the sculpture) isn't free, but this certainly should be uploaded locally in the various places for fair use. Hog Farm (talk) 18:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - equires a free license from the sculptor or evidence that the sculptor transferred copyright to the city and that the city has freely licensed it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Headshot of "Reclining Liberty," a temporary art installation by artist Zaq Landsberg housed in New York City's Morningside Park.jpg
[edit]
Copyvio of Reclining Liberty (no FoP for sculptures in the United States) Filetime (talk) 01:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (copyrighted sculpture by Elmgreen & Dragset) Filetime (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (copyrighted sculpture by Elmgreen & Dragset) Filetime (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (copyrighted sculpture by Elmgreen & Dragset) Filetime (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (copyrighted sculpture by Elmgreen & Dragset) Filetime (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (copyrighted sculpture by Elmgreen & Dragset) Filetime (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of Doublefoot by Tom Otterness Filetime (talk) 01:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of Doublefoot by Tom Otterness Filetime (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of Doublefoot by Tom Otterness Filetime (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of Doublefoot by Tom Otterness Filetime (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP US, freedom of panorama extends only to buildings in the United States. Copyrighted text on signs is not covered. ✗plicit 01:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of Doublefoot by Tom Otterness Filetime (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:'Sleepwalker' (2014) by Tony Matelli -- The High Line New York (NY) April 2016 (26234045074).jpg
[edit]_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234045074).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234045074).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio of Sleepwalker by Tony Matelli Filetime (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_(NY)_April_2016_(26234895443).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_(NY)_April_2016_(26234895443).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio of Sleepwalker by Tony Matelli Filetime (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:"Sleepwalker" (2014) by Tony Matelli -- High Line Art New York (NY) April 2016 (26873291711).jpg
[edit]_by_Tony_Matelli_--_High_Line_Art_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26873291711).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_High_Line_Art_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26873291711).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio of Sleepwalker by Tony Matelli Filetime (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:'Sleepwalker' (2014) by Tony Matelli -- The High Line New York (NY) April 2016 (26234044744).jpg
[edit]_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234044744).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234044744).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio of Sleepwalker by Tony Matelli Filetime (talk) 01:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:'Sleepwalker' (2014) by Tony Matelli -- The High Line New York (NY) April 2016 (26772043161).jpg
[edit]_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26772043161).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26772043161).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio of Sleepwalker by Tony Matelli Filetime (talk) 01:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:'Sleepwalker' (2014) by Tony Matelli -- The High Line New York (NY) April 2016 (26234895383).jpg
[edit]_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234895383).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Tony_Matelli_--_The_High_Line_New_York_(NY)_April_2016_(26234895383).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio of Sleepwalker by Tony Matelli Filetime (talk) 01:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim. This was locally uploaded in September 2019, but can be found on this Tumblr post from January 2019. As this is a globe, a faithful 2D reproduction is not possible. The person who took these retains the rights of their photos. ✗plicit 01:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 18:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
_-_Andy_Warhol_(1928-1987)_(44315585155).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Andy_Warhol_(1928-1987)_(44315585155).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Work copyrighted (Andy Warhol) in the United States Filetime (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
_-_Andy_Warhol_(1928-1987)_(44315585155).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
_-_Andy_Warhol_(1928-1987)_(44315585155).jpg){kind=link}
This is a Getty Images rights-controlled photo ID #480708160 by Jonathan Leibson. As a work previously published elsewhere with a non-free license, we need permission sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Given the similarity between your user name (i.e. Jonathanleibson) and the photographer's name, you might be thinking "But it's my own work!" It is unfortunately very common for users to upload other people's photographs that they downloaded from the internet with a claim that they are the original photographer, so in these circumstances we ask uploaders to confirm their identity with our volunteers. —RP88 (talk) 01:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
The caption at the source says: "Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada poses for a portrait in this undated and unknown location photo." So, this wasn't taken by VOA, we don't know who took it. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:03, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The copyright holder is AP or another copyright holder (Afghan Islamic Press), but definitely not Voice of America. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 09:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- No, the fact that it happens to have an AP logo on the VOA page does not mean the copyright holder is AP. Reuters states the photo was originally posted on Twitter by the Taliban on 25 May 2016 [26], Washington Post also credits "Afghan Taliban" in the first instance [27]. 82.18.206.157 12:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Correct. Which is why I said we don't know who took it (it was probably the Taliban). In any case, it's not VOA. ― Tartan357 Talk 03:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- If the Taliban were actually the ones who took it, we shouldn't protect anything of theirs anyway. I vote to Keep so that in the event of another war, we know who the guilty parties are. ----DanTD (talk) 20:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- The irony is that the image will most likely be deleted, since it "violates the copyright of the Taliban guys". Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- That's a non-argument if I ever saw one. We don't allow copyright violations just because the copyright holders are people we don't like. ― Tartan357 Talk 01:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Perhaps, I suggest, you should request permission to use image from the current Taliban regime. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- If the Taliban were actually the ones who took it, we shouldn't protect anything of theirs anyway. I vote to
- Correct. Which is why I said we don't know who took it (it was probably the Taliban). In any case, it's not VOA. ― Tartan357 Talk 03:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- No, the fact that it happens to have an AP logo on the VOA page does not mean the copyright holder is AP. Reuters states the photo was originally posted on Twitter by the Taliban on 25 May 2016 [26], Washington Post also credits "Afghan Taliban" in the first instance [27]. 82.18.206.157 12:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Tartan357: @Roman Kubanskiy: @DanTD: Why don't you order the image through OTRS ?, or someone with OTRS experience to make the image public domain.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 15:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete We know nothing about this picture's origins, location, author, let alone its copyright status. The Taliban may not be worthy of having their copyrights protected, but we have no options. --Kuatrero (talk) 03:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyvio. Zoozaz1 (talk) 17:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of this file Epipelagic (talk) 04:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Invalid request - The other file is the duplicate. CFCF (talk) 17:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 17:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип RaasGil (talk) 06:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, trashhold of orgin not reached. --DaB. (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Селфи RaasGil (talk) 06:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of Moon Knight, if that's what's meant by "own work", else collage made by uploader from copyrighted character. 87.49.45.32 07:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Image still within the 50 p.m.a. of Vietnam. No indication of a free license release. Vaishakh1234 (talk) 07:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Now replaced by File:Clausewitz - Théorie de la grande guerre, II - schéma p. 247.svg, a svg instead of a png. Jahl de Vautban (talk) 07:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Replaced by redirect. --DaB. (talk) 17:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
False source, false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 17:26, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Filetime as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright of the late Andy Warhol (or rather his estate)|source= Polarlys (talk) 18:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This should fall under German FOP. --Polarlys (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- But was installed permanently or just for an exhibition? --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, was only a temporary Ausstellung. --DaB. (talk) 17:28, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Beyond threshold of originality; uses an uncommon typeface made of complex geometric arrangements. Webfil (talk) 14:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. The logo is likely to complex to pass whatever threshold of originality is relevant. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 14:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There's zero reason to delete this. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Interesting sign and I see no reason to delete the file in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Sfocato, Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, no clear reason for deletion, part of the team strip of Operário Ferroviário Esporte Clube. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:06, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept per Verbcatcher -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, no valid reason to delete, in use. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:07, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept per Verbcatcher -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
les photos de la présidence de la république françaises ne sont pas dans le domaines publiques (https://www.elysee.fr/informations-legales-editoriales) Tiraden (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Missing COM:EVID of permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
J'ai fait une erreur. Je pensais que ces images étaient libres de droits. Antoineets (talk) 09:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Justified_True_Belief_model_of_knowledge.svg Dominic Mayers (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC) I am not sure how I must make a request for deletion. At some point, I was not able to update the file because the system always complained that the file was corrupted. So, I decided to upload the same file, but in .png format here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Classical_definition_of_Knowledge.png. I think it is useless to keep the .svg version and it is not used anywhere. It is also that the .svg file seems indeed corrupted, because it renders in a weird way. The text change location depending on how much we scale the image. Dominic Mayers (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Note added: I finally succeeded to upload the svg file. It seems that your system did not accept my embedded font. So, I simply deleted the css style that embedded the font and it worked. However, when I do that the text in the image does not render the same after I upload. I guess that I need to use a font that your system has. Dominic Mayers (talk) 02:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Note added: OK, I succeeded to upload a SVG file that renders properly. I had to replace all fonts and the stroke of the arrow by paths. I read that it is a known problem that fonts with a same name can differ among systems. So, for maximum portability we need to embed the fonts, but I did not succeed to do that with Wikipedia—maybe you do not accept embedded fonts. Anyway, I succeeded by replacing them by paths. So, I would actually prefer that we keep the SVG version. It's nicer because it is scalable. Dominic Mayers (talk) 15:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Clearly malformed request. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Not of any informative value, troll post, pornographic 2600:1702:1A80:CB30:E044:60D3:FF89:7953 03:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
COM:PENIS deletion
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Taiwan, New Taiwan Dollars, regareless of banknotes and/or coins, are not free currencies Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:03, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ditto for
- File:TWD1-ROC63b.jpg (both the title one and this are "中華民國六十三年", Minguo 63th is 1974, so both will be PD in Taiwan by 1974 51=2025)
- File:TWD10.JPG ("中華民國七十年", Minguo 70th is 1981, so this will be PD in Taiwan by 1981 51=2032)
- File:TWD1.JPG ("中華民國八十七年", Minguo 87th is 1998, so this will be PD in Taiwan by 1998 51=2049)
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dharmadhyaksha as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Very high res here. Looks like BH doesnt own originals. Also please delete its derivative File:Suman Ranganathan at 60th South Filmfare Awards 2013 (cropped).jpg. This file was speedied in 2013, and it has resurfaced on COM:UNDEL. The crux of the issue is whether Bollywood Hungama is the creator of this image, and a DR is the best way to determine that.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Please also see the prior discussion on File talk:Suman Ranganathan at 60th South Filmfare Awards 2013.jpg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per {{COM:PRP]]. Unclear if Bollywood owns the copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOO Australia, the threshold of originality in Australia is incredibly low. The stylized "7mate" portion is likely too complex by those standards. ✗plicit 00:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyright-violating derivative work: the "e" in the bottom left seems like a leftover of Google's logo, indicating that the map is derived from Google. The photo of the Salwa Palace is also probably made by someone other than the uploader, like the Diriyah Gate Development Authority (second photo). HyperGaruda (talk) 06:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Howhontanozaz as Dw no source since (dw no source since).
Rationale seems to be FOP-related. Flickr tags indicate it is found in Hong Kong, where there is {{FoP-Hong Kong}}, but the portraitures are likely not eligible for Hong Kong freedom of panorama. For one thing these are 2D graphic works. Another thing, these seem to be temporal in nature. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hong Kong have no right of portraiture, and these aren't exactly 2D as these appears to be part of graphical design of 3D pottery objects. C933103 (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot of proprietary software. Matt (talk) 07:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:800px-ArchiCAD-12-NHS-3D.png as well. Due to the missing description, I think this is just a low effort upload taken from elsewhere and not self made. Matt (talk) 07:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
The image is a logo of a organisation and it may be copy righted 2409:4070:2E15:B171:4827:E84A:8B67:EC72 08:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
The file is not a symbol of the Japanese imperial family. The colors are different and the Japanese imperial family is not blue background. The file is identified as a PD file as fake. It is confirmed to be copyrighted. I'd like to request deletion. Gameposo (talk) 12:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
"Source of the photo on the top is unknown". Collage cannot be free licensed with unsourced photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Photo seen at [28], I don't know how to read Chinese, but see a copyright notice at the bottom of the page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
photo issue du site de l'Assemblée nationale (https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/sycomore/fiche/(num_dept)/395), non libre de droits ( https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/info-site) Tiraden (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-France. --Yann (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
le site de l'Assemblée nationale n'est pas libre de droits Tiraden (talk) 17:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-France. --Yann (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso, Sfocato Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, no valid reason to delete, in use. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso, Sfocato Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, no valid reason to delete, in use as part of a football team strip. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Perché sì Senza senso Alessandro Pace (talk) 18:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep, the nominator has not given a valid reason to delete. The subject is an architect and a university academic, and he may be sufficiently noteworthy.[29][30] We should at least give the uploader a few days to use the image in another project. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:23, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
ONLY VERSION 20210814192443 because this is an image uploaded by mistake Darekk2 (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, the nomination appears to request deletion of only one version of the image. To request this see Commons:Revision deletion, but you need to give a valid reason. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- so it is impossible to delete that revision, because it is not PD-Art nor revisions with unknown source, authorship and/or licensing ? But this is image
File:Pradawne i pierwotne lasy bukowe Karpat i innych regionów Europy - mapa.jpg uploaded as
File:Pradawne i pierwotne lasy bukowe Karpat i innych regionów Europy - mapa 2.jpg by mistake. ~~
- so it is impossible to delete that revision, because it is not PD-Art nor revisions with unknown source, authorship and/or licensing ? But this is image
- @Darekk2: I am uncertain what you are asking for. Do you want File:Pradawne i pierwotne lasy bukowe Karpat i innych regionów Europy - mapa 2.jpg to be deleted, including its three earlier versions? This file is in use in Polish Wikipedia in w:pl:Pradawne i pierwotne lasy bukowe Karpat i innych regionów Europy, which you have recently edited. If this file contains misleading information then you should remove it from the Wikipedia article, or discuss it on the article's talk page. Please clarify what should be deleted. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- I want to ONLY VERSION 20210814192443 because this is an image uploaded by mistake ~~
@Darekk2: Całym zdaniem proszę, bo tak jak piszesz, tu już nikt nie wie o co ci chodzi. Tylko wersję 20210814192443 usunąć, a trzy pozostałe zostawić - czy tylko wersję 20210814192443 zostawić, a trzy pozostałe usunąć? --WTM (talk) 20:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- PO-PiSzyzm szaleje. Usunąć tylko wersję 20210814192443, pozostałe zostawić ~~
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Same as File:The Holy Quran.pdf, except for the two tiny watermarks on the first and last page. I propose to redirect File:Arabic-quran-a.pdf to File:The Holy Quran.pdf. HyperGaruda (talk) 08:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Made a redirect. --Ellywa (talk) 16:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Very low quality. We have much better images. Kramer Associates (talk) 22:21, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom - plenty more around and that one is not good/unique Herby talk thyme 13:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Pornographic file, not being used, seems doesn't have much value 116.49.149.67 09:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Commons is not censored. --Achim (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: see COM:Penis. No indication that this is a useful addition to our collection of images in Category:Human penis. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:47, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Probably taken from https://glose.com/author/nilah-magruder, no meaningful exif, think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
It's probably Glose which copy the pic from Commons. A french enterprise founded in 2014 going to Pasadena in 2016 to take a photography (which appears shot by an amateur) of an author not known in France ? I hardly believe it. --Olivier Tanguy (talk) 20:55, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- The author's press kit page online at [31] shows that the photographer is someone who has worked more than once with her. It is highly likely that Michelle Kinne took the photo as a PR shot at the event and uploaded it herself. She has made no other edits but this one.Antiqueight (talk) 12:57, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep Agree with Antiqueight. The person who uploaded it is likely the photographer. So I see zero reason to delete it. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Its more likely that this is a promo photo the uploader found on Insta, based on the metadata. Its always suspicious when a new user uploads a single photo of dubious origin and then never contributes again Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- FWIW uploader claims to be a photographer called Michelle Kinne who has photographed Magruder before. Kinne's photos are (c) see https://www.mkinnephotography.com/ - I think we need OTRS to verify the uploaders claim Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I have no reason to doubt that the uploader made the photo themselves. Therefore the photo can be kept per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. And some are clearly not own work, because uploader is subject of the photo.
- File:Roman Abrate Prize.jpg
- File:Roman Abrate Result.jpg
- File:Roman Abrate Rodeo 540 GoPro.jpg
- File:Roman Abrate Portrait.JPG
- File:Image roman abrate.jpg
- File:Roman Abrate.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep These seem to be of a notable roller skater, e.g., [32] and [33], could be used in an article in the future. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Most of these photos don't appear to be own work so permission for these should be send to Commons:OTRS. If that doesn't happen, these photos should be deleted. Multichill (talk) 10:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- That hasn't been asked for from the uploader in the last decade - and still doesn't seem to have been requested on their talk page. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Procedural close: I will redo the DR's to give more specific deletion rationales for individual files. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own work, because uploader is subject of the photo and transmission code in some EXIF data. Needs COM:OTRS.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep and @P199: please keep the discussion in one place, splitting it across multiple pages (particularly without pinging those that participated above) really doesn't help. Mike Peel (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- This Keep vote doesn't address the copyright concern at all. BTW, splitting up the DR is actually helpful because you can address different issues separately. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Professional photos of the uploader, presumably copyrighted. Would need OTRS proof from the copyright owner. -M.nelson (talk) 21:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note that no-one has asked the uploader for OTRS for the last *decade*, let alone during this deletion debate... Mike Peel (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. An image with copyright concern will get nominated for deletion irrespective of how long ago it was uploaded. The uploader has now received notification of this DR on his talk page and now has an opportunity to reply or submit an OTRS. No different than all the other DR's that require OTRS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note that no-one has asked the uploader for OTRS for the last *decade*, let alone during this deletion debate... Mike Peel (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I would normally let images of this age with no conclusive proof either way slide, but the problem here is that the uploader appears to be the subject and the photos do not appear to be selfies. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romanabrate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per above, the subject of the photo is the uploader. Since the photo isn't a selfie, it must have been taken by someone other than the subject/uploader, and the Own Work claim is invalid. We need permission from the photographer through COM:VRT.
-M.nelson (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
enthält personenbezogene Daten, Version vom 14.08.2021 um 17:16 soll drin bleiben Celestine Kleinesper (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: kept the file of 19:16, deleted the other versions. @Celestine Kleinesper: please check because you mentioned 17.16. There is no version of 17:16. --Ellywa (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Cardassia (fictional) Star System 3.png and File:Diagram of the (fictional) planetary system of Cardassia from the American SiFi series Star Trek.png
[edit]_Star_System_3.png){kind=link}
_planetary_system_of_Cardassia_from_the_American_SiFi_series_Star_Trek.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Star_System_3.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
the graphic used for the seventh planet is copyrighted. see here. I provided a replacement Shisma (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
To Shisma
If that website has this picture then they took it from me because I made that picture.
So please take your very nice foto or diagram and make your own common file and leave me alone DARK12345
- @D A R C 12345: I am only referring to the picture of the 7th planet. it is a direct screencap of the Episode The Dogs of War. The rest of the graphic is probably fine. The same applies to File:Diagram of the (fictional) planetary system of Cardassia from the American SiFi series Star Trek.png --Shisma (talk) 15:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: kept, I consider this part of the total image as de minimis. --Ellywa (talk) 22:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)